1254394679

1254394679



84

presented here as least square means ± s.e.m. for linear parameters and as medians for ordinal variables. Residuals were tested for normality using the one sample Kolmogorov-Smimov test.

3.5 Results

3.5.1 Treatment effect

On the day of first capture nonę of the dependent variables we investigated differed among futurę experimental treatments (group effect: p = 0.1-0.8). Similarly, individuals that were recaptured later did not differ in any of these variables at first measure from individuals that were never seen again (p = 0.5-0.9).

Average body mass was not afTected by size (p = 0.2) and did not differ between groups (p = 0.1) but did vary with time of capture (Fj^35 5.6, p < 0.05) and period (Fi,69= 5.8, p < 0.05). The interaction term period*group was also close to significance (F|,68= 3.4, p = 0.07) indicating a trend where control individuals gained body mass between periods while clipped birds did not (figurę 3.2). Independent analyses per group confirmed this trend, showing that control birds were on average 2.9% heavier after the treatment than before (Fi,45 = 15.0, p < 0.001) while clipped birds maintained a constant body mass throughout the winter (p = 0.9) (figurę 3.2).

Fat scores did not vary between periods (p = 0.5) or groups (p = 0.09) and were not affected by the period*group interaction (p = 0.7).

Analysis of pectoral muscle score showed that both groups (X2 = 6.1, df = 1; p < 0.05) and periods (X2 = 5.7, df = 1; p < 0.05) were significant but that the group effect also tended to depend on the period (period*group: p = 0.07). Clipped birds had larger muscles on average (median = 3) than Controls (median = 2). However, when considering the interaction trend, at first capture both control and clipped individuals expressed a median muscle score of 2. After the treatment, clipped birds had larger pectoral muscles (median = 3) compared to control birds measured either before or after the treatment (median = 2) (figurę 3.3). Therefore the significant group effect seemed driven mainly by an increase in pectoral muscle size in the clipped group between periods.



Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
2014-12-16PLS ►    PLS - partial least squares, metoda
image050 xJ hi Data Needed for Casson Calculations This program calculates a least-squares fil of ra
LIST <U HERE New!! Build yourown PCs. ¥ 10 Band p@rtable! Air Band Receh/er Llsten to the alr
dpp52 S1NGI.E-HANDED Dl/MB-BELL SWING The musctes called into play are practically the sanie here&nb
Ordinary Least Squares
47632 Tomicus minor 1 (2) Notę: In T. minor the second row of setae is complete present here JW
29 (627) 83.84 MflSW j *a«i»ssa as -    • *i 8S$«tt*iix: £ AtS«tt •
85 Figurę 3.2 Variation in body mass over the experimental period. Data are least sąuare means of bo
105 Figurę 4.1 Seasonal variation in body composition throughout the year. Data are least square mea
44 (61) 84 V **n ł” ffr A <f arc 1° ♦ sin ¥ cos1 2 (fk AD2 arc2 i°)aA♦ 2~ą »«*f# cot2^ AA3 arc2 1
Metoda najmniejszych kwadratów (ang. ordinary least squares - OLS) jest najprostszym i najpopularnie
84 presence des phycobiliproteines. L’absorbance a 620 nm peut etre utilisee pour estimer ies change
crello ^ Saved A Presentation (4-3) 1024x768 px * GD cL Download □□ Object Fili X Designs U
Egzamin testowy z ekonometrii (przykładowy test z lat ubiegłych) Tablica 1. Ordinary Least Squares E

więcej podobnych podstron