G22 Outcome Impairment

background image

Functional Outcomes

and Physical

Impairment Rating

Tools in Orthopedic

Trauma

David Hubbard, MD

West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV

Created March 2004; Revised June 2006

background image

Definition of Terms

• Disability
• Permanent impairment
• Handicap

background image

Definitions

• Disability

– assessed by non medical means
– represents an alteration of an

individual’s capacity to meet
personal, social, or occupational
demands or to meet statutory or
regulatory requirements

.

background image

Definitions

• Permanent Impairment

– any anatomic loss or functional

abnormality persisting after
maximum medical improvement
has been achieved.

background image

Definitions

• Handicap

– disadvantages that limit

fulfillment of the an individual’s
usual role.

background image

Your Role as Physician

• Identify objective findings
• Sole responsibility of the physician

to determine permanent
impairment

• Most impairment is caused by

musculoskeletal injuries

background image

Role as Physician

• Care not finished when fractures

healed and rehabilitation finished

• Must participate in the

impairment evaluation process

• Many state/federal laws limit how

a physician assigns ratings

background image

Third-Party Payers

• Often request impairment evaluations

– Use this information to determine

settlement of claims

• Examples: state workman’s

compensation boards, private
insurance companies, Social Security
and Veterans Administration

– Each has their own rules and regulations

background image

Third- Party Payers

• Will ask specific questions about

permanent impairment

• Physicians usually send letters

directly to these payers to provide
updates

background image

Work Restrictions

• Another role of the physician is to

estimate how much and what level of
work or activity a patient can safely
tolerate

• The physician assigns impairment and

work restrictions but it is the third-
party payers’ and the patient’s
responsibility to find the appropriate
job

background image

Work Restrictions

• Most commonly used guidelines are those

of the Social Security Administration:

• Consist of differing levels of physical

activity

– Very heavy
– Heavy
– Medium
– Light
– Sedentary

background image

Work Restrictions

Very heavy work is that which involves

lifting objects weighing more than 100 lb at
a time, with frequent lifting or carrying of
objects weighing 50 lb or more

Heavy work involves the lifting of no more

than 100 lb at a time, with frequent lifting
or carrying of objects weighing up to 50 lb.

Medium work involves the lifting of no

more than 50 lb at a time, with frequent
lifting or carrying of objects weighing up to
25 lb

background image

Work Restrictions

Light work involves lifting no more

than 25 lb at a time, with frequent
lifting or carrying of objects weighing
up to 10 lb.

Sedentary work involves the lifting of

no more than 10 lb at a time and
occasional lifting or carrying of small
items

.

background image

Work Restrictions

• Work restrictions should be placed at

a level that does not compromise
healing or cause too much discomfort
during the recovery phase of injury

• Once maximum medical improvement

has been reached if patient is unable
to return to previous job then
permanent restrictions should be set.

background image

Modern Impairment

Scales

• Most widely used:
• AMA’s Guide to the Evaluation of

Permanent Impairment

• AAOS’s Manual for Orthopedic

Surgeons in Evaluating Permanent
Physical Impairment

background image

AMA’s Guide

• “Whole man” concept
• Each part of body assigned a

percentage of its contribution to the
whole

• Loss of function of an extremity is

expressed as percentage of the value of
the whole extremity, then the
impairment of the whole man is
calculated from this.

background image

AMA’s Guide

• Lower extremity is 40% of whole

man

• Upper extremity is 60%
• Other than amputation the ratings

are based solely on the residual
range of motion and does not
consider factors like pain, limb
shortening, or weakness

background image

AAOS’ Manual

• This considers loss of motion like

the AMA’s guide but also takes
into account pain separately

• Four grades of pain: Mild to

severe

background image

AAOS’s Manual

Mild pain (Grade I) – does not contribute to

impairment

Moderate pain (Grade II) – might require

treatment and does contribute to a minor

degree to impairment

Severe pain (Grade III) – pathological changes

and clinical findings indicate that pain is

contributing significantly to impairment

Very severe pain (Grade IV) – physical

impairment is nearly complete secondary to

pain

background image

Temporary Impairment

• Temporary total disability
• Temporary partial disability

background image

Temporary Total Disability

• Starts at time of injury
• Lasts until patient achieves a reasonable

degree of mobility and independence,
can perform ADL’s reasonably

• Patient must be off narcotics
• Must be evaluated by physician

periodically to document/update
progress

background image

Temporary Partial

Disability

• Starts at the end of temporary total

disability

• Lasts until patient back to normal

function or a permanent impairment
is assigned

• May return to work with restrictions
• Must be reevaluated by physician

background image

Fractures and Associated

Impairments

• Increased impairment may be

assigned based on the following:

