background image

Industrial

 

Crops

 

and

 

Products

 

76

 

(2015)

 

1100–1105

Contents

 

lists

 

available

 

at

 

ScienceDirect

Industrial

 

Crops

 

and

 

Products

j o

 

u

 

r

 

n

 

a l

 

h o m e p

 

a g e :

 

w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / i n d c r o p

Chemical

 

composition,

 

biological

 

and

 

cytotoxic

 

activities

 

of

 

Cistus

salviifolius

 

flower

 

buds

 

and

 

leaves

 

extracts

Salma

 

Kammoun

 

El

 

Euch

a

,

b

,

c

,

 

Jalloul

 

Bouajila

c

,

,

 

Nabiha

 

Bouzouita

a

,

b

,

∗∗

a

Ecole

 

Supérieure

 

des

 

Industries

 

Alimentaires,

 

58,

 

Avenue

 

Alain

 

Savary,

 

1003,

 

Cité

 

El-Khadra,

 

Tunis,

 

Tunisie

b

Laboratoire

 

de

 

Chimie

 

Organique

 

Structurale:

 

Synthèse

 

et

 

Etude

 

Physicochimique-Faculté

 

des

 

sciences

 

de

 

Tunis,

 

Tunisie

c

Université

 

de

 

Toulouse,

 

Université

 

Paul-Sabatier,

 

Faculté

 

de

 

pharmacie

 

de

 

Toulouse,

 

Laboratoire

 

des

 

IMRCP

 

UMR

 

CNRS

 

5623,

 

118

 

route

 

de

 

Narbonne,

F-31062

 

Toulouse,

 

France

a

 

r

 

t

 

i

 

c

 

l

 

e

 

i

 

n

 

f

 

o

Article

 

history:

Received

 

11

 

May

 

2015

Received

 

in

 

revised

 

form

 

22

 

July

 

2015

Accepted

 

15

 

August

 

2015

Available

 

online

 

27

 

August

 

2015

Keywords:
Cistus

 

salviifolius

Leaves
Flower

 

buds

Antioxidant

 

activity

Biological

 

activities

Cytotoxicity

a

 

b

 

s

 

t

 

r

 

a

 

c

 

t

The

 

chemical

 

composition,

 

antioxidant

 

activity

 

(DPPH

,

 

ABTS

•+

and

 

FRAP

 

assays),

 

anti-xanthine

 

oxydase

(XOD),

 

anti-superoxide

 

dismutase

 

(SOD),

 

anti-acetylcholinesterase

 

(AChE),

 

anti-inflammatory

 

(anti-5-

lipoxygenase

 

(5-LOX))

 

and

 

cytotoxic

 

(OVCAR

 

and

 

MCF-7)

 

activities

 

comparison

 

between

 

the

 

leaves

 

and

the

 

flower

 

buds

 

(FB)

 

of

 

Cistus

 

salviifolius

 

separately

 

extracted

 

with

 

methanol

 

(MeOH)

 

80%

 

was

 

inves-

tigated.

 

The

 

highest

 

phenolics

 

content

 

(305.30

±4.68

 

mg

 

gallic

 

acid

 

equivalent

 

(E)/g

 

dry

 

weight

 

(dw))

and

 

flavonoids

 

(76.21

 

±

 

1.26

 

mg

 

quercetin

 

E/g

 

dw)

 

were

 

obtained

 

in

 

FB

 

extract,

 

however,

 

the

 

leaves

 

has

nine

 

times

 

higher

 

amount

 

of

 

tannins

 

(56.36

 

±

 

0.67

 

mg

 

catechin

 

E/g

 

dw)

 

and

 

more

 

important

 

concentra-

tion

 

of

 

anthocyanins

 

(0.31

 

±

 

0.02

 

mg

 

cyaniding-3-glucoside

 

E/g

 

dw).

 

It

 

was

 

found

 

that

 

FB

 

methanolic

extract

 

exhibited

 

better

 

antioxidant

 

(IC

50

=

 

5.11

 

±

 

0.53,

 

4.82

 

±

 

0.08

 

and

 

59.27

 

±

 

0.13

 

mg/L

 

assessed

 

by

DPPH

,

 

ABTS

•+

and

 

FRAP

 

tests,

 

respectively)

 

and

 

anti-SOD

 

(IP

 

(%)

 

=

 

58.39

 

±

 

11.67)

 

activities

 

than

 

leaves

extract.

 

Moreover,

 

FB

 

possessed

 

more

 

evident

 

cytotoxic

 

activity

 

against

 

OVCAR

 

and

 

MCF-7

 

cells

 

(IP

(%)

 

=

 

36.85

 

±

 

5.66

 

and

 

35.16

 

±

 

4.67%,

 

respectively)

 

in

 

comparison

 

to

 

leaves

 

which

 

were

 

inactive

 

at

 

a

 

con-

centration

 

of

 

50

 

mg/L.

 

However,

 

leaves

 

showed

 

more

 

powerful

 

inhibitory

 

activities

 

towards

 

the

 

enzymes

AChE

 

(IC

50

=

 

18

 

±

 

2.71

 

mg/L),

 

5-LOX

 

(IC

50

=

 

13.38

 

±

 

0.20

 

mg/L)

 

and

 

XOD

 

(IC

50

=

 

19.48

 

±

 

0.21

 

mg/L).

 

Results

showed

 

that

 

the

 

organ

 

factor

 

influenced

 

considerably

 

the

 

chemical

 

composition

 

content

 

and

 

the

 

biological

activities

 

of

 

C.

