4053062876

63

3.4. WEEK 30-33

M MK)Am OKfTCZANMK H &KpOBOVfCTMrA.²⁹⁷ MNOIAZLIHbNZ. CICVf4>Z. p&EZ CBOEOAb NZ BbCrA M O BbCE^Z ^pHCTOCZ.

3.4 Week 30-33

Saturday of Week 30 after Pentecost

Eph. 5 1-8 (MSS: SOBZJPQRHKMTCTf P30 F A L W)

5 1 SpATMK;. EbIBAMTG 0VfE0 nOAOEBNM EOR>Vf. tAKO HAAA BZ£AK)EAK-NA 2 M ^OAMTG BZ AIOEZBM toKOTKG M ^pMCTOCZ BZ£AK)BM NACZ. M npTAACTZ CGEG £A NACZ.²⁹⁸ npMNOUJGNMIO M ttpbTBtt BOrOVf. BZ BONIA EAArO^ANMIA. 3 AWGOA^toNWS²⁹⁹ JKC- M BbOAKA NGHMCTOTA M AM^OMMANMK-NM AA³⁰⁰ MMGNOVfŁ€TZ CA BZ BACZ IAICOKG nOAOEAK-TZ CBATbIMMZ. 4 MAM CpAMOTA MAM E0V{1€ CAOBO MAM CKpTNbCTBO IAJKG NG riOAOEAlGTZ. r>lZ IIAHC- nO^BAA^NMK.³⁰¹ 5 CC BO AA IOCTG B*KA^UJ€ tAKO BbCfAKZ AWGOA^M³⁰² MAM N6HMCTZ MAM AM^OMMbUb. M>KG KCTZ MAOAATpZ. ³⁰³ NG MMATZ AOCTOIANMIA³⁰⁴ BZ LTECApbCTBMM ^pMCTOBT M EOWMM. 6 NM

kzto *g bacz aa ng abctmtz tzujmmm caobgcbl cm^z bo pAAM rpAACTZ rrrbBZ eokmm

NA CbINbl npOTMBBNMłA. 7 NG E^ATTG OVfBO HpMHACTbNMUM MMZ. 8 ETCTG BO MNOrAA TbMA. NblhTfc ?KG CBTTZ O roCflOAM.

²⁹⁷    S Z J Q R H M,    P C Tf P30, OGp^ANMG M NGOCpK^ANklG K F A L W, OGpl;£ANHG H CpAHNGG

OGp^ANMG T. OGpU^ANMG NM AtpOBCTBMA B.

²⁹⁸    M P C Tf P30 W, no nacz F A L, no bacz O R H K T. bz nacz Q, bz bacz J B Z. The usual uncertainty between ‘us¹ and ‘you\ together with the preposition.

²⁹⁹    SOBZJPQRHKTC P30, gaov{*agnmg M , ga<ka F A L W. To a ccriain cxtent, M joins the lexicon of F A L W, see also below, notę on vs. 5.

³⁰⁰    ng add. H M C Tf P30. The double negation is adopted by a smali selection of MSS, including M.

³⁰¹    SOBZJPQRHKTC P30, baap o^Raacnmc- M, no^ov(A€NM€ Tf, GAAroAApCNHG F A L W. An almost customary confusion.

³⁰²    S O B Q H, AłOKOAnnu Z J P R K C Tf P30, ałogoa^mua T. ga^anmk M F A L W; The mainline of division is the same as above.

³⁰³    B H, MAOAOCAOVj>KMTGAh OJPTFALW. MAOAOJf;p-Kl t S Q R, KOV{MHpOCAOVJ*HTGA Z P30, ICOV{MMpOCAOVj>KNH»: C Tf, cao\|*ga KOVfwnpou M, KOV|MMpOM CAOVjJKMTGA K. An interesting comparison is offered by Col. 3, 5 (Sunday of Week 29, see above), whcrc eiSoAcupeia is translated almost along the same divisional lines between the Aposlolos manuscripts; only Z ‘switched’ from n ao ao a atpn a (Col. 3, 5) towards a formalion with covfMnpz hcre. For the MSS with abstracts the lexical division between the CS and TS grouping of the sources is confirmed herc. (cf. Part II of this book.)

M chooses the same remarkablc two-word translation there: caov{*ga tov(MVjpCK:A. An analogous transla-tion is offerrred by M a few words back in the same vcrse: for 7iXeove>cTTię all MSS have the ah^ommkug of the text, but M has mm-kgm am^o.

³⁰⁴    SOBZJPQRHKTCTf P30 W, npMMGCTMA M. naca-kama FAL. The unity of FALW is broken in this place, and M once again diverges from the main linę.