CHLOROMETHANE
1
Chloromethane
1
CH
3
Cl
[74-87-3]
CH
3
Cl
(MW 94.95)
InChI = 1/CH3Cl/c1-2/h1H3
InChIKey = NEHMKBQYUWJMIP-UHFFFAOYAW
(methylating agent attacking C-, O-, N-, P-, S-, Se-, and Te-based
nucleophiles; organometallic derivatives provide source of Me
δ−
in reactions with >C=O, M–X, halogen, etc., and also as a base
towards C–H; radical substitution of Me by C
•
, halogen, etc.)
Alternate Name:
methyl chloride.
Physical Data:
mp −97.7
◦
C; bp −24.22
◦
C; d 0.991 g cm
−3
(−25
◦
C).
Solubility:
miscible with most organic solvents, sparingly with
aqueous media.
Form Supplied in:
colorless gas.
Purification:
gas passed through conc. H
2
SO
4
then water, and
dried with P
2
O
5
and fractionally distilled.
Handling, Storage, and Precautions:
usually available in cylin-
ders. Potent alkylating agent; high toxicity. Use in a fume hood.
Methylating Agent.
2
Nucleophilic displacement occurs read-
ily at carbon (eq 1), often via anions as in the methylation of
lithio-rhenocene (LiReCp
2
)
3a
and the more classical methylation
of acetoacetic, malonic, and cyanoacetic esters,
3
or in the alkyla-
tion of cyclopentadiene, or the α-attack of aliphatic ketones.
4
The
Friedel–Crafts reaction with benzene may be modified to provide
any or all of the possible polymethylbenzenes, as in the preparation
of 1,2,4,5-tetramethylbenzene.
5
A range of Lewis acid catalysts
have been applied
6a,6b
and the use of boron triflate exemplifies the
introduction of more novel catalysts.
6c,6d
Methyl cyanate may be
obtained from metal cyanates (MeCl, xylene-N,N-dialkylamide
mixtures)
7
and dimethyl carbonate similarly from K
2
CO
3
(phase-transfer catalysts; dipolar aprotic solvent).
8
MeCl
+
X
–
MeX
+
Cl
–
(1)
The carbonylation of MeCl leading to Acetyl Chloride is
achieved in the presence of superacids or metal catalysts (eq 2).
9
Correspondingly, metal sulfites are advocated
10
as routes to
Methanesulfonic Acid (eq 3). N-Methylation, either to give more
fully alkylated amines or to give quaternary ammonium salts, has
been widely reported (eq 4).
MeCOCl
MeCl
+
CO
(2)
MeCl
+
SO
3
2–
MeSO
3
–
+
Cl
–
(3)
(4)
RNMe
3
+
RNH
2
RNHMe
RNMe
2
In cases where the substrate is very susceptible to electrophilic
attack, both methylation and formylation are observed when
such reactions are carried out in DMF. The analogous reaction
with phosphorus (R
3
P, (RO)
3
P) provides phosphonium salts, the
deprotonation of which leads to synthetically useful phosphonium
ylides (eq 5).
(5)
(RCH
2
)
3
P
+
MeCl
[(RCH
2
)
3
PMe]
+
Cl
–
[(RCH
2
)
2
PMe]
+
[CHR]
–
Reductive methylation is observed when Cl or another dis-
placed group is removed by single-electron transfer to give
Cl
−
and, effectively, Me
•
. An example is the formation of
Me
2
SO
2
by the electrochemical reduction of MeCl in dipolar
aprotic solvents containing SO
2
.
11
Nucleophilic oxygen (e.g.
OH
−
, OR
−
, RCO
2
−
) and sulfur (e.g. S
2−
, HS
−
, RS
−
, SCN
−
,
S
2
O
3
2−
, RSO
2
−
, thiourea) are similarly methylated, while Te
and Se show analogous chemistry. Halide ion exchange reactions
(including N
3
−
) are valuable routes between the various methyl
halides and also allow the synthesis of labelled RCl (e.g. Me
36
Cl).
Asymmetric methylation is achieved using chiral phase-transfer
catalysts (e.g. N-benzylcinchoninium salts), as in the attack at C-2
of 2-phenyl-5-methoxy-6,7-dichloroindanone.
12
Organometallics.
Methylmagnesium chloride (MeCl, Mg,
Et
2
O under dry, O
2
-free conditions) provides a nucleophile capa-
ble of reacting with (i) metal halides in a transmetalation reaction,
(ii) proton sources, including alcohols, phenols, amines, imines,
and amides, (iii) electrophilic carbon, as in aldehydes, ketones,
carboxylic acid derivatives, nitriles, and epoxides, and (iv) ele-
ments such as O
2
, S
8
, I
2
, interhalogens such as CNCl, and species
such as CO
2
and SO
2
. While Grignard reactions give alcohols with
many carboxylic acid derivatives, the reaction with RCOCl (eq 6)
may be used to form methyl ketones in good yield (63–92%) by
the presence of Tris(acetylacetonato)iron(III) (THF, rt).