 

salviifolius.

©

 

2015

 

Elsevier

 

B.V.

 

All

 

rights

 

reserved.

1.

 

Introduction

The

 

Cistaceae

 

family,

 

known

 

as

 

rock-rose,

 

is

 

a

 

large

 

family

of

 

perennial

 

shrubs

 

commonly

 

distributed

 

in

 

the

 

Mediterranean

semi-arid

 

ecosystem

 

(

Tomas-Menor

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013

).

 

Most

 

species

 

of

this

 

family,

 

characterized

 

with

 

fragrant

 

and

 

sweet

 

smelling,

 

are

much

 

appreciated

 

in

 

the

 

perfume

 

industry

 

(

Ben

 

Jemia

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013;

Abbreviations:

 

DPPH,

 

1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl;

 

ABTS,

 

2,2’-azinobis-3-

ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic

 

acid;

 

FRAP,

 

Ferric

 

reducing

 

antioxidant

 

power;

XOD,

 

xanthine

 

oxidase;

 

SOD,

 

superoxide

 

dismutase;

 

AChE,

 

acetylcholinesterase;

5-LOX,

 

5-lipoxygenase;

 

MeOH,

 

methanol;

 

FB,

 

flower

 

buds;

 

dw,

 

dry

 

weight;

 

TPC,

total

 

phenolic

 

content;

 

FC,

 

folin

 

Ciocalteu;

 

TFC,

 

total

 

flavonoid

 

content;

 

CTC,

 

con-

densed

 

tannin

 

content;

 

TAC,

 

total

 

anthocyanin

 

content;

 

GAE,

 

gallic

 

acid

 

equivalent;

QE,

 

quercetin

 

equivalent;

 

CE,

 

catechin

 

equivalent;

 

C-3GE,

 

cyanidin-3-glucoside

equivalent;

 

NDGA,

 

nordihydroguaiaretic

 

acid;

 

MTT,

 

3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-

2,5-diphenyltetrazolium

 

bromide;

 

PBS,

 

phosphate

 

buffered

 

saline.

∗ Corresponding

 

author.

 

Fax:

 

+33

 

5622

 

56826.

∗∗ Corresponding

 

author.

 

Fax:

 

+21

 

6711

 

71192.

E-mail

 

addresses:

 

jalloul.bouajila@univ-tlse3.fr

 

(J.

 

Bouajila),

bouzouita.nabiha@gmail.com

 

(N.

 

Bouzouita).

Loizzo

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013;

 

Tomas-Menor

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013

)

 

and

 

for

 

ornamen-

tal

 

purposes

 

(

Ben

 

Jemia

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013

).

 

Cistus

 

species

 

have

 

been

used

 

since

 

ancient

 

times

 

in

 

traditional

 

folk

 

medicine

 

(

Barrajón-

Catalán

 

et

 

al.,

 

2010

)

 

as

 

anti-inflammatory

 

(

Demetzos

 

et

 

al.,

 

2001

),

anti-ulcerogenic,

 

wound

 

healing,

 

anti-microbial

 

(

Demetzos

 

et

 

al.,

1999

),

 

antifungal

 

(

Bayoub

 

et

 

al.,

 

2010

),

 

antiviral,

 

anti-tumor

 

(

Dimas

et

 

al.,

 

2000

),

 

cytotoxic

 

(

Ben

 

Jemia

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013

)

 

and

 

anti-nociceptive

(

Barrajón-Catalán

 

et

 

al.,

 

2010

).

Among

 

the

 

Cistaceae

 

family,

 

Cistus

 

salviifolius

 

L.,

 

a

 

shrub

 

belongs

to

 

the

 

Leucocistus

 

subgenus,

 

is

 

traditionally

 

used

 

as

 

an

 

astringent

and

 

cicatrizing

 

agent

 

in

 

some

 

countries

 

of

 

the

 

Mediterranean

 

area

in

 

addition

 

to

 

being

 

used

 

as

 

a

 

tea

 

substitute

 

(

Quer,

 

2005

).

 

In

 

Jor-

dan,

 

it

 

has

 

been

 

utilized

 

for

 

the

 

treatment

 

of

 

gout

 

(

Al-Khalil,

 

1995

)

which

 

develops

 

because

 

of

 

the

 

deposition

 

of

 

uric

 

acid

 

in

 

the

 

form

of

 

urate

 

monohydrate

 

crystals

 

in

 

the

 

synovial

 

joints

 

during

 

purine

catabolism

 

by

 

xanthine

 

oxidase

 

(XOD)

 

(

Owen

 

and

 

Johns,

 

1999

),

which

 

catalyses

 

the

 

conversion

 

of

 

hypoxanthine

 

to

 

xanthine

 

and

xanthine

 

to

 

uric

 

acid

 

with

 

concomitant

 

production

 

of

 

hydrogen

 

per-

oxides

 

and

 

superoxides

 

anions

 

as

 

byproducts

 

(

Batelli

 

et

 

al.,

 

1999

).

Constituents

 

from

 

C.

 

salvifolius

 

(Cistaceae)

 

activate

 

also

 

peroxisome

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.08.033

0926-6690/©

 

2015

 

Elsevier

 

B.V.

 

All

 

rights

 

reserved.

background image

S.K.

 

El

 

Euch

 

et

 

al.

 

/

 

Industrial

 

Crops

 

and

 

Products

 

76

 

(2015)

 

1100–1105

 

1101

Table

 

1

Extraction

 

yields

 

determination.

