290420644

290420644



3 ROMANIAN-SERBIAN RELATIONS (1859—1866) 209

examinant les faits qui se sont produits depuis un an, dans les Prineipautós-Unies, on peut des aujourd’hui rópondre par l’affirmative”.1

On the International piane, the relations between the United Prin-cipalities and Serbia had the following common aims : abolishment of the Ottoman suzerainty, maintained by the Paris Treaty of March 30, 1865 j the fight against the Hapsburgian rule that claimed certain terri-tories which, according to the principle of self-determination and the constitution of the national unitary States, were due to be included m the territory of the United Principalities and Serbia respectiyely ; co-ordination of their policies, in face of diplomatic aetiyity of the Great Powers in South-Eastern Europę; the progressiye conąuest of those attributes of sovereignty ensuring the quahtative leap represented by the acquisition of State independence and national unity; to support all the peoples in South-Eastern Europę fighting for their freedom as well as good neigh-bour relations with all States especially those in this part of Europę.

We may quote several characteristic stages inthe progressiye curtail-ment of the Ottoman suzerainty oyer the South-Eastern European countries, aiming at abolishing it: Personal Union of the Romanian Principalities, January 5 and 24, 1859; Politieal Union, December 1861; its international recognition, in June 1864, in defiance of the policy carried out by Turkey and Austria. 2

Following the yiolent clashes between the Belgrade population and the Turkish garrison, clashes that occurred in June 1862, Serbia gained a morę favourable international position, embodied in the Protocol of September 1862, signed by the guaranteeing powers.3 Regarding the pro-gress achieyed by Serbia in obtaining the absolute and complete abolishment of the Ottoman rule, C. Negri, the United Principalities’ agent at Constantinople, reported to Cuza, the ruling Prince : „U parait positif que les Serbes vont demander, non seulement le dśpart des Turcs qui

14 - c. 3609

1

Ibidem. “Les nationalitćs serbe, roumaine, bulgare, herzegovienne, macćdonienne, rou-mólienne, montćnignenne, etc. — the “Europę” newspaper of Apnl 7, 1864 points out on tlie same linę —, reparaissent plus vivaces que jamais .. et demandent avec insistance une orgam-sation, ni moins bonne, ni moins complfcte, que 1’organisation politique et sociale des autres peu-ples de TEurope

2

* See the Protocol of September 6, 1859, the Constantinople agreement, December 1861, the Constantinople Protocol, June 28, 1864, in Archwes Diplomatiquesf vol. II, Pans, 1866, p. 166 — 168 ; 200 — 202; 230 — 232; See also G G Florescu, Unele aspecte ale pozifici Internationale a Jdnlor Romdne tn perioada Unim (Some aspects of the International position of the Romanian Principalities dunng the Union period) in “Studn $i cer-celSri jundice” (Studies and jundical researches, Year IV (1959) no. 1, pp 135 — 166; D Berindei, Lupta diplomaticó. a Pnncipatclor Unitę pentru dcs&ulręirca uniru (24 lanuarie 1850—24 lanuarie 1862) (The diplomatic struggle of the United Principalities for the accom-plishment of their Union, January 24, 1859 — January 24, 1862), in “Studn pnvind um-rea Principatelor“ (Studies relating to the Union of the Romanian Principalities) Ed Acad. R.PR., Bucharest, 1960, p. 413-449.

3

See Archwes diplomatiqu.es, vol. I, Pans, 1863, p. 234 — 244; Cf. Correspondence relating to the bombardment of Belgrade in June 1862f London, 1863.



Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
13 ROMANIAN-SERBIAN RELATIONS (1859—1866) 219 Serbia likewise maintained diplomatic relations w
15 ROMANIAN-SERBIAN RELATIONS (1859—1866) 221 The diplomatic aid tendered by the Prineipalities
11 ROMANIAN SERBIAN RELATIONS (lSyi—1S66) 217 An exchange of military experts took place betwee
page0265 263 263 Estlier commandaeiifin aManloclieed’assembIer tous les juift qui se truuyaient tian
erreurs!4 COMM6 DfiNS UN MIROIR ! €ntoure les 10 diffćrences qui se sont glissees entre ces potineur
Ce schema montre que sur l axe 1 les mois de janvier sont tres proches l un de 1 autre, traduisant u
- 8 Sous 1’empire de la force se rencontrent nścessaire-ment enire les Etats les inegalilćs qui se
225 ions d hydrogene (dans les mousses habituellement pH < 5 et dans les sables, dans tous les ca
3-2) Methodes cTanalyse utilisees 3-2-1) Methodes standard Les etudes qui suivent sont essentielleme
Archives diocćsaines d — 10T> — celto de Brcsf. Cc sont les trevcs qui se plaigncnt de la parł &l
110 CAROLINE GUIBET LAFAYE Concentrant leur attentłon sur la formę, les architectes modernistes se s
Apres une periode de morosite en terme de style, les constructeurs joponois se sont peu a
Anna? 1 p44 11 /Imailles &
Aggar et lui montre les curiositćs qui se trouvent a l’cxtćrieur du palais proprement dit. Ensuite,
112 et apres avoir examine les elements de preuve, le juge peut prendre toute mesure nścessaire pour
82 au Quebec, la loi exige que les faits litigieux puissent objectivement etre peręus comme hostiles
HISTORIQUE 17 Les faits rapportes ci-dessus, tout incomplets ou fragmentaires qu’ils sont, ne laisse

więcej podobnych podstron