6203C01 SHSpec-121 Model Session II
If your PC hasn't been gotten into session by the time you have run
havingness, the rest of the ruds probably won't do it for you. The next step
is often too steep a gradient if the PC isn't already fairly willing to have
you audit him.
O/W has a liability for getting the PC into session: it can miss a
withhold, throwing the PC wildly out of session. Don't use an ARC break
process to handle an ARC break when the PC won't be audited. It works to get
a PC who is somewhat out of session better in. The rud will improve the PC's
in-sessionness, not create it. The PC has to be in session enough to run a
process.
Don't use havingness to heal an ARC break except in extremis. If you are
using havingness to handle an ARC break, you will notice that the last thing
the PC will point to is you, the auditor. Therefore, don't use "Are you
willing to talk to me about your difficulties?" unless you are desperate and
there is nothing else to do, or unless it is not a heavy ARC break, just sort
of a "cooler" PC.
The PC's ARC breaks always stem from from no-auditing. If he is still
fussing and arguing with you, he is in session enough to be audited. But if
he is totally absorbed in his case and not willing to talk to the auditor, he
is not in session. A missed withhold is an absence of auditing which creates
an ARC break. In the withhold system, it is the who should have known which
gives you most TA, because it points up absence of auditing.
To help get the PC into session during prepchecking, since you don't want
to run any O/W, run something like "Who would I have to be to audit you?" or
the ARC 61 Process [Several questions about talking to people about
difficulties. See HCOB 30Nov61 "ARC Process 1961".] There is one process you
can run that must be flattened and not get stuck in the second dynamic
restimulation it creates: "Touch my (body part)," repetitive. It is flat
when there is no longer any misemotion, love, anguish, etc. on it. It does
cure the PC falling in love with the auditor.
[Details on use of ruds in prepchecking and Routine 3DXX sessions.]
Goals and gains let both auditor and PC know whether there has been
progress. "Gains" is particularly for the auditor; it gives the auditor
wins.
When you end the session, make sure it is ended. If there seems to be
any question, ask, "Has the session ended for you?" If necessary have the PC
touch parts of the environment. Get him into present time then end the
session. Not really ending the session is not a very serious error, but it is a very common one. You can tell if the session is ended by whether the PC is still talking to you about the session afterwards or still treating you as his auditor after session.
Wyszukiwarka
Podobne podstrony:
SHSpec 120 6203C01 Model Session ISHSpec 162 6206C21 Model Session Revisedmodel Arkusz IIMODEL STANDARDOWY IIModel pr II(TAK9)MGO LW WK0 Polityka makroekonomiczna w gospodarce otwartej Model Mundella Fleminga, część IIModuł 4 Model IS LM część IISHSpec 271 6305C30 Programming Cases (Part II)BREAKOUT II CABLE ADAPTOR Model 422BOCSHSpec 310 6309C25 Summary II Scientology 0SHSpec 169 6207C10 Repetitive Rudiments and Repetitive Prepchecking (Part II)SHSpec 221 6211C29 R2 12 Theory and Practice (Part II)[Paper Model] World War II Half Trackwykład 6 Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) IISHSpec 83 6612C06 Scientology Definitions [Part] IISHSpec 219 6211C27 Routine 2 12 (Part II)więcej podobnych podstron