6926476419

6926476419



Estimation the effectiveness ofprobiotics as a faclor...    9

TABLE 2. Health status of fattening rabbils in contro! and experimental groups

Items

Estimated groups

Control

Experimental

Number of weaned kits

32(100%)

34(100%)

Numberof kits with diarrhea

9(28.12%)

8 (23.53%)

Number of kits. which falls

4(12.5%)

1 (2.94%)

Numberof fattened kits

28 (87.5%)

33 (97.06%)

animals in the experimental group (less cases of diarrhea).

The results of feed intake during fattening are prescnted in Table 3.


Dressing percentage (yield) was cal-culatcd according to the formula:

weight of cooled carcass x jqq j body weight before slaughter

The results are presented in Table 5.


TABLE 3, Feed intake

Group

ContToI

Experimental

Average feed intake during fattening (kg per 1 kg of gain)

3.66 ±0.32

3.73 ±0.27


TABLE 5. The results of average dressing percentage of fattening rabbits

Group

Control

Experimcntal

Average dressing (%)

51.81“

±1.8

52.94“ ±24

a - data in rows differ statistically at p < 0.05.


There was no impact on the efficien-cy of the preparation of the feed conver-sion: in both groups the average feed consumption per 1 kg of gain did not dif-fer statistically.

The group of 21 animals in the CG and 27 in the EG were slaughtered; for this group of animals were calculated av-erage finał mass and dissection’s indica-tors (Table 4).

There was observed a higher dressing percentage in experimental group at the same body weight in both groups: it shows the higher share of edible parts in the experimental group of rabbits. The difference in slaughter efficiency may also result in higher average body weight

TABLE 4. Dissection results of fattening rabbits (average for groups, x ±sd)

Items

Estimated groups

Control (n = 21)

Expcrimenlal (n = 27)

Body weight before slaughter (g)

2 298 ±260

2 295 ±258

Weight of the head (g)

152 ±17

146 ±13

Weight of the skin (g)

356 ±53

351 ±58

Weight of the gastrointestinal tract (g)

338 ± 26

334 ±49

Weight of meat offal (g)

94 ±13

92 ±15

Weight of carcass (g)

1 243 ±159

1 258 ±160

Weight of cooled carcass (g)

1 137 ±161

1 157 ±155



Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
Eslimalion the effecliveness ofprobiotics as a faclor...    II MAERTENS L.. RENTERGHE
shoes&pattens8 138 Shoes and Pałtens water pulls the fibres together as evaporation occurs. Treatme
00076 M7835e1b40748c3da0ef62db71aede2 75 Adaptive Hierarchical Bayesian Kalman Filtering estimates
45 Estimation of Horizontal Accuracy of the Large-Scale Digital Maps Table 1.
Improuing the effectiveness ofhow the Group functions As part of improving the effectiveness of how
128 Agata Borowska-PietrzakPersonnel audit as a tool of personnel information system The effectivene
Land value map as a source of information about local real estate market 67 The effect of these fact
Recovering a Dropped Table Using Oracle Flashback Drop Oracle Flashback Drop cnablcs you to rcversc
Federated Storage Engine Overview When you create a table using one of the standard storage engines
134 Table 5.1 Model selection testing for the effect of period and group (i.e. cohort and age) on th
135 Table 5.2 Model selection testing for the effect of mean size-independent body mass (M5), haemat
493 Okrzemki w morskim ekosystemie Antarktyki Fukushima H.. Meguro H.. 1966. The plankton ice as a b
73232 s&h 009 STKENtfTII AND HEALTH    !) A book of tlii« cliaracter is just as iinpo
circuits: the registers and counters. PEK_W09 Student has knowledge of adverse effects such as hazar
img025 (19) IiwestmentsGrammar1 Write the effect (1-4) next to the correct cause in the table below.

więcej podobnych podstron