Part 6: Confirming the universality

of the RS vs. GS law by observing

hyper-GS and hyper-RS forms of life

Integrating from all
prior chapters, proves
ancient theory by
Ptahhotep of Egypt:
"There are 2 types of
men: Men of quality,
and men of quantity"
( - c. 2500 to 1500 BC)

¾ ͞Autists͟;Žƌ͞Aspergians͟Ϳis a group ʹ or rather grouping of people, known for having strong exotic GS-

type skills (e.g.: logical talent, elite EQ: ToM talent as in many Negros), and weaker RS... are weak in Neo-
Ed͛ƐZ^-type RQ and syllogical faculty, or RS aspects of ĐůĂƐƐŝĐĂůEd͛Ɛ EQ. Psychology of such skills, we
see later; differences in syllogical and logical skill studied in Part 7; first the neuroscientific first principles

¾ Proofs of the theory that Autists are hyper-GS/hypo-RS

± ;dŚĞƚŚĞŽƌLJ͛ƐĐŽƌŽůůĂƌLJŝƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞself-proclaimed rivals ŽĨƚŚĞƵƚŝƐƚƐ͕ƚŚĞ͞ĐƵƌĞďŝĞƐ͟;EĞŽ-NTs)

who militantly insist ƚŚĂƚƵƚŝƐŵŝƐĂĚŝƐŽƌĚĞƌƚŚĂƚŶĞĞĚƐƚŽďĞ͞ĐƵƌĞĚ͕͟ĂƌĞhyper-RS/hypo-GS. The
time is not yet at hand to declare neurosis a disease, though ;ŶŽƚĞ͗ƚŚĞďƌŽĂĚĚĞĨŝŶŝƚŝŽŶŽĨ͞ƵƚŝƐŵ͟
includes classical NTs as well)).

1.

Proof 1: Myelination (coverage of cable by sheath, to expedite signal velocity) is ƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽ͚tŚŝƚĞ
ŵĂƚƚĞƌ͛-type Axonic mass-neuronal ideology (Axons are often myelinated). As we saw (Parts 3, 12,
8), prodigious development in Axonic (and thus, in myelination) reflects hyper-GS type. So if
Axonic/Myelination elaboration is more in Autists, it is a good proof of Autist ~ Hyper-GS theory:-

a.

In 6-month old babies who develop Autism, white matter bundles have more structural
integrity than in normal babies (Wolff et al.; Gao ĞƚĂů͙͘ŚĂǀĞƐĂŝĚƚŚĞƐĂŵĞŝŶƚǁŽƉĂƉĞƌƐͿ

b.

Second part: It is well-known that glia (glial cells) have a key role in myelination (are thus
related to white matter). For this and other reasons, we state: hyper-glia ~ hyper-GS. In that
tradition, we see:

i.

John Hopkins Dept. of Neurology: ͞DĂƌŬĞĚŵŝĐƌŽŐůŝĂůĂĐƚŝǀĂƚŝŽŶŽďƐĞƌǀĞĚŝŶƚŚĞĐŽƌƚŝĐĂů
ƌĞŐŝŽŶƐĂŶĚǁŚŝƚĞŵĂƚƚĞƌŽĨƵƚŝƐƚƐ͟

ii.

The brains of Autistic (e.g.: Einstein) have a higher glia to neuron ratio (Einstein had 73%
more glia). Einstein was one of the famously Aspergian-ůŝŬĞƉĞŽƉůĞ͖ŚĞ͞ĚŝĚŶ͛ƚbegin
to ƐƉĞĂŬƵŶƚŝůŚĞǁĂƐĨŝǀĞLJĞĂƌƐŽůĚ͘͟Which is a typical Aspergian/Autist ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐ͙

Thus Autist brains are more GS type (note: Glia are probably tied to the polyamorous N-S base of reactions)

The generality of the split: hyper-GS vs. hyper-RS branching in humans - I

1

2.

Proof 2 might look for a relationship between Autism and the right hemisphere, which already is
known as more GS-related.

a.