Reference

 

Extraction

 

yields

 

(%)

FB

 

30.20

L

 

21.80

FB:

 

Flower

 

buds;

 

L:

 

Leaves.

proliferator-activated

 

receptor-y

 

and

 

stimulate

 

glucose

 

uptake

 

by

adipocytes

 

(

Kühn

 

et

 

al.,

 

2011

).

 

Research

 

in

 

Turkey

 

showed

 

that

C.

 

salviifolius

 

possess

 

great

 

efficacy

 

towards

 

ulcers

 

(

Yesilada

 

et

 

al.,

1999

).

 

As

 

it

 

has

 

been

 

demonstrated,

 

in

 

Marocco,

 

that

 

it

 

exhibited

anti-mycobacterial

 

activity

 

against

 

Mycobacterium

 

aurum

 

A+

 

and

Mycobacterium

 

smegmatis

 

MC2

 

155

 

(

Haouat

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013

).

Cyclohexane

 

carboxylic

 

acids

 

(quinic

 

and

 

shikimic

 

acids),

flavanols

 

(catechins),

 

betuloside

 

(rhododendrin),

 

ellagitannins

(punicalagins)

 

and

 

glycosylated

 

flavonols

 

(myricetin

 

and

 

quercetin

glycosides)

 

were

 

the

 

most

 

abundant

 

compounds

 

in

 

C.

 

salviifolius

growing

 

in

 

Spain

 

(

Tomas-Menor

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013

).

 

Saracini

 

et

 

al.

 

(2005)

have

 

reported

 

that

 

the

 

simultaneous

 

presence

 

of

 

ellagitannins,

 

and

flavonoid

 

glycosides,

 

may

 

preserve

 

sensitive

 

targets

 

in

 

C.

 

salvi-

ifolius

 

leaves

 

from

 

photochemical

 

damage

 

and

 

as

 

a

 

consequence,

this

 

plant

 

not

 

only

 

serve

 

a

 

key

 

ecological

 

function

 

in

 

the

 

stabiliza-

tion

 

of

 

highly-disturbed

 

ecosystems,

 

but

 

may

 

be

 

a

 

very

 

interesting,

and

 

still

 

not

 

fully

 

explored,

 

source

 

of

 

metabolites

 

with

 

potential

 

use

in

 

human

 

health

 

care.

The

 

aim

 

of

 

the

 

presented

 

study

 

was

 

to

 

evaluate

 

and

 

com-

pare

 

leaves

 

and

 

flower

 

buds

 

of

 

C.

 

salviifolius

 

separately

 

extracted

with

 

MeOH

 

80%

 

in

 

terms

 

of

 

(1)

 

their

 

total

 

content

 

of

 

phe-

nolics,

 

flavonoids,

 

tannins,

 

and

 

anthocyanins

 

and

 

(2)

 

their

antioxidant

 

(DPPH

,

 

ABTS

•+

,

 

FRAP),

 

anti-inflammatory,

 

anti-

acetylcholinesterase,

 

anti-superoxide

 

dismutase,

 

anti-xanthine

oxidase,

 

and

 

cytotoxic

 

activities

 

(see

 

also

 

El

 

Euch

 

et

 

al.,

 

2014

).

 

To

our

 

knowledge,

 

no

 

studies

 

have

 

been

 

performed

 

on

 

the

 

flower

 

buds

of

 

C.

 

salviifolius.

2.

 

Materials

 

and

 

methods

2.1.

 

Chemicals

 

used

All

 

the

 

chemicals

 

used

 

were

 

of

 

the

 

analytical

 

reagent

 

grade.

All

 

reagents

 

were

 

purchased

 

from

 

Sigma–Aldrich–Fluka

 

(Saint-

Quentin,

 

France).

2.2.

 

Plant

 

material

 

collection

C.

 

salviifolius

 

leaves

 

and

 

flower

 

buds

 

(FB)

 

were

 

collected

 

in

 

March

2013

 

from

 

Nahli

 

mount

 

located

 

in

 

Ariana

 

governorship

 

in

 

Tunisia.

The

 

material

 

was

 

authenticated

 

by

 

Dr

 

Nadia

 

Ben

 

Brahim

 

(botanical

laboratory

 

and

 

ornamental

 

plants,

 

National

 

Institute

 

for

 

Agricul-

ture

 

Research

 

in

 

Tunis)

 

and

 

voucher

 

specimens

 

were

 

deposited

 

in

laboratory

 

of

 

valorisation

 

of

 

natural

 

substances

 

in

 

High

 

School

 

of

Food

 

Industries

 

in

 

Tunis.

2.3.

 

Methanolic

 

extract

 

preparation

Leaves

 

and

 

FB

 

were

 

separately

 

subjected

 

to

 

extraction

 

with

MeOH

 

80%.

 

25

 

g

 

of

 

dried

 

and

 

pulverised

 

plant

 

material

 

were

 

three

times

 

macerated

 

(for

 

24

 

h

 

each)

 

under

 

orbital

 

shaking

 

with

 

250

 

mL

of

 

solvent.

 

Extracts

 

were

 

combined,

 

filtered

 

and

 

evaporated

 

to

 

dry-

ness

 

under

 

vacuum

 

at

 

40

C.

