436069717

Hlgher Is better

Intel® Core™ i9-10900K (CML-S 10+2) IA Performance Projections

Intel* Core™ i9-10900K (CML-S102) 125W/250W vs. Intel* Core™ i9-9900K (CFL-S82) 95W/210W

2.00

1.80

1.60

1.40

1.20

1.00

0.80

0.60

0.40

0.20

0.00

SYSmark* 2014 SE - Overall	SPECint_rAte	SPECfp_rate	SPECłnt_rato	SPECfp_rato	CINEBENCH H15	TouchKPHT* 2016	WebXPRT^42015	WobXPRT^# 3
	_ bas*2006	. bas<?2006	_base2006	J>aso2006	x-CPU 64-blt	Overall Scoro	Ovornll Scoro (Edgo)	Ovornll Scoro (Edgo)
	IC16.0	IC16.0	(1-copy ratt)	(1-copy rato)
			IC16.0	106.0

In the same chassis, Intel® Core™ i9-10900K (CML-S 10+2) is expected to deliver up to 1.30x the CPU performance of

Intel® Core™ i9-9900K (CFL-S 8+2) as projected by SPECint_rate_base2006_IC16.0

Performance results are based on projections as of 11/04/2019 and may not reflect all publicly available security updates. See configuration disclosure for details. No product can be absolutely secure.

Refer to appendix for workload and configuration details

Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors.

Performance tests_: such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific Computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. Consult other information and performance test' ^ss*?{ i ^ fi/ly e> ^It-ątim contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products.    Jj^lyyY/

For morę information ao to httn //www intel mm/henohmarks