͞. Gillberg ;ϭϵϴϯͿĨŽƵŶĚƚŚĂƚ͞ϲϮйŽĨƚŚĞĂƵƚŝƐƚŝĐĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶǁĞƌĞŶŽŶ-right-handed
ĐŽŵƉĂƌĞĚǁŝƚŚϯϳйŽĨƚŚĞĐŽŶƚƌŽůƐ͘͟dŚŝƐĨŝŶĚŝŶŐǁĂƐƌĞƉůŝĐĂƚĞĚďLJŽƚŚĞƌƐ͘͟dŚŝƐƐŚŽǁƐƚŚĂƚ
the right brain is often dominant in Autists.

3.

A proof might similarly look for a relationship between Autism and the right amygdala, whose
role in the GS is confirmed.

a.

Kleinhans et al., 2008 found that normal people ŚĂĚ͞ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚůLJŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚLJŝŶ
the left amygdala compared ƚŽƵƚŝƐƚƐ͘͟

b.

͞/ŶƚŚĞĂƵƚŝƐŵŐƌŽƵƉ͕ƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚLJĐůƵƐƚĞƌƐǁĞƌĞĨŽƵŶĚŝŶƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚ
ĂŵLJŐĚĂůĂ͟;<ůĞŝŶŚĂŶƐ)

4.

Another proof characterizes certain neurostructures, like insula, as largely RS-related (see Part
10) and then goes on to argue that these are less developed in Autists, hence Autists are hypo-RS
(hyper-GS). Similarly, Turner et al. find less quantitative cabling from Old Base areas whose
quantitative areas are RS-ƌĞůĂƚĞĚ;ƐĞĞWĂƌƚϮͿ͗͞Atypically diffuse functional connectivity between
caudate nuclei and cerebral cortex in ĂƵƚŝƐŵ͟

5.

Autists seem generally less dendritic (thus more generative); for example about the highly
dendritic purkinje cells (see Part 8, p. 13), ƵƚŝƐƚĐĞƌĞďĞůůƵŵƐŚĂǀĞ͞ĚĞĐƌĞĂƐĞĚPurkinje cells
(Kemper et al., 1998; Bailey et al. ϭϵϵϴͿ͘͟(that, with insula detail, explains lack of body language)

6.

The converse also ŚŽůĚƐ͙Ğ͘Ő͗͘ƚŚĞpresence of too much dopamine in the brain is associated
with talkative tendency, which so deeply characterizes the non-Autistic (i.e. syllogical) personality

™ Hence Autistic brains may be referred in discussing how hyper-GS and hyper-RS brains differ

The very term Autist, as it has the root autos ;͞acting from or occurring within͟Ϳ, indicates self-generating
thoughts (lacks quantitative reactions to stimuli), or, hyper-GS ŶĂƚƵƌĞ͖͞ƐƉĞƌŐŝĂŶ͟сƚŚĞ͞ĨƵŶŶLJ͟verbal
Autist; ĂŶĂƚLJƉŝĐĂů;ĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƚŝǀĞůŽŐŝĐĂůͿǀĞƌďĂůďĞŚĂǀŝŽƵƌ͙ĂĐĐŽŵƉĂŶŝĞƐƚŚĞƚLJƉŝĐĂůƵƚŝƐƚ͛ƐƌŝŐŚƚ-brain/GS
logical skill. From the other direction also we can derive the same thing, i.e. creative (generative) lifestyles
ŝŶǀŽůǀĞƵƚŝƐŵ͙͙͙͘͘ĂƐ,ĂŶƐƐƉĞƌŐĞƌŶŽƚĞĚ͕͞ĂƚŽƵĐŚŽĨƵƚŝƐŵŝƐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJĨŽƌƐƵĐĐĞƐƐŝŶƐĐŝĞŶĐĞŽƌĂƌƚ͘͟

The generality of the split: hyper-GS vs. hyper-RS branching in humans - II

2

± An unobtrusive, informal tradition says that most of the novel artists/scientists showed symptoms

ŽĨƵƚŝƐŵͬ͞ƐƉĞƌŐĞƌ͛ƐĚŝƐŽƌĚĞƌ͘͟/ŶĚŝĂŐŶŽƐĞƐ͕ƐƉĞƌŐŝĂŶƐŐĞƚ͞ĂďŽǀĞĂǀĞƌĂŐĞƚŽĂǀĞƌĂŐĞ/Y͟;ƐĞĞ
part 13, p. 6; if true IQ is measured Aspergians always test higher IQs, as it implies GS logical talent)