 

The

 

residue

 

amount

 

was

 

weighed

 

and

expressed

 

in

 

Table

 

1

 

as

 

follows:

EY(%)

 

=



M

1

 

M

0

m



×

 

100

where

 

EY

 

is

 

the

 

yield,

 

in

 

percentage,

 

of

 

the

 

dry

 

residue

 

amount

extraction;

 

M

1

is

 

the

 

weight,

 

in

 

grams,

 

of

 

the

 

residue

 

and

 

the

 

round

bottomed

 

flask

 

after

 

vacuum

 

evaporation;

 

M

0

is

 

the

 

weight,

 

in

grams,

 

of

 

the

 

empty

 

round

 

bottomed

 

flask;

 

and

 

m

 

is

 

the

 

weight,

in

 

grams,

 

of

 

the

 

test

 

sample.

 

Extracts

 

were

 

kept

 

in

 

amber

 

vials

 

and

stored

 

at

 

−18

C

 

for

 

further

 

analysis.

2.4.

 

Total

 

phenolic

 

content

 

determination

The

 

total

 

phenolic

 

content

 

(TPC)

 

of

 

the

 

different

 

extracts

 

was

assessed

 

by

 

spectrometry

 

using

 

the

 

“Folin

 

Ciocalteu”

 

(FC)

 

reagent

assay

 

(

Bekir

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013a

).

 

20

 

␮L

 

of

 

the

 

diluted

 

extract

 

solution

 

was

mixed

 

with

 

100

 

␮L

 

of

 

FC

 

reagent

 

(0.2N).

 

The

 

mixture,

 

prepared

in

 

96-well

 

plate,

 

was

 

agitated

 

for

 

30

 

s

 

and

 

rested

 

in

 

the

 

darkness

for

 

5

 

min.

 

80

 

␮L

 

of

 

Na

2

CO

3

(75

 

g/L)

 

was

 

added.

 

After

 

agitation

 

and

incubation

 

during

 

15

 

min,

 

the

 

absorbance

 

was

 

measured

 

at

 

765

 

nm.

Gallic

 

acid

 

(GA)

 

(0–30

 

mg/L)

 

was

 

used

 

as

 

a

 

standard

 

for

 

the

 

calibra-

tion

 

curve.

 

The

 

total

 

phenolic

 

content

 

was

 

expressed

 

as

 

milligram

of

 

GA

 

equivalent

 

per

 

gram

 

of

 

dry

 

weight

 

(mg

 

GAE/g

 

dw).

2.5.

 

Total

 

flavonoid

 

content

 

determination

Total

 

flavonoid

 

content

 

(TFC)

 

was

 

measured

 

according

 

to

 

Bekir

et

 

al.

 

(2013a)

 

method.

 

Each

 

extract

 

solution

 

(100

 

␮L)

 

was

 

mixed

with

 

an

 

equal

 

volume

 

of

 

2%

 

AlCl

3

methanolic

 

solution.

 

After

 

incu-

bation

 

for

 

15

 

min,

 

the

 

absorption

 

was

 

measured

 

at

 

415

 

nm.

 

The

amount

 

of

 

total

 

flavonoids

 

in

 

different

 

extracts

 

is

 

expressed

 

as

 

mil-

ligram

 

of

 

quercetin

 

equivalent

 

per

 

gram

 

of

 

dry

 

weight

 

(mg

 

QE/g

dw)

 

and

 

was

 

determined

 

from

 

a

 

standard

 

curve

 

of

 

quercetin

 

ranged

from

 

2

 

to

 

10

 

mg/L.

2.6.

 

Total

 

condensed

 

tannin

 

content

 

determination

To

 

evaluate

 

the

 

condensed

 

tannin

 

content

 

(CTC),

 

the

 

vanillin

method

 

was

 

used

 

(

Bekir

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013a

).

 

50

 

␮L

 

of

 

extract

 

solution

was

 

added

 

to

 

100

 

␮L

 

of

 

freshly

 

prepared

 

vanillin

 

solution

 

(1%

 

in

7

 

M

 

H

2

SO

4

)

 

and

 

then

 

incubation

 

in

 

darkness

 

during

 

15

 

min.

 

The

absorbance

 

was

 

measured

 

at

 

500

 

nm.

 

The

 

concentration

 

was

 

cal-

culated

 

as

 

milligram

 

catechin

 

equivalent

 

per

 

gram

 

of

 

dry

 

weight

(mg

 

CE/g

 

dw)

 

from

 

a

 

calibration

 

curve.

2.7.

 

Total

 

anthocyanin

 

content

 

determination

Total

 

anthocyanin

 

content

 

(TAC)

 

was

 

quantified

 

with

 

the

 

pH

 

dif-

ferential

 

absorbance

 

method

 

(

Bekir

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013a

).

 

The

 

absorbance

 

of

each

 

extract

 

was

 

measured

 

at

 

510

 

and

 

700

 

nm

 

in

 

two

 

buffers

 

at

 

pH

1.0

 

(hydrochloric

 

acid-potassium

 

chloride,

 

0.2

 

M)

 

and

 

4.5

 

(acetic

acid-sodium

 

acetate,

 

0.2

 

M)

 

after

 

15

 

min

 

incubation

 

in

 

darkness

of

 

equal

 

volume

 

of

 

extract

 

solution

 

and

 

buffer

 

(100

 

␮L).

 

The

 

real

absorbance

 

was

 

calculated

 

as

 

follows:

A

 

=



(

A

510

 

A

700

)

pH1

− (A

510

 

A

700

)

pH4

.5



The

 

TAC

 

was

 

measured

 

using

 

the

 

molar

 

extinction

 

coef-

ficient

 

of

 

the

 

cyanidin-3-glucoside

 

(C3G)

 

used

 

as

 

a

 

standard

(



 

=

 

26900

 

L

 

mol

−1

cm

−1

)

 

and

 

its

 

molecular

 

weight

 

and

 

the

 

well’s

diameter.

