WAZNIEJSZE PRZYTACZANE SPRAWY SADOWE

Kanada
Sue Rodriguez v. The Attorney General of Canada and the Attorney General of British Columbia, Canada Supreme Court Reports, cz.4, t. 3, s. 519-632.

Zjednoczone Krolestwo
Airedale N.H.S. Trust v. Bland, 19 lutego 1993, 2 Weekly Law Reports, s. 316-400.
B (A Minor)(Wardship: Medical Treatment), In re, [1981] 1 Weekly Reports 1421 (C.A.)
C (A Minor)(Wardship: Medical Treatment), In re, [1989] 3 All England Reports, 927 (C.A.)
J (A Minor)(Wardship: Medical Treatment), In re, 1990, 3 All England Reports, 930 (C.A.)
Reg. v. Cox, bez sprawozdania, 18 wrzesnia 1992, sedzia Ognall.
Reg. v. Adams, bez sprawozdania, 8 kwietnia 1957, sedzia Devlin.
Reg. v. Arthur, bez sprawozdania, 5 listopada 1981, sedzia Farquharson.

Stany Zjednoczone Ameryki
Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc,103 Supreme Court 2481( 1983).
Otis Bowen v. American Hospital Association et al., U.S. Supreme Court.106 Supreme Court 2101. Nr 84-15-9, 9 czerwca 1986.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health (1990) 110 Supreme Court, 2841.
Quinlan, In re, 70 New Jersey 10 355 A.2d (1976).