Paul Cooijmans summarizes Hans Asperger's definition of Autism/Asperger's syndrome: "It is a narrowing of
one's relation to the world outside¹. It is a disturbance of instinct

2

; an impairment of the ability to relate to or

interact with the outside world in the direct, concrete, instinctive manner that is inborn to the majority of
humans. These instincts are known to originate in the deep-lying ancient structures of the brain that humans
share with other mammals

3

͕ĂŶĚĂƌĞƉŽƉƵůĂƌůLJĐĂůůĞĚΗŵĂŵŵĂůŝĂŶďƌĂŝŶ͞... [In Autistics] Information is

processed in the abstract and logical ways of the intellect, rather than instinctively and concretely.
Communication is intellect-driven, rather than through the direct instinctive channels that bypass intellect
;ŝŶƚŽŶĂƚŝŽŶ͕͚ďŽĚLJůĂŶŐƵĂŐĞ͛Ğ͘Ő͗͘ĨĂĐĞĐƵĞƐͿ͘DĂŶLJŵŽƌĞƐLJŵƉƚŽŵƐƌĞƐƵůƚĨƌŽŵͬĂĐĐŽŵƉĂŶLJƚŚĞĚŝƐƚƵƌďĂŶĐĞ͟

¹ dŚĂƚƉƌŽǀĞƐŚŽǁƚŚĞƵƚŝƐƚ͛ƐƉƐLJĐŚŽůŽŐLJŝƐůĞƐƐĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞ;ƐƚŝŵƵůŝ-) receptive aspects

2

Owing to reduced presence of QRR-Ms i.e. RQ instincts (studied in Parts 8-11).

3

Indeed, see for example the brain areas covered in Part 10. But to call it ͞ŵĂŵŵĂůŝĂŶďƌĂŝŶ͟

is slightly inaccurate. RQ and EQ brain areas are usually of a divergent type than in mammals.

Many laymen also are classifiable as Aspergians, as they use their GS logical talent to think calmly of weighty
matters, though, due to miseducation and schismic factors, they may be typically using the RS class faculties.

± Hyper-RS people seem lost, and are more reactive to shallow verbal/social details (what is seen by

immediate senses), and not the deeper, hidden realities affecting the all. They are quantitatively
reactive to stimuli ʹ ͞ǁŚŝĐŚĐŽŶƐƚŝƚƵƚĞƐ͕͟ƚŚĞLJƵƐƵĂůůLJĐŽŵĞƚŽŐĞƚŚĞƌĂŶĚŵŝůŝƚĂŶƚůLJƉƌŽĐůĂŝŵ͕͞ƚƌƵĞ
ǁŝƐĚŽŵ͘͟EĞŽ-EdĨĂĐƵůƚŝĞƐƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶ;ƌĞͿĂĐƚŝŽŶƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞ͞ůŽŐŝĐĂů͟in a survival frame of reference ʹ
ƚŚĂƚƌĞůĂƚĞƐƚŽĂ͞ƉƌŝŵĂůůŽŐŝĐ͟ŝŶZY;WĂƌƚϵͿ͕ǁŚŝĐŚŽĨƚĞŶƉƌŽĚƵĐĞƐsolution-fetching behaviour, a
hyper-RS behaviour which lacks the GS-ƚLJƉĞĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚŽĨƐŽůǀŝŶŐŽŶĞ͛ƐŽǁŶproblems of life, and
ŝŶƐƚĞĂĚƵƐƵĂůůLJŝŶǀŽůǀĞƐƐĐĂŶŶŝŶŐƐƚŝŵƵůŝĨƌŽŵĞĐŽůŽŐLJƚŽĨŝŶĚĂ͞ƐĂĨĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJ͟ƚŽƉĂƌĂƐŝƚŝĐĂůůLJ
grab a high quantity of low-quality solutions. Autistics carry out problem-solving, not solution-
fetching ʹ they (if allowed) use the GS to live in high quality, but without needing high quantity of
resources. Hyper-GS people have rare reactions to ĐŽŵƉůĞdžŝƚŝĞƐ͙Hyper-RS react to trivial matters.

