-66-
be lcwer than its melting temperature-in or out of the lyophilization chamber during the fuli freeze-drying treat-ment. We determined freezing points of PEG/water mixtures by recording the cooling ratę of samples put in a dewar filled with liąuid air. For all the grades tested (PEG400, -600, -1000 from Huls Chemie, Belgium; PEG1500 from Union Carbide, London, Great Britain), an Et of at least -40°C may be expected.
Influence of PEG Grade and Concentration
A piece of sole leather from a 16th century shoe, excavated in Brussels, was cleaned and cut in equal parts. Each piece was impregnated in either 30% or 50% (c/v) PEG of the grades 400, 600, 1000 and 1500, for six weeks at room temperaturę. Two samples were put in distilled water and were further treated in a similar way. After impregnation, the pieces were blotted, measured, and frożen at -80°C for 3 hours. Lyophilization was performed over 15 hours, where-by an end pressure of 30m Torr was reached; the lyophilized samples were weighed immediately and were conditioned in a controlled atmosphere (55% RH and 21°C) until they reached a constant weight. Frcm Table 3, it follows that the dimen-sional change of each sample under either treatment is negligible. The rehydration was less effective for a higher polymerization grade or a higher concentration, except with PEG400.
Table 3: eyaluation of the condition of leather, in functions of the impregnation medium
impregnation
medium
30%PEG400 50%PEG400 30%PEG600 50%PEG600 30%PEG1000 50%PEG1000 30%PEG1500 50%PEG1500 H20
h2o
dimensional change (%)
+2
0
0
+1
-2
+1
0
0
-15
-12
Suppleness and visual aspect were very gocd for all treated samples. Impregnations with 50%PEG of any grade tended to make the leather darker and stiffer, expect for PEG400, where no difference was noticed. The untreated samples were hard, almost non-pliable, but lighter in color. Impregnation with 50% PEG caused the samples to feel moist to the touch under the atmospheric conditions described above. Shrinkage was minimized by both higher PEG concentrations and lower prefreezing temperatures. In 50% PEG400, it did not seem necessary to prefreeze the sample at all.
Influence of PEG Concentration and Prefreezing Conditions
Samples of a sole from a 16th century shoe from the same excavation in Brussels were cut and impregnated in either 20%-, 35%-, or 50% PEG400 in water (v/v) for 6 weeks at room temperaturę. Before lyophilization, the pieces were kept at either room temperaturę, -20°C, or 80°C for 15 hours. Freeze-drying and climatization were performed as previously described. The results are given in Table 4.
Table 4: ęyaluation of the condition ofleather, in function of PEG400 concentration and prefreezing temperaturę
impregnation |
prefreezing |
dimensional |
water |
medium |
temperaturę |
(°C) change (%) |
uptake (%) |
H20 |
RT |
-12.7 |
13.7 |
20% PEG400 |
RT |
- 7.3 |
12.7 |
35% PEG400 |
RT |
- 3.3 |
12.1 |
50% PEG400 |
RT |
- 1 .4 |
12.0 |
H20 |
-20 |
-10.1 |
14.2 |
20% PEG400 |
-20 |
- 4.7 |
13.0 |
35% PEG400 |
-20 |
- 1 .7 |
10.8 |
50% PEG400 |
-20 |
- 0.5 |
9.5 |
H20 |
-80 |
-10.6 |
14.5 |
20% PEG400 |
-80 |
- 5.2 |
13.0 |
35% PEG400 |
-80 |
- 1 .1 |
12.3 |
50% PEG400 |
-80 |
- 0.2 |
9.5 |