 

Results

 

were

 

expressed

 

as

 

mg

 

C3GE/g

 

dw.

2.8.

 

DPPH

radical

 

scavenging

 

assay

The

 

hydrogen

 

atom

 

donation

 

ability

 

of

 

chemical

 

compounds

in

 

FB

 

and

 

leaves

 

was

 

measured

 

on

 

the

 

basis

 

to

 

scavenge

 

the

 

sta-

ble

 

free

 

radical

 

1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl

 

(

Bekir

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013a

).

In

 

a

 

96-well

 

plates,

 

20

 

␮L

 

of

 

each

 

extract

 

solution,

 

at

 

a

 

con-

centration

 

ranging

 

from

 

1

 

to

 

80

 

mg/L,

 

were

 

added

 

to

 

180

 

␮L

of

 

a

 

freshly

 

prepared

 

80%

 

aqueous

 

methanolic

 

DPPH

solution

background image

1102

 

S.K.

 

El

 

Euch

 

et

 

al.

 

/

 

Industrial

 

Crops

 

and

 

Products

 

76

 

(2015)

 

1100–1105

(0.2

 

mM).

 

The

 

mixture

 

was

 

incubated

 

in

 

the

 

dark

 

for

 

25

 

min

 

and

the

 

absorbance

 

was

 

measured

 

against

 

a

 

blank

 

at

 

524

 

nm.

 

The

 

free

radical-scavenging

 

activity

 

was

 

calculated

 

as

 

percent

 

inhibition

using

 

the

 

following

 

formula:

PI (%)

=

A

blank

 

A

sample

A

blank

×

 

100

where

 

A

blank

is

 

the

 

absorbance

 

of

 

the

 

control

 

negative

 

reaction

without

 

extract.

 

A

sample

is

 

the

 

absorbance

 

of

 

the

 

test

 

sample.

 

Extract

concentration

 

providing

 

50%

 

inhibition

 

(IC

50

)

 

of

 

the

 

initial

 

DPPH

concentration

 

was

 

calculated

 

using

 

the

 

linear

 

relation

 

between

 

the

compound

 

concentration

 

and

 

the

 

probability

 

of

 

the

 

percentage

 

of

DPPH

inhibition.

 

The

 

ascorbic

 

acid

 

was

 

used

 

as

 

a

 

positive

 

control.

2.9.

 

ABTS

•+

radical

 

scavenging

 

assay

The

 

2,2



-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic

 

acid

(ABTS)

 

radical

 

cation

 

was

 

generated

 

by

 

the

 

oxidation

 

of

 

ABTS

with

 

potassium

 

persulfate,

 

and

 

its

 

reduction

 

in

 

the

 

presence

 

of

hydrogen-donating

 

antioxidants

 

is

 

measured

 

spectrophotomet-

rically

 

at

 

734

 

nm

 

(

Bekir

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013a

).

 

Briefly,

 

mix

 

7

 

mM

 

solution

of

 

ABTS

 

at

 

pH

 

7.4

 

(5

 

mM

 

NaH

2

PO

4

,

 

5

 

mM

 

Na

2

HPO

4

and

 

154

 

mM

NaCl)

 

with

 

2.45

 

mM

 

potassium

 

persulfate

 

(final

 

concentrations)

followed

 

by

 

storage

 

in

 

the

 

dark

 

at

 

4

C

 

for

 

16

 

h

 

before

 

use.

 

The

mixture

 

was

 

diluted

 

with

 

distilled

 

water

 

to

 

give

 

an

 

absorbance

ranging

 

between

 

0.70

 

and

 

0.9.

 

For

 

each

 

sample,

 

20

 

␮L

 

of

 

different

dilutions

 

(1–80

 

mg/L)

 

were

 

allowed

 

to

 

react

 

with

 

180

 

␮L

 

ABTS

•+

solution.

 

The

 

absorbance

 

was

 

measured

 

6

 

min

 

after

 

initial

 

mixing.

Free

 

radical

 

scavenging

 

ability

 

was

 

expressed

 

by

 

IC

50

(mg/L)

 

values

determined

 

as

 

described

 

previously

 

in

 

DPPH

assay.

 

Ascorbic

 

acid

was

 

used

 

as

 

a

 

standard.

2.10.

 

Ferric

 

reducing

 

antioxidant

 

power

 

assay

 

(FRAP)

The

 

reducing

 

power

 

of

 

the

 

extract

 

was

 

assessed

 

according

 

to

the

 

method

 

of

 

Yildirim

 

et

 

al.

 

(2001)

.

 

2

 

mL

 

of

 

various

 

concentra-

tions

 

(1–200

 

mg/L)

 

were

 

mixed

 

with

 

phosphate

 

buffer

 

(2.5

 

mL,

0.2

 

M)

 

and

 

2.5

 

mL

 

of

 

1%

 

potassium

 

ferricyanide

 

water

 

solution

K

3

[Fe(CN)

6

].

 

The

 

mixture

 

was

 

incubated

 

at

 

50

C

 

during

 

30

 

min.

2.5

 

mL

 

of

 

trichloroacetic

 

acid

 

(10%

 

aqueous

 

solution)

 

were

 

added

 

to

the

 

mixture

 

which

 

was

 

subsequently

 

centrifuged

 

at

 

3000

 

rpm

 

for

10

 

min.