± dŚƵƐƚŚŽƵŐŚŝƚŝƐƐĂŝĚƚŚĂƚ͞ƐƉĞƌŐĞƌ͛ƐĚŝƐŽƌĚĞƌĂŝůƐƚŚĞĂďƐĞŶƚ-ŵŝŶĚĞĚƉƌŽĨĞƐƐŽƌ͕͟ƚŚĂƚŝƐƚŽƐĞĞƚŚĞ

glass half-empty. It is not that he is absent-minded, but that deeper, subtler things occupy his mind.

To not feel strange about this statement, that there are 2 types of humans (but epigenetics is
rather the key for us, as hyper-RS humans are not so different from hyper-GS humans), we
should see that it is a general law of all evolutionary branching, so defining the animal kingdom.
The primal carnivore branched into 2 the somewhat hyper-GS (individualist) type: feline and the
somewhat hyper-RS (tribal) canid (note: wolf is hyper-RS overall, but not so much so. Its hunting
involves a bit of GS. Except domestic dog or cow, no animal is nearly as hyper-RS as are Neo-NTs)

± Though, as ƐĞĞŶŝŶƚŚĞǁŽůĨ͙ƚŚĞcanid, being caught by a hard fate, took to pragmatic socialism over

self-based individualist survival. Thus some of them, the race of dogs, were vulnerable, and fell to an
artificial domesticative ecology͗͘͘͞hŶůŝŬĞĚŽŐƐ͕ĐĂƚƐŚĂǀĞŶŽƚĐŚĂŶŐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ͞ĚŽŵĞƐƚŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͟step;
ƚŚĞ͚ĚŽŵĞƐƚŝĐĐĂƚ͛ŝƐŶŽƚƌĂĚŝĐĂůůLJĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚĨƌŽŵthe wildcat, and is perfectly able to survive the ǁŝůĚ͘͟

¾ Domesticist vulnerability must characterize hyper-RS (hypo-GS) types, proving ĐĂŶŝĚ͛Ɛ hyper-RS type.
± For example, Ram Gal, Rosenberg, Lior, Libersat et al. (2005) note : ͞The emerald cockroach wasp

stings the host for its larvae (a cockroach). The venom blocks octopamine receptors and the
cockroach fails to show normal escape responses, grooming itself excessively [a receptive behavior of
OCD dandy΁͘/ƚďĞĐŽŵĞƐĚŽĐŝůĞ͖ƚŚĞǁĂƐƉůĞĂĚƐŝƚƚŽŝƚƐĚĞŶďLJƉƵůůŝŶŐŝƚƐĂŶƚĞŶŶĂůŝŬĞĂůĞĂƐŚ͘͟WĞƚ
cats rarely need leashes to keep them OK, but some dogs, if not taught how to be civil, need leashes.
The dog in particular is far more hyper-Z^ƚŚĂŶǁŽůĨ͖ƚŚĞĚŽŐ͛ƐŵĂƐƚĞƌ͕ǁŚŽĐĂŵĞĂĐƌŽƐƐĐŚĞĂƉƐĞĐƌĞƚ

of Pavlovian RS-training aka habit/instinct-ingraining or
domestication (see neuroministers, in Part 14), saw the wolf,
already critically hypo-GS, selfishly; saw not how to train wolf
to be more logical, to preserve and increase self-respect, and
help, be helped, live and let live as a happy, well-regarded
ĨƌŝĞŶĚ͙;ŽƚŚĞƌƐŵĂLJŚĂǀĞʹ saved the wolves, as Tolkien may
ŶŽƚĞĂďŽƵƚ͞tĂƌŐƐ͘͟ƵĞƚŽŝƚƐƵŶŶĂƚƵƌĂůŶĞƐƐ͕ŽŐͬĐŽǁ
suffers unique mental diseases; but men suffer more (Part 13)

The generality of the hyper-RS vs. hyper-GS split: early mammal predator branching

