2949775325
Comparison of Liąuid Propellant Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 11
According to the previously exposed, the batteries mass must be estimated with both factors, and it must be chosen as best estimator the one yielding the greatest value. That is why the mass can be determined with the next equation set:
a f |
a o |
| K |
(2.6.3) |
Ji Pltf V/MO y |
\n „v,mstap |
|
k„ |
(2.6.4) |
Pm |
O |
|
V •"’*»■) |
|
(2.6.5) |
where kb is a safety factor to consider during the system sizing.
2.7. Gas generator mass
The parameters derived from combustion chamber design approaches usually result too smali, because the combustion characteristics inside a gas generator (GG) are quite different [5], To get a good volume estimation the guidelines proposed in [5] were followed. A GG with spherical shape was adopted and the stay time method was used. The GG chamber volume was estimated using the next expression:
where, ts: Stay time (s).
mplu: GG propellant buming mass (kg). pgg: GG exhaut gases density (kg/m3).
Vgg-. GG chamber volume (m3).
From the obtained volume and accepting a spherical GG, their surface can be calculated. In addition, utilizing the Laplace's Law is possible to calculate the GG wali thickness. The formulas to do those calculations are presented be Iow:
, 4 , |
|
|
(2.7.2) |
?.»=4>rr« |
(2.7.3) |
- k ^88 rgg |
(2.7.4) |
|
|
where, GG chamber surface (m2). rgg: GG chamber radius (m). egg: GG chamber wali thickness (m). kgg: GG chamber wali thickness safety factor. Pgg: GG chamber pressure (Pa).
Ogg: GG chamber wali materiał UTS (Pa).
Wyszukiwarka
Podobne podstrony:
Comparison of Liąuid Propellant Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 12 Finally, combining the above expComparison of Liąuid Propellant Rocket Engine Feed Systems -1-9 At this point, is convenient to refeComparison of Liąuid Propellant Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 10 meepopllc 1 SLV (2.4.3) ReplacinComparison of Liąuid Propellant Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 15 The turbinę inlet gases are to aComparison of Liąuid Propellant Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 16 3.7. Materials It is necessary tComparison of Liąuid Propellant Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 1 REPORT N21COMPARISON OF LIOUID PRComparison of Liąuid Propellant Rocket Engine Feed Systems -1-2 CONTENTS I.Comparison of Liąuid Propellant Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 3 I. INTRODUCTION Since several decComparison of Liąuid Propellant Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 4 current from the battery to altemComparison of Liąuid Propellcmt Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 5 where, my. Pressurizing gas massComparison of Liąuid Propellant Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 6 0/F mf pfvf - -mp = mppa \+OIF) 1Comparison of Liąnid Propellant Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 8 2.2.2. Propellant tank mass In aComparison ofLiąuid Propellant Rocket Engine Feed Systems -1-7 (N II £ (2.2.2) where, Ap: SphereComparison ofLiąuid Pr opel fant Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 13 . gg-RTin (2.9.4) where, Rgg: TComparison ofLiguid Pr opel font Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 14 For each calculation routine, iComparison ofLiąuid PropeUant Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 17 Figurę 2: Synchronous motor specifComparison ofLiąuid Pr opel lani Rocket Engine Feed Systems - 1 - 18 Table 6: Proposed batteries tResearch Report.ELECTRIC FEED SYSTEMS FOR LIQUID PROPELLANT ROCKET ENGINES.Pablo Rachov, HernanRESEARCH REPORTSELECTRIC FEED SYSTEMS FOR LIOUID PROPELLANT ROCKET ENGINESPablo RACHOV LABORATOwięcej podobnych podstron