 

The

 

supernatant

 

(2.5

 

mL)

 

was

 

mixed

 

with

 

an

 

equal

 

volume

of

 

distilled

 

water

 

and

 

0.5

 

mL

 

of

 

a

 

freshly

 

prepared

 

FeCl

3

solution

(0.1%).

 

The

 

absorbance

 

was

 

measured

 

after

 

10

 

min

 

incubation

 

in

darkness,

 

at

 

700

 

nm.

 

IC

50

value

 

(mg/L)

 

is

 

the

 

effective

 

concentra-

tion

 

the

 

absorbance

 

was

 

0.5

 

for

 

reducing

 

antioxidant

 

power

 

and

was

 

obtained

 

by

 

interpolation

 

from

 

linear

 

regression

 

analysis.

 

The

ascorbic

 

acid

 

was

 

used

 

as

 

a

 

positive

 

control.

2.11.

 

Anti-inflammatory

 

activity

The

 

anti-inflammatory

 

activity

 

was

 

assessed

 

using

 

the

 

spec-

trophotometric

 

measurement

 

of

 

a

 

conjugated

 

diene

 

the

 

result

 

of

linoleic

 

acid

 

oxidation

 

by

 

the

 

enzyme

 

5-LOX

 

(

Bekir

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013a

).

Briefly,

 

150

 

␮L

 

of

 

buffer

 

(pH

 

=

 

7.4)

 

(Na

2

HPO

4

,

 

2H

2

O;

 

KH

2

PO

4

;

 

NaCl)

were

 

mixed

 

with

 

20

 

␮L

 

of

 

extract

 

(50

 

mg/L

 

in

 

well),

 

60

 

␮L

 

of

 

linoleic

acid

 

and

 

20

 

␮L

 

of

 

5-LOX

 

enzyme

 

solution.

 

The

 

mixture

 

was

 

homog-

enized

 

and

 

incubated

 

for

 

10

 

min

 

at

 

25

C.

 

The

 

absorbance

 

was

determined

 

at

 

234

 

nm

 

against

 

a

 

blank.

 

Nordihydroguaiaretic

 

acid

(NDGA)

 

was

 

used

 

as

 

a

 

standard,

 

IC

50

value

 

is

 

the

 

concentration

 

of

the

 

extract

 

that

 

caused

 

50%

 

enzyme

 

inhibition.

2.12.

 

Anti-acetylcholinesterase

 

activity

 

evaluation

Ellman’s

 

method

 

(

Bekir

 

et

 

al.,

 

2013a

)

 

was

 

the

 

simple

 

tech-

nique

 

to

 

evaluate

 

the

 

activity

 

of

 

the

 

acetyl-cholinesterase

 

enzyme

(AChE).

 

Briefly,

 

50

 

␮L

 

of

 

buffer

 

A

 

(Na

2

HPO

4

,

 

12H

2

O

 

(0.1

 

M;

 

pH

 

=

 

8))

were

 

mixed

 

with

 

25

 

␮L

 

of

 

extract

 

solution

 

(50

 

mg/L),

 

125

 

␮L

 

of

5,5’-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoic

 

acid)

 

(DTNB)

 

solution

 

(3

 

mM,

 

pH

 

=

 

7)

prepared

 

in

 

Buffer

 

C

 

(Na

2

HPO

4

,

 

12H

2

O

 

(0.1

 

M,

 

pH

 

=

 

7))

 

and

 

25

 

␮L

of

 

the

 

enzyme

 

AChE

 

solution

 

(1.4

 

U/mL)

 

dissolved

 

in

 

buffer

 

B

(Na

2

HPO

4

,

 

12H

2

O

 

(0.02

 

M,

 

pH

 

=

 

7))

 

already

 

placed

 

in

 

an

 

ice

 

bath.

The

 

96-well

 

plate

 

was

 

placed

 

inside

 

the

 

plate

 

reader,

 

incubated

 

at

25

C

 

with

 

agitation

 

during

 

15

 

min.

 

The

 

plate

 

was

 

recuperated

 

to

add

 

25

 

␮L

 

of

 

acetylthiocholine

 

iodidesolution

 

(15

 

mM,

 

in

 

Buffer

 

A)

and

 

left

 

to

 

incubate

 

for

 

10

 

min.

 

The

 

absorbance

 

was

 

read

 

at

 

412

 

nm

against

 

a

 

blank.

 

Galanthamine

 

was

 

used

 

as

 

a

 

positive

 

control

 

and

the

 

IC

50

value

 

is

 

the

 

concentration

 

of

 

the

 

extract

 

causing

 

50%

 

of

AChE

 

inhibition.

2.13.

 

Xanthine

 

oxidase

 

inhibition

 

(XOD)

 

assay

XOD

 

inhibition

 

was

 

determined

 

by

 

measuring

 

at

 

295

 

nm,

 

the

formation

 

of

 

uric

 

acid

 

from

 

xanthine

 

(

Owen

 

and

 

Johns,

 

1999

).

 

In

96-well

 

plate,

 

60

 

␮L

 

of

 

buffer

 

(Na

2

HPO

4

,

 

70

 

mM,

 

pH

 

=

 

7.5)

 

were

mixed

 

with

 

50

 

␮L

 

of

 

extracts

 

(50

 

mg/L

 

in

 

well)

 

and

 

30

 

␮L

 

of

 

the

 

XOD

solution

 

(0.1

 

U/mL).

 

After

 

incubation

 

and

 

agitation

 

during

 

15

 

min

at

 

25

C,

 

60

 

␮L

 

of

 

xanthine

 

solution

 

(150

 

␮M)

 

were

 

added.

