IMG 04

Notes

54.    AOS. p. 369.

55.    Albert Einstein, “Autobiographical Notes," Albert Einstein: Philosopher. Scientist. Vol. 1. Paul Arthur Schilpp, cd. (New York, 1959), p. 21.

Ip. MACH'S INFLUENCE ON r.AKt.V LOCICAL ł'OSlTlVISM AND ON QOANTUM THF.ORY

1.    Leitgedan^en (Leipzig, 1919). p. 2.

2.    Encyclopaedia Uritannica, Vol. I (New York, 1929), p. 168.

3.    F. A. von Hayek, "Diskussionsbemergungcn uber Ernst Mach und das sozialwisscnschafrlirhe Dcnkcn in Wicn,” Sympotium (Freiburg, 1967), pp. 41-44-

4.    Philipp Frank, Between Physics and Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass., 1941), P- 9-

5.    Herbert Fcigl, "Moritz Schlick,” Erl^erintnis. 7 (1938), 399.

6.    Rudolf Carnap, "Intellectual Autobiography," The Philosophy o] Rudolf Cemap, Paul Arthur Schilpp, cd. (La Salle, 111., 1963), p. 20. Heinrich Gompcrz also hcld "at homes" at this timc which met on Saturdays and indudcd many of the same pcoplc who attended Schlick’s “comersations."

7.    Bela Juhos, "Moritz Schlick," The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 7 (New York, 1967), pp. 319-321.

8.    Carnap, op. cit., p. 15.

9.    Rudolf Carnap, “Ober dic Aufgaben der Physik," Kant Studien, 28 (1923),

9>.

jo. Carnap, "Intellectual Autobiography," p. 16.

11.    Rudolf Carnap, “The Rcjcction of Mctaphysics,” The Age of Analysis, Morton While, cd. (New York, 1959), pp. 213-214.

12.    Privatc communication from Rudolf Carnap (1969). During a conversa-tion at his housc I asked him: "But you don’t belicve that rcfcrcncc implies existence?" "But I do!" replied Carnap "F.xactly that! Only I do not bclievc that rcfcrcncc deterrnines mcaning as you scetn to think." I did not press the subjcct further.

13.    Carnap, •'Intellectual Autobiography,” pp. 18, 44. 863. Ludwig Boltzmann was the truć prcdccessor of both Wittgcnstein and Carnap with rcspcct to linguistic rcductionism: . . die Ausdruckswcisc des Rcalismusist zwcckmassiger ais die des Idcalismus." Sec his Populdre Schriften (leipzig, 1925), p. 180.

14.    Frank, op. at.. p. 6-7.

15.    Otto Ncurath to Ernst Mach, 2 ALK Feldpost 20, undated but during World War I.

iG. Robert S. Cohen, "Otto Ncurath," The Encylopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 5 (New York, 1967), p. 477.

17.    Carnap. "Intellectual Autobiography," p. 23.

18.    Sec Appcndix.

19.    For four different definitions of "physicalism" sce PSL (La Salle, III., '5»43)» P- 210, and Carnap, "Intellectual Autobiography," pp. 50 and 59.

20.    Sce chap. 13.

21.    Wittgcnstcins original yersion may be found in his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (London, 1958), pp. 187 and 189.

22.    Carnap, "Intellectual Autobiography," pp. 24 and 29.

k

23.    Ibid., pp. 25-28.

24.    F. A. von Hayck, "Unfinishcd Draft of a Skctch of a Biography of Ludwj* Wittgćnstcin," p. 44.

25.    Carnap, "Intellectual Autobiography," pp. 2^-29.

26.    Stephen Toulmin, "From Logical Analysis to Conceptual History,^-' The Legacy of logical Posttwism, Peter Achinstcin and Stephen Barker, edt'(Baltimore, 1969). pp. 34. 39“4°- For a different point of view sce Normin Kretzmann, "History of Semantics," The Encyclopedia oj Philosophy. Vol. VII (1967), p. 402!

27.    Ludwig Wittgensiein, Philosophical lnvcr.igaiions (New York, 1963), P- 34-

28.    Heinrich Ldwy, "Historisches zur Ouantcrnhcorie,” Naturwissensehafien. 21 (1933). 302-303-

29.    Sce chap. 14.

30.    Sec Carlton Bcrcnda Wcinbcrg, Mach’s EmpińoPragmatism in Phyncal Science (New York, 1937), p. 52.

31.    Ihid., pp. 104-109.

32.    Ibid., pp. 106 and ro8.

33.    Sec Norwood Russell Manson, "The Copcnhagcn lntcrprctation of Quan-tum Thcory," Philosophy of Science, Arthur Danto and Sidney Mnrgenhesser. cds. (Clcvcland, 1964). pp- 450-470.

34.    Broglic has switched morę than oncc. He first opposcd the Copeahagen interpretation, then for twenty-fivc years hc acccptcd ii (1927-1962), and then hc rencwcd his opposition to it (Louis dc Broglie, New Perspectiies in Physics [New York, 1962], p. 153).

35.    Max Jammcr, The Conceptual Dct/elopmen: of Quantum Mcchonscs (New York, 1966), pp. 351-352.

36.    For a defense of the Copenhagen position sec Hanson, op. cit.

37.    S. Rozental, Nicls Bohr (New York, 1964), pp. 13 and 25.

38.    Anton Thorr.scn correspondcd with Mach between 1910 and 1913 and was cnthusiasttc about his theory of economy. Georg von Hevesy correspondcd with Mach between 1904 and 1906 and with Bohr between 1913 an:l 1922. Von Hcvcsy won a Nobel pri/.c in chemistry in 1943.

39 Jammcr, op. cit., pp. 167, 176-* 79-    .    „    , .

40.    Nicls Bohr, Essays /95S-/962 on Atomie Physics and Humań Knoutcdge (London, 1963), pp. 2 and 7.

41.    Wolfgang Pauli, Collcctcd Scientific Papers, Vol. I (New \ork, 1964), p.'•

42.    Wolfgang Pauli, "Der Einfluss archtypischcr Vor$tcllungen auf die Bildung naturwisscnschaftlichcn Thcoricn l>ci Kepler,” NałureĄhirung und Psyc e. 4 (1952), 109.

43- Sec Erwin Schrodingcr, Aly Vieu> of the World (Cambr.dgc, 1064), P- viu

44. Erwin Schrodingcr, Mind and Matter (Cambridge, 1959)-P* 5*-    ₍

45- Thomas S. Kuhn, Sources for History of Quantum Physics (Philadelphu.

*9^7). p- 45-

46. Ibid., p. 51.    .    ,

47- Sec Karl Groos, "Ruckkchr zu Mach? Ober den Pbówismus P^cuol Jordans," BUitter fiir deutsche Philosophie. ti (1937). 117-120.

48. Sce chap. 17.    _

49- Scc Hugo Dinglcr, Mm Planck und die Begrundung Jer sogena modernen theoretischcn Physik (Braunschweig, >939)-

359