13
Such
a process replaces the older techniques which used FeCl
3
, or the
formation of organozinc or -cadmium intermediates.
(6)
MeCl
+
Mg
MeCOR
+
MgCl
2
MeMgCl
RCOCl
Substitution in the Alkyl Group. Hydrogen abstraction pro-
vides a carbon-based radical which leads to substituted derivatives.
Thus further chlorination of MeCl leads to CH
2
Cl
2
, CHCl
3
, and
CCl
4
(eq 7); fluorination of MeCl proceeds similarly.
14
Hydrogen
isotope exchange may also be achieved in this way.
(7)
MeCl
+
X
2
H
2
CXCl
+
HX
X = Cl, F
CHX
2
Cl
CX
3
Cl
Related Reagents. Bromomethane; Iodomethane.
1.
Holbrook, M. T. In Kirk–Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology,
4th ed.; Wiley: New York, 1993; Vol. 5, p 1028.
2.
(a) de la Mare, P. B. D.; Swedlund, B. E. In The Chemistry of the
Carbon–Halogen Bond
; Patai, S., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1973; Part
1, p 409. (b) Katritzky, A. R.; Brycki, B., Chem. Soc. Rev. 1990, 19, 83.
(c) Feast, W. J. In Rodd’s Chemistry of Carbon Compounds, Supplements
to the 2nd Edition
; Ansell, M. F., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1975; Vol.
1, Parts A–B, p 31. (d) Bolton, R. In Rodd’s Chemistry of Carbon
Compounds, Second Supplements to the 2nd Edition
; Sainsbury, M.,
Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1991; Vol. 1, Parts A–B, p 214.
3.
(a) Heinekey, D. M.; Gould, G. L., Organometallics 1991, 10, 2977.
(b) Carruthers, W. Some Modern Methods of Organic Synthesis, 3rd
ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1986. (c) House, H. O.
Modern Synthetic Reactions
, 2nd ed.; Benjamin: New York, 1972.
(d) Arseniyadis, S.; Kyler, K. S.; Watt, D. S., Org. React. 1984, 31, 1.
Avoid Skin Contact with All Reagents
2
CHLOROMETHANE
4.
Caine, D. In Carbon–Carbon Bond Formation; Augustine, R. L., Ed.;
Dekker: New York, 1979; Vol. 1, p 85.
5.
Smith, L. I., Org. Synth., Coll. Vol. 1950, 2, 248.
6.
(a) Olah, G. A. Friedel–Crafts Chemistry; Wiley: New York, 1973.
(b) Roberts, R. M.; Khalaf, A. A. Friedel–Crafts Alkylation Chemistry;
Dekker: New York, 1984. (c) Olah, G. A.; Olah, J. A.; Ohyama, T., J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1984
, 106, 5284. (d) Olah, G. A.; Farooq, O.; Farnia,
S. M. F.; Olah, J. A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 2560.
7.
Khydyrov, D. N.; Gadzhiev, F. R.; Nizker, L. L.; Promonenkov, V. K.;
Kutov, V. M. USSR Patent 1 641 815, 1991 (Chem. Abstr. 1991, 115,
280 068w).
8.
Cella, J. A.; Bacon, S. W., J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 1122.
9.
(a) Erpenbach, H.; Gehrmann, K.; Lork, W.; Prinz, P. Ger. Patent 3 106
900, 1981 (Chem. Abstr. 1982, 96, 19 680a). (b) Eur. Patent Appl. 48
335, 1982 (Chem. Abstr. 1982, 97, 109 563q).
10.
Wuest, W.; Eskuchen, R.; Lohr, C. Eur. Patent Appl. 405 287, 1991
(Chem. Abstr. 1991, 114, 145 831d).
11.
Wille, H. J.; Kastening, B.; Knittel, D., J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial
Electrochem. 1986
, 214, 221 (Chem. Abstr. 1987, 106, 74 888z).
12.
Dolling, U. H.; Davis, P.; Grabowski, E. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984,
106
, 446.
13.
Fiandanese, V.; Marchese, G.; Martina, V.; Ronzini, L., Tetrahedron
Lett. 1984
, 25, 4805.
14.
Adcock, J. L.; Kunda, S. A.; Taylor, D. R.; Nappa, M. J.; Sievert, A. C.,
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1989
, 28, 1547 (Chem. Abstr. 1989, 111, 156 362r).
Roger Bolton
University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
A list of General Abbreviations appears on the front Endpapers