Participation Exemption
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2011/96/EU of 30 November
2011 on the common system of taxation applicable
in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries
of different Member States
The 1990 Directive was designed to eliminate tax
obstacles in the area of profit distributions between
groups of companies in the EU by:
abolishing withholding taxes on payments of
dividends between associated companies of
different Member States and
preventing double taxation of parent companies on
the profits of their subsidiaries.
Participation Exemption
The updated
of companies that the Directive
covers also includes:
• the European Company (
which may be created from 2004; and
• the European Co-operative Society (
) which may be created from 2006
Participation Exemption
The minimum shareholding was/is:
25% before 2005
20% from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2006
15% from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2008
and
10% from 1 January 2009
Company in Poland
„A” Company
Art. 10 OECD Model Treaty
Dividends may also be taxed in the source state, but
the tax charged shall not exceed:
•
5% of the gross amount of the dividends if the
beneficial owner is a company which holds directly at
least 25% of the capital of the company;
•
15% in all other cases
What does Beneficial Owner mean?
A person who enjoys the benefits of ownership even
though title is in another name.
Participation Exemption
For companies with unlimited tax liability in a EU Member
State or another European Economic Area (EEA) Member
State (or Switzerland), an exemption from the withholding
tax on dividends paid out by Polish companies is provided
(participation exemption). The foreign shareholder should
hold directly minimum 10% of shares in the Polish company
over the uninterrupted period of at least 2 years.
Example
A Sp. z o.o. is a legal entity incorporated under the Polish law.
The shareholders of A are:
-
a German LLC with 25% shares,
-
a British natural person with 20% shares,
-
a German partnership with 55% shares, in which a Duch LLC
holds 95% interests.
What are the tax consequences in the case of paying out
dividends?
Participation in the foreign entity
PE
Corporation
Poland
Profit: 1000
Profit: 1000
Tax: 25 % => 250
Tax: 25 % => 250
WHT: 15 % => 112,5
tax credit: 15 % => 112,5
tax liability => 30
After tax: 607,50
Foreign profits tax
exempted
effective taxation: 25 %
Effective taxation: 39,25 %
1. PE
2. Corporation
PIT: 19% => 142,5
Examples
What are the tax consequences when A
Sp. z o.o. holds 10% of shares in the EU
company over the uninterrupted period of
2 years?
Participation Exemption
Since a subsidiary company is taxed on the profits out
of which it pays dividends, the Member State of the
parent company had either:
• exempt profits distributed by the subsidiary from
any taxation or
• impute the tax already paid in the Member State of
the subsidiary against its own tax.
Member States must impute against the tax payable by the
parent company any tax on profits paid by successive
subsidiaries downstream of the direct subsidiary. This ensures
that the objective of eliminating double taxation is better
achieved.
Exemption
In case of dividends received from EU, EEA Member States and
Switzerland tax provisions could provide for two abolishing
methods:
1.
participation exemption is applied if the parent
company has held at least 10% capital participation
in the foreign subsidiary for an uninterrupted period
of at least 2 years.
2.
underlying tax credit: The tax actually paid by a
subsidiary on the part of its profits from which a
dividend was paid can be credited
– up to some
limit - against income tax payable by the parent
company.
Partnership in Poland
Partnership
„Company” means any corporation or any entity that is treated as a
body corporate for tax purposes.
„Enterprise of a Contracting State” means an enterprise carried on
by a resident of a Contracting State
Tax Treaty Issues Regarding Partnerships
Is the partnership entitled to the benefits of the tax treaty?
• The tax treaty is applicable to persons who are residents of
one or both of the Contracting States.
• When the partnership as such can be considered to be
resident of a Contracting State, it may enjoy the benefits of
the relevant tax treaty.
• To be considered a resident in a Contracting State, the
partnership should be liable to tax in that State by reason of
its domicile, residence, place of management or any other
criterion of a similar nature
Model of Taxation
transparent
intransparent
Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Norway, Sweden
Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, Spain, Portugal, Russia,
Romania, Lithuania, Ukraine, Hungary
France (transparent if no liability limitation), Italy, Switzerland
(national transparent, foreign intransparent)
, USA (check-the-
box), Czech Republic (unlimited partner transparent, limited
partner intransparent)
mixed
Tax Treaty Issues Regarding Partnerships
Conflicts of qualification result from the different
treatment of partnerships in the domestic laws of the
two states.
Due to such differences the income of an
„international” partnership could be taxed twice or no
taxation can take place.
Transparent Partnerships under Polish Tax Law
• In Poland a partnership is not subject to income (corporate) tax as it is
a “transparent” flow-through entity. The partnership’s income is
allocated to the individual partners and is taxed on each partner’s
level.
• However, a foreign partnership maintains its tax status in accordance
with the tax law of another state, provided it is treated as a legal
person and is taxed on its total income in another state.
• Foreign partners in a Polish partnership will be subject to limited
income tax liability if the business income is realized through a PE in
Poland. For treaty purposes it is assumed that every partner in a
partnership through his participation in the partnership has a PE in
each country where the partnership has a PE.