 

The

mixture

 

were

 

subsequently

 

homogenized

 

and

 

incubated

 

for

 

5

 

min.

The

 

absorbance

 

was

 

measured

 

against

 

a

 

blank

 

without

 

the

 

extract

test

 

and

 

the

 

inhibition

 

percentage

 

of

 

XOD

 

activity

 

was

 

calculated

according

 

to

 

the

 

formula:

PI (%)

=

A

blank

 

A

sample

A

blank

×

 

10

Allopurinol

 

was

 

used

 

as

 

a

 

reference

 

and

 

the

 

IC

50

value

 

is

 

the

extract

 

concentration

 

causing

 

50%

 

of

 

XOD

 

inhibition.

2.14.

 

Superoxide

 

dismutase

 

(SOD)

 

inhibition

 

test

SOD

 

activity

 

assay

 

was

 

performed

 

by

 

pyrogallol

 

autoxidation

method

 

(

Dieterich

 

et

 

al.,

 

2000

).

 

50

 

␮L

 

of

 

extracts

 

solutions

 

(50

 

mg/L

in

 

well)

 

were

 

mixed

 

with

 

120

 

␮L

 

of

 

SOD

 

solution

 

(0.2

 

mg/mL)

 

pre-

pared

 

in

 

buffer

 

(tris

 

(50

 

mM)/DTPA

 

(1

 

mM),

 

pH

 

=

 

7.4).

 

The

 

mixture

was

 

incubated

 

at

 

25

C

 

for

 

4

 

min

 

and

 

30

 

␮L

 

of

 

pyrogallol

 

solution

(30

 

mM)

 

were

 

added.

 

After

 

incubation

 

for

 

7

 

min

 

at

 

37

C,

 

the

 

first

absorbance

 

was

 

measured

 

at

 

325

 

nm.

 

The

 

following

 

photometries

were

 

recorded

 

every

 

minute

 

during

 

4

 

min.

 

The

 

inhibition

 

percent-

age

 

of

 

SOD

 

activity

 

was

 

calculated

 

according

 

to

 

the

 

formula

 

in

 

case

(

OD/min)

 

=

 

Abs

ti+1

 

Abs

ti

=

 

0.04

 

±

 

0.01for

 

the

 

control

 

and

 

blank

control:

PI (%)

=

A

sample

 

A

blank

 

sample

A

C

 

A

blank

 

sample

×

 

100

where

 

A

blanksample

is

 

the

 

absorbance

 

measured

 

without

 

the

 

extract;

A

C

is

 

the

 

absorbance

 

of

 

the

 

control

 

measured

 

without

 

the

 

enzyme

SOD.

If

 

(

OD

control

/min)

 

>

 

0.05,

 

the

 

extract

 

absorbs

 

and

 

(A

C

 

A

BC

)

must

 

be

 

subtracted

 

from

 

A

sample

.

If

 

(

OD

control

/min)

 

<

 

0.03,

 

the

 

extract

 

inhibits

 

the

 

pyrogallol

 

and

(A

C

 

A

BC

)

 

must

 

be

 

added

 

to

 

A

sample

.

 

A

BC

is

 

the

 

absorbance

 

measured

without

 

both

 

the

 

extract

 

and

 

the

 

enzyme.

2.15.

 

Cytotoxicity

 

evaluation

Cytotoxicity

 

of

 

extracts

 

against

 

human

 

breast

 

cancer

 

cells

(MCF-7)

 

and

 

ovarian

 

cancer

 

cells

 

(OVCAR)

 

was

 

estimated

by

 

the

 

3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium

 

bro-

mide

 

(MTT)

 

assay

 

of

 

Bekir

 

et

 

al.

 

(2013a)

.

 

100

 

␮L

 

of

 

cells

 

were

distributed

 

in

 

96-well

 

plates

 

at

 

a

 

concentration

 

of

 

10

4

cells/wells

and

 

incubated

 

at

 

37

C

 

during

 

24

 

h.

 

100

 

␮L

 

of

 

cells

 

in

 

exponential

growth

 

phase

 

were

 

incubated

 

at

 

37

C

 

for

 

48

 

h

 

with

 

the

 

presence

 

of

background image

S.K.

 

El

 

Euch

 

et

 

al.

 

/

 

Industrial

 

Crops

 

and

 

Products

 

76

 

(2015)

 

1100–1105

 

1103

Table

 

2

Chemical

 

composition

 

of

 

the

 

methanolic

 

Cistus

 

salviifolius

 

flower

 

buds

 

and

 

leaves

 

extracts.

Reference

 

Phenols

 

(GAE)

a

Flavonoids

 

(QE)

a

Tannins

 

(CE)

a

Anthocyanins

 

(C3GE)

a

FB

 

305.30

 

±

 

4.68

 

76.21

 

±

 

1.26

 

6.10

 

±

 

0.26

 

0.24

 

±

 

0.02

L

 

286.99

 

±

 

2.96

 

65.58

 

±

 

0.86

 

56.36

 

±

 

0.67

 

0.31

 

±

 

0.02

GAE:

 

Gallic

 

Acid

 

Equivalent.

 

QE:

 

Quercetin

 

Equivalent.

 

CE:

 

Catechin

 

Equivalent.

 

CGE:

 

Cyanidin

 

3-Glucoside

 

Equivalent.

 

Values

 

are

 

expressed

 

as

 

means

 

±

 

Standard

 

Deviation

(S.D),

 

n

 

=

 

3.

a

mg/g

 

dw

 

extract.