4

͞ŝŐĐĂƚ͟ďƌĂŶĐŚĞĚŝŶƚŽϮĨŽƌŵƐ͗>ĞŽƉĂƌĚ-like, and Lion-like; leopards are clearly more generative. Certainly,
the lion has evolved more Receptive Quotient-type intelligence, which we can call solution-fetching, as it
involves gaining things at the expense of others (female lions, who hunt); leopard has more problem-solving
intelligence. The lion, to an extent a betrayer of the ancient cat's choice, reverted to tribalist intrigues which
require a highly receptive nature ʹ but it would take long to re-implant socialistic instincts, and overcome
ƚŚĞƚŚŽƵŐŚƚĨƵůĐĂƚĚĞƐŝŐŶƵŶĚĞƌŶĞĂƚŚ͘ǀĞŶŶŽǁŝƚŝƐĨĞůŝŶŝĐĂƐƐĞĞŶŝŶƚLJƉŝĐĂůƌŝǀĂůƌLJǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĐĂŶŝĚŝĐŚLJĞŶĂ͙
/ŶĚĞĞĚƚŚĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞƚƌĂŶƐĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĨĞůŝŶĞŽĨŽůĚŝŶƚŽ͞ĐĂŶŝĚŝĐ͟;hyper-RS; in nature, it can only mean the
purer socialist, as syllogical faculty, which is an extreme RS faculty, is missing) is seen in the hyena, who,
though starting as a felinic (hyena is "closer to cat than dog"), has evolved dog like features (hence physical
features are functions of psyche) subsequent to the dog-cat split and victory of felinids over caninids event
in Africa ʹ that biased result caused proto-hyena felinids to join the losing side, unlike lions, which, though
condemned to kill cheetahs, merely have sympathy for the losing side. Though, to be sure, that is extreme in
itself. The lion mugs females and children. The man-eating lion's foolish advance is easily stopped, but man-
ĞĂƚŝŶŐůĞŽƉĂƌĚƐŽƵƚǁŝƚƚŚĞďĞƐƚŚƵŶƚĞƌƐ͕ǁŚŽŝŵŵŽƌƚĂůŝnjĞƚŚĞŵĂƐ͞ĐŽǁĂƌĚƐ͘͟dŚĞůŝŽŶ͕ŚĂǀŝŶŐŶŽŝĚĞĂĂďŽƵƚ
trees, merely runs in hope of prey ʹ leopard is always at thoughtful rest, and merely falls on his prey from
his high throne; thus he eats only the foolish deer; few deer complain regarding this noble friend of Mowgli.

The generality of the hyper-RS vs. hyper-GS split: ͞WƌŝŵŝƚŝǀĞŝŐĂƚ͟ branching

Male lion killing cubs socialist hunting strategy

ŵĂůĞĂůůŝĂŶĐĞ;ŵĂůĞ͞ďŽŶĚŝŶŐ͟ZY

)

The hyper-'^͞ƚĂŬĞƐƉŝƚLJŽŶ͕ĂŶĚĂůůŝĞƐ
ǁŝƚŚ͟ƚŚĞŚLJƉĞƌ-RS side, leading to
ƐƚƌŽŶŐƌĞƐƵůƚƐ͗͞dŚĞŚLJĞŶĂŝƐƚŚĞŵŽƐƚ
social of the Carnivora; it has the
largest groups and most complex social
behaviours. Its social organisation is
unlike that of any other Carnivore,
bearing closer resemblance to that of
baboons and macaques in group-size,
hierarchical structure, and frequency of
ƐŽĐŝĂůŝŶƚĞƌĂĐƚŝŽŶ͟ ʹ by Carlos Monzon