1) Handiness (dominant vs

nondominant upper extremity
injury)

2) Nonunion
3) Limb length discrepancy
4) Malunion

background image

Fractures and Associated

Impairments

5) Infection
6) intra articular involvement
7) Associated neurological injury
8) Preexisting osteoarthritis
9) Spine fractures

background image

Functional Outcomes

• Traditional orthopedic evaluations

in the past have focused on
impairment measures

• These include findings like range of

motion, muscle strength, and
radiographic healing

• These findings have the advantage

of being easy to measure

background image

Functional Outcomes

• Disadvantage is that they do not

consider the patient’s opinion of
the success or failure of treatment

background image

Functional Outcomes

• The focus of outcomes assessment

has now shifted to patient-based
subjective assessments of outcome

• A combination of impairment and

patient-based assessment is probably
the ideal measure of outcome

Patient satisfactions is very

important!

background image

Functional Outcomes

• Up until recently the focus of most

orthopedic literature has been
based on clinical outcomes

• Ultimate outcome however, should

be a combination of clinical,
functional, health-related
outcomes, and satisfaction with
care.

background image

Functional Outcomes

Clinical outcomes are what we are

used to (range of motion, union, etc.)

Functional outcomes are total patient

outcome, not just the injured part.

Include:

– mental health
– social function
– role function,
– physical function
– ADL’s

background image

Functional Outcomes

Health-related functions are the

patient’s perception of how they
are functioning based on their
overall health.

background image

Clinical Outcomes in

Trauma

• The trauma registry is the main

source of collected data at most
institutions.

• The American College of Surgeons

Committee on Trauma has made
recommendations on what data
should be collected and evaluated

background image

Clinical Outcomes in

Trauma

• One of the key components is measure

of ISS (Injury Severity Score)

– Not a good measure for most orthopedic

injuries

• OTA has developed their own software

to track orthopedic injuries more

completely

• Extensive resources required for

appropriate data collection

background image

Clinical Outcomes in

Trauma

• Unrealistic to collect functional

outcome data on all trauma
patients

• Multicenter studies are the wave

of the future for outcomes
research

background image

Health-Related Quality-of-

Life Instruments in

Common Use for

Musculoskeletal Problems

• Medical Outcomes Study Short Form

36 (SF-36)

• Sickness Impact Profile (SIP)
• Western Ontario and McMaster

University Osteoarthritis Index
(WOMAC)

• Nottingham Health Profile

background image

Quality-of-Life Instruments

(cont)

• Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB)
• Musculoskeletal Functional

Assessment (MFA)

• AAOS Instruments

background image

Summary

• Our goal should be to fairly

identify our patient’s impairments,
assist in disability evaluation, and
begin assessing patient’s
outcomes based on their
perceptions as well as our
objective findings

background image

Thank You

Return to

General/Principles

Index

E-mail OTA

about

Questions/Comments

If you would like to volunteer as an

author for the Resident Slide Project

or recommend updates to any of the

following slides, please send an e-mail

to

ota@aaos.org


Document Outline


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
Early clinical and radiological outcomes after double osteotomy
29 G22 H18 DISASTER PLAN Pandemic flu PL poprawione
guiso sapienza zingales 2006 Does culture affect economic outcomes
OUTCOMES Intermediate Answer Key
personality outcomes
Childhood sexual abuse predicts poor outcome seven years after parasuicide
Impaired Sexual Function in Patients with BPD is Determined by History of Sexual Abuse
Walther G22
Use of clinical and impairment based tests to predict falls by community dwelling older adults
29 G22 H18 DISASTER PLAN Pandemic flu PL poprawione
Economic Outcomes in the Great Migration
Psychiatric Impairment Among Adolescents Engaging in Different Types of Deliberate Self Harm
Using wireless technology in clinical practice does feedback of daily walking activity improve walki
Outcome list of President Xi Jinping s state visit to the United States People s Daily Online
SEX EDUCATION ATTITUDES AND OUTCOMES
Meiser, Hewstone Illusory and spurious correlations distinct phenomena or joint outcomes of exempl
Contrasting Clients in Dialectical Behavior Therapy for BPD Marie and Dean , Two Caseswith Diffe

więcej podobnych podstron