8589356417

8589356417



Zh.K.Bokhoy, K.U.Korozbekoyo, B.Zh.Mutaliyeva. INTENSIFICATION OF METHANE ALLOCATION AT PROCESSING OFCATTLE WASTE

of liquid pig’s manure was founded after 20 days. There are microorganisms in liquid cattle manure, which decomposes the manure organie compounds. Cattle is a ruminant animal, in their rumen occur microorganisms such as hydrolysis of the genus MegasphaeraY.elsdenii, whichis already in the rumen converts macromolecules into their monomers. From methanogenic Methanomicrobium and Methanospiriillum bacteria exist in gut of ruminant animal. Therefore process of anacrobic fermentation

occurs morę rapidly and methane formation morę intensively in substrates from liquid cattle manure than with pig manure in experiments

[7].

The basie qualitative and quantitative features of biogas are formed from agricultural waste of the research study as follows: the percentage of methane in the biogas from liquid cattle manure is 63 % at normal conditions, the biogas from liquid pig manure is 57 % (Table 2).

Table 2

Substrates

Averagemethanecontent

(%)

Average

specific

biogas

yield

(Nm1 2 3/kg

oDM)

Average

specific

methane

yield

(Nm3/kg

oDM)

Coefficient of variation (%) of specific methane yield

Average content of DM (% of fresh materiał)

Average content of oDM (% DM)

Liquid

cattle

manure

63

0,447

0,283

7,649

3,73

72,14

57

0,339

0,196

29,846

2,11

66,15

Cattle and pig manures are the most abundant agricultural wastes. During the Processing of these wastes can be obtained biogas with methane content of 50-80%. The obtained results at 35 days hydrolytic retention time can be used to determine the dose and time of loading.

REFERENCES

4.    Ludington, D.,2006. Calculating the

Heating Value of Biogas. DLtech, Inc. Ithaca NY.    Available    from:

<http://www.dairyfarmenergy.com>.

5.    Deublein,D., A. Steinhauser, 2008. Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources. Germany, pp: 423.

6.    Al Seadi,T. and etc. Biogas handbook, 2008. Denmark, pp:125.

7.    Bacteria determinant of Berge, 1997. /under red. Choult,Dj., N. Krig, P. Snit, Dj. Steili and S. Williams. M.: World, pp: 368.

28


Journal oflndustrial Technology and Engineering, 2012, 2(3): 25 - 28

1

   Pain, B.F., R.Q. Hepherd, 1985. Anaerobic digestion of livestock wastes. In Pain, B.F., Hepherd, R.Q. (Eds.). Anaerobic digestion of farm wastes. NIRD Technical bulletins, Reading, pp: 9-14.

2

   Alastair, J.W., P.J.Hobbs, P.J Holliman and D.L.Jones,2008. Optimization of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour. Technol., 99: 7928-7940.

3

   APHA, 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Watcr and Waste water. Washington DC.



Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
Zh.K.Bakhov, K.U.Korozbekova, B.Zh.Mutaliyeva. INTENSIFICATION OF METHANE ALLOCATION AT PROCESSING O
Zh.K.Bakhow K.V.Korazbekoa. B.Zh Mutaliyeva. INTENSIFICA TION Oh METHANE ALLOCA TION A TPROCESSING O
ZhK.Bakhov. K.U.Korazbekova, B.Zh.Mutaliyeva. INTENSIFICATION OFMETHANE ALLOCATION ATPROCESSING OF C
POSTER SESSION, H20NEW INTENSITY MEASUREMENTS AND ANALYSIS OF THE IN-FRARED SPECTRUM OF METHANE IN T
Intensywność barwy Intensity of colour°BBtóS883 Intensywność barwy Intensity of colour
19128 skanuj0033 (58) SI z-Zh^i. - (?ę ?.A,,*    < £ *Uoy >2 AC 2 A <i9>«
SEA OF CHLORINE SEA OF METHANE SEA OF OXYGEN H -Highly technological S
Intensity of IR radiation level Temperaturę Thermal imaging of jet
63738 mb 19 MUSCLE HUtLDING. 19 arm will shake with the intensity of tlić effort. This is tlie reaso
font adjust a thafs right - all of these are at the same point (em) size. In CSS, any one of theseSe
skanuj0176 „A coherent set of actions aimed at gaining a sustainable advantage over competition im
00236 ?44d42d312bc68c022745b1ad4e5b39 238 Baxley Yourstone, S. A., and Montgomery, D. C. (1990). “D
00390 Zf7d8e96513ec41504c62cdf7fea002 394 Obenchain Probabi lity Plot of CuMulatioc Frequ

więcej podobnych podstron