5

Leif Ekblad had covered this subject. The proto-bonobo ape branched into the (hyper-RS) Chimpanzees, and
the (hyper-'^ͿŽŶŽďŽ͘ŚŝŵƉĂŶnjĞĞƐ͞ŬŝůůƐƚƌĂLJŵĂůĞŵĞŵďĞƌƐŽĨƌŝǀĂůƚƌŝďĞƐ͕ŬŝůůĂŶĚĞĂƚŝŶĨĂŶƚƐ͖ƌĂƉĞŝƐ
ĐŽŵŵŽŶ͘͟ƵĨĨLJĞƚĂů͘ŶŽƚĞǁŚĂƚĂŵŽƵŶƚƐƚŽĂĐƌŝƚŝĐĂůƐŝŵŝůĂƌŝƚLJďĞƚǁĞĞŶŚŝŐŚ-RQ human and chimp males:
͞DĂůĞĐŚŝŵƉƐĞdžĐŚĂŶŐĞƉŽůŝƚŝĐĂůƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŶŐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͙͙͙͘͘͟dŚĞďŽŶŽďŽŝƐĐůŽƐĞƐƚƚŽŚƵŵĂŶ
ĂŵŽŶŐĂůůƚŚĞĂƉĞƐ;ƚŚŽƵŐŚŽƌĂŶŐƵƚĂŶŝƐĂůƐŽĨĂŝƌůLJŶŽďůĞͿ͗͞ǁĂůŬƐƵƉƌŝŐŚƚƵŶůŝŬĞĐŚŝŵƉƐ͕͟ĂŶĚŝƐƚŚĞŽŶůLJ
animal apart from man who engages in recreational sex; bonobo is known for more learning capability than
ĐŚŝŵƉ͘EŽƚĞ͗tĞĂƌĞŶŽƚŝŵƉůLJŝŶŐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƵƚŝƐƚŝƐ͞ŵŽƌĞŚƵŵĂŶ͟ƚŚĂŶƚŚĞƐŽƉŚŝƐƚ͘ƵƚƚŚĞŚƵŵĂŶŝƐ
typically more generative than great apes (which are more generative than monkeys), and the Autist is more
ŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŝǀĞƚŚĂŶƚŚĞƐŽƉŚŝƐƚ͘͘͘ďŽƵƚƚŚĞďŽŶŽďŽ͕ƚŚĞŽŶŐŽƉLJŐŵŝĞƐ͞ŚĂǀĞŵĂŶLJůĞŐĞŶĚƐĂďŽƵƚŚŽǁŵĞŶ
and bonobos were allies in the past; how bonobos revealed food to humans or saved humans, how they are
ƚƌLJŝŶŐƚŽĞǀŽůǀĞŝŶƚŽŚƵŵĂŶƐΗ͘͞&ĞŵĂůĞƐŚĂǀĞĂŚŝŐŚĞƌƐƚĂƚƵƐƚŚĂŶŵĂůĞƐ͖ƌĂƉĞƐĂƌĞƌĂƌĞ͖ŵĂůĞƐĚŽŶ͛ƚŬŝůů
ĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶ͕ƌĂŶŬĚŽĞƐŶ͛ƚƉůĂLJĂŵĂũŽƌƌŽůĞƵŶůŝŬĞŝŶŵŽƐƚƉƌŝŵĂƚĞƐŽĐŝĞƚŝĞƐ΀ĐŽŶĨŝƌŵƐůĞĂĚĞƌƐŚŝƉƌŽůĞĨŽƌŵĂŶ͘΁͟

The generality of the hyper-RS vs. hyper-GS split: branching of the Pan Ape

6

Why are both hyper-RS and hyper-GS individuals found in any species? - I

A universal general theory in nature: Even though any species as a whole might drift towards
either hyper-RS type (e.g.: Part 10) or hyper-GS type, hyper-RS and hyper-GS individuals always
coexist in any population. Why?

1.

Everything in the RS is oriented to survival (e.g.: Part 11) and that has various reasons. So obviously it
survived. The hyper-RS could always follow the hyper-GS to a food he found, for ĞdžĂŵƉůĞ͙^ĞĞthe
example of hyenas/lions stealing kills from leopards and cheetahs). In general the hyper-RS mimicked
the hyper-GS with ƵŶĞdžƉĞĐƚĞĚďƵƚĐůĂƐƐŝĐĂůůLJĚŽƉĂŵŝŶŝĐƉƌŽĨŝĐŝĞŶĐLJ͖ďƵƚŝƚǁĂƐŶŽƚĂůǁĂLJƐƉĂƌĂƐŝƚŝĐ͙

2.

An advanced cooperative species especially may pool together RS and GS strengths for easy survival,
as seen in wolves; thus, generally, hyper-GS and hyper-RS complemented each other to benefit all,
just how our own left and right brains, though rivals, are friends cooperating to benefit the user
(similarly all humans must be about glorious mankind). A balance, or, neurodiversity, is profitable to
the species as a whole.

3.

Indeed, probably, especially for cooperative creatures like humans (or, for example, marmots), many
are designed to experience a genetically logical ͞ůŽǀĞĂƚĨŝƌƐƚƐŝŐŚƚ͟-type innocent attraction also to
those ǁŚŽ͛ƌĞĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚ͖ǁĞĂƌĞ͕for example, typically obsessed with unique skills that others have. At
least Autistics are like ƚŚĂƚ͙

± tĞ͛ƌĞĚĞĨŝŶĞĚĂƐ͞ŶŽŶ-ĞƚŚŶŝĐ͟ĂŶĚlike countless healthy friends. But that is not true for everyone.

