6106C19 SHSpec-15 Q and A Period: Auditing Slowdowns

Test for a release: The person should not be reading weirdly on a meter;
the sensitivity knob should be down -- you should get a good drop with
sensitivity zero. You should get no reaction on the questions, "Do you think
you'll get any worse? Does scientology work for you? How do you feel about
help? How do you feel about control?"

Every time you find something in the PC struggling for survival, it isn't
the PC, because he can't do anything but survive. It's a valence. Every
valence fights for survival. It can be such a clever valence that it can fool
the auditor. The Auditor's Code is there so the valence won't feel
challenged, so it won't kick back before you can jump it. The PC gets most
upset by the auditor's failure to handle his case. The valence says, "See the
red herring?" If the auditor complies, the PC will get unmanageable because
he's lost confidence in the auditor's control. The auditor needn't apologize
for positive, certain control. That's how to make valences lose and PC's
win. Kindness validates valences, not pcs. Valences aren't hard to handle if
you are certain and let it come across. Auditing weakly gives power to the
PC's circuits and valences; auditing with certainty validates the PC.

Instant read is within a tenth of a second.

[The "death of the Ego" is the death of the valence.]