290420656

290420656



15 ROMANIAN-SERBIAN RELATIONS (1859—1866) 221

The diplomatic aid tendered by the Prineipalities and Serbia to each other with regard to the problem of their adhesion to the Paris Telegraph Convention, of May 17,1865, may also be mentioned as a further example.

In this respect T. Callimaki reported : “Le gouyernement serbe dćsire suivre la meme voie que le gouyernement roumain et agir a peu pres pareil-lement” 80. Ignoring Turkey’s opposition whieh eonsidered the relations between suzerain and vassal as inconsistent with the latter’s right of concluding international convention — a right eonfined to sovereign States only 81 — the Prineipalities and Serbia agam proved on this oc-easion their independent diplomatic position.82

Conclusions. From this bnef survey the following eonelusions can be drawn relating to the main features of the relations between United Prineipalities and Serbia during the above mentioned period : a) Eo-manian and Serbian relations are characterized by their steady deve-lopment, aiming at a common diplomatic action against the foreign — Ottoman and Hapsburgian rule — m order to obtain their fuli State sove-reignty ; b) The Eomaman-Serbian relations are an integral part of a wider diplomatic action, tending at developing closer relations with other countries of South-Eastern Europę that had already gained their inde-pendence as well as with nations that were at the time fighting to set up a national sovereign State; e) For this purpose the diplomatic organs of the United Prineipalities and Serbia underwent ehanges to adapt these agencies to their major diplomatic function of ensuring a consistent mu-tual diplomatic support; d) The Eomaman-Serbian diplomatic activity appeared in their relationship with the Great Powers as diplomatic relations of two sovereign countries, carried on in accordance with the rules of modern European international law; e) Eomania and Serbia, sovereign States, continued to maintain relations of good neighbourhood on equal footing with all countries in South-Eastern Europę — including Turkey — as well as with all other countries with which they had diplomatic relations.

10 Sce United Prineipalities' agent in Belgrade to Cuza's Cabinet, Belgrade, March 11, 1865, in “Agency .”, annex no. 30, p 48.

•i Sec MAE, vol. no. 296, sheet 345r-346r

12 The United Prineipalities presented its adhesion through I Alecsandn, Romaman agent in Pans, and Serbia sent I. Magasmovitsh, the President of the Senat, for this purpose to the French Capital. On this occasion the Serbian delegate lent Romania a substantial diplo-matic support in its campaign against the incorporation of the Romaman State in the Austnan Empire.



Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
13 ROMANIAN-SERBIAN RELATIONS (1859—1866) 219 Serbia likewise maintained diplomatic relations w
3 ROMANIAN-SERBIAN RELATIONS (1859—1866) 209 examinant les faits qui se sont produits depuis un
11 ROMANIAN SERBIAN RELATIONS (lSyi—1S66) 217 An exchange of military experts took place betwee
STEREOTYPES IN NEW SERBIAN HISTORY TEXTBOOKS BETWEEN THE CLASS AND NATIONALDETERMINISM DUBRAYKA STOJ
VI Figurę supplementaire (Chapitre 1) 2. The relative proportions of the pro- and maturę forms of fu
9 R0MANIAN-SERB1AN RELATIONS (1859—1*66) 215 In their capacity of permanent diplomatic organs,
geologia matpom03 4 As slope angle changos, the relative vaiues of the two components me Earth s gra
00105 ?03ace3403aee62d22aac93e4bd4d18 7Economic Control Charts: Relating the Model and Finding the
00151 ?ac5d664405d180127a449f8d3c8023 152 Simpson & Keats values of the ARLs. Table 15 shows th
SUBJECT EDUCATIONAL EFFECTS relating to knowledge: knows the rules and read the documentation of the
15 Introduction We thank all the Authors of the texts for their active participation in creating the
ROMANIAN SOCIO-POLITICAL TERMS IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE BULGARIAN PERIODICALS ISSUED IN ROMANIA ZAMFIR

więcej podobnych podstron