Hypo-GS tribal programming often involves meta-inbreeding-type insularity and hostility to the
non-͟ĐůĂŶƐŵĂŶ͟ĨŽƌƋƵĂŶƚŝƚĂƚŝǀĞƐƵƌǀŝǀĂů;ƐĞĞfor example Swarm intelligence, in Part 11; and Neo-
NT monkeysphere in Part 12).

4.

The RS faculties based in the left brain, always kept up (in gross design and thus competitiveness)
with the talents of the right brain ďLJ͞ƚĂŬŝŶŐĚŝƉŝŶŚŽůLJǁĂƚĞƌ͖͟ƐĞĞthe end of Part 8 for ĂŶĞdžĂŵƉůĞ͙

5.

Most important cause: Because of the natural logic of the ecology, namely, all species are of equal
competitiveness. Younger children from a given couple are relatively hypo-GS e.g.: Petter <ƌŝƐƚĞŶƐĞŶ͛Ɛ
finding, as Joseph Hall reports: ͞ĞĂĐŚƐƵĐĐĞƐƐŝǀĞĐŚŝůĚŝƐůŝŬĞůLJƚŽhave a little less IQ [Part 13] than the
one ďĞĨŽƌĞ͘͟tŚLJ͍ƵĞƚŽƚŚĞŶĂƚƵƌĂůůŽŐŝĐ: all species are of equal competitiveness ʹ roughly half the
times the elder children did not survive in increased predatory phase... then, the (younger) creature
must ʹ holds pro-entropic design of nature (/genes) ʹ thrive ʹ so, his RS (survivalist ͞ĨĂůƐĞƐĞůĨ͕͟WĂƌƚ
11) is more developed; he is better in the RS and in particular, trilobitist survivalism, than in the GS (in
particular, Lamarckian evolutionarism). Explains the ancient Neo-EdĚŽŐŵĂŝ͘Ğ͘͞ĨŝƌƐƚ-born children
ŵƵƐƚďĞŬŝůůĞĚŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽŵŽƌĂůůLJĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞƚŚĞŵŽƌĂů;ĚŽŵĞƐƚŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŚŽďďŝƚŝnjĂƚŝŽŶŽĨͿŵĂŶŬŝŶĚ͍͟

7

Elaborating upon the theory about the hyper-GS characteristic in the firstborn:

‡

We may logically assume that further production of new, increasingly junior-ranked children

occurred only if death of relatively higher-ranked (meaning, closer to firstborn) children called for
ƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚ͙

‡

If the creatures (children) of a species typically die (beginning with the death of the firstborn child

first -- then, average creature will be junior than firstborn ʹ and -- since evidently the threat to the
species is present -- it was to ensure the survival of at least the junior-birth-ranked ʹ that was the
logic behind why the natural design of creatures ensures relatively higher development of the RS in
junior birth-ranked creatures -- the RS does, after all, facilitate survival at the expense of the finer
aspects of life. Which are to be neglected, now.

‡

If a great massacre (felt of course on the level of the most vulnerable parts of the species i.e.

children) is going on, then the birth rank is lesser on average, and nature wisely fulfills the species'
demand of how such situations call for creatures with more RS development (and early maturation
at the expense of extent of maturity at adulthood).

‡

Species must forget about the luxury of thriving, for which Norepi and the GS must be more, and

should look at merely the bare necessity of surviving, for which the RS or D is more suitable

‡

However, survival under pressure in a species, in this way -- which is quantitative survival, in the

sense that more are successfully surviving by this strategy of design -- reduces the qualitative aspects
of life i.e. the overall rank of the species in the degrees of complexity of life, also known as natural
pyramid, in which pyramid the trilobite is at the lowest rank, and human is traditionally regarded as
being in the highest rank, and that is where human should be).

‡

If the (firstborn) creature survives typically - okay, says the logic of nature, since it can be

afforded/threat levels are low -- better this creature be hyper-GS and evolve into new niches; this is
why GS is preferentially developed in the firstborn of creatures.

‡

This was how humans attained such rapid evolution towards the end -- once humans managed to

ensure survival of their (firstborn) children, they switched to a relatively hyper-GS direction relative
to ancestors.

Why are both hyper-RS and hyper-GS individuals found in any species? - II

8