100

 

␮L

 

of

 

the

 

culture

 

medium

 

containing

 

extracts

 

at

 

a

 

concentra-

tion

 

of

 

50

 

mg/L.

 

The

 

medium

 

was

 

removed

 

and

 

cells

 

were

 

treated

with

 

MTT

 

solution

 

50

 

␮L,

 

1

 

mg/mL

 

in

 

phosphate

 

buffered

 

saline

(PBS)

 

and

 

incubated

 

at

 

37

C

 

for

 

40

 

min.

 

MTT

 

solution

 

was

 

then

discarded

 

and

 

DMSO

 

(50

 

␮L)

 

was

 

added

 

to

 

dissolve

 

insoluble

 

blue

crystals.

 

Optical

 

density

 

was

 

measured

 

at

 

605

 

nm.

 

Tamoxifen

 

was

used

 

as

 

positive

 

control.

All

 

data

 

were

 

expressed

 

as

 

means

 

±

 

standard

 

deviations

 

of

 

trip-

licate

 

measurements.

 

Standard

 

deviations

 

(S.D.)

 

did

 

not

 

exceed

 

5%

for

 

the

 

majority

 

of

 

the

 

obtained

 

values.

3.

 

Results

 

and

 

discussion

3.1.

 

Extraction

 

yields

Extraction

 

yields

 

of

 

C.

 

salviifolius

 

were

 

given

 

in

 

Table

 

1

.

 

The

FB

 

provided

 

higher

 

yield

 

(30.20%)

 

than

 

the

 

leaves

 

(21.75%).

 

Vari-

ation

 

in

 

the

 

yields

 

of

 

both

 

extracts

 

was

 

attributed

 

to

 

the

 

organ

factor.

 

These

 

results

 

were

 

much

 

better

 

than

 

that

 

reported

 

by

 

Qa’dan

et

 

al.

 

(2006)

 

when

 

they

 

found

 

12.50

 

and

 

1.275%

 

of

 

yields

 

obtained

from

 

successive

 

extraction

 

of

 

acetone-water

 

and

 

ethyl

 

acetate

 

of

 

C.

salviifolius

 

aerial

 

part,

 

respectively;

 

also,

 

more

 

important

 

than

 

that

determined

 

by

 

Tomas-Menor

 

et

 

al.

 

(2013)

,

 

obtained

 

with

 

aqueous

and

 

hydroalcoholic

 

macerations

 

and

 

which

 

were

 

ranging

 

from

 

6.20

to

 

8.50%

 

and

 

10.00

 

to

 

12.10%,

 

respectively.

 

We

 

did

 

not

 

find

 

any

 

data

concerning

 

C.

 

salviifolius

 

flower

 

buds

 

extract.

3.2.

 

Total

 

phenolics,

 

flavonoids,

 

tannins

 

and

 

anthocyanins

content

TPC,

 

TFC,

 

CTC

 

and

 

TAC

 

in

 

the

 

FB

 

and

 

leaves

 

extracts

 

of

 

C.

 

salvi-

ifolius

 

were

 

cited

 

in

 

Table

 

2

.

 

The

 

chemical

 

composition

 

of

 

leaves

 

and

FB

 

extracts

 

showed

 

that

 

this

 

species

 

is

 

very

 

rich

 

in

 

phenolic

 

com-

pounds.

 

FB

 

contained

 

higher

 

amounts

 

of

 

TPC

 

and

 

TFC

 

than

 

leaves

(305.30

 

±

 

4.68

 

against

 

286.99

 

±

 

2.96

 

mg

 

GAE/g

 

dw

 

and

 

76.21

 

±

 

1.26

against

 

65.58

 

±

 

0.86

 

g

 

QE/g,

 

respectively).

 

However

 

the

 

CTC

 

were

nine

 

times

 

more

 

abundant

 

in

 

leaves

 

than

 

FB

 

(56.36

 

±

 

0.67

 

against

6.10

 

±

 

0.26

 

mg

 

CE/g

 

dw).

 

TAC

 

were

 

weakly

 

represented

 

in

 

both

leaves

 

and

 

FB

 

extracts

 

compared

 

to

 

the

 

other

 

families

 

and

 

they

 

were

more

 

abundant

 

in

 

leaves

 

than

 

FB

 

(0.31

 

±

 

0.02

 

against

 

0.24

 

±

 

0.02

 

mg

C3GE/g

 

dw).

 

C.

 

salviifolius

 

possessed

 

a

 

considerable

 

concentration

of

 

phenolics

 

and

 

flavonoids

 

when

 

compared

 

to

 

results

 

found

 

in

the

 

literature.

 

In

 

fact,

 

TPC

 

obtained

 

in

 

FB

 

extracts

 

(305.30

 

±

 

4.68

 

mg

GAE/g

 

dw)

 

and

 

in

 

leaves

 

extract

 

(286.99

 

±

 

2.96

 

mg

 

GAE/g

 

dw)

 

were

higher

 

than

 

that

 

reported

 

by

 

Tomas-Menor

 

et

 

al.

 

(2013)

 

from

Spain

 

sample

 

(273.30

 

±

 

0.20

 

and

 

243.80

 

±

 

0.95

 

mg

 

GAE/g

 

ethano-

lic

 

and

 

aqueous

 

leaves

 

dw,

 

respectively).

 

Moreover,

 

TFC

 

in

 

the

both

 

extracts

 

were

 

three

 

to

 

five

 

times

 

more

 

important

 

than

that

 

determined

 

by

 

Tomas-Menor

 

et

 

al.

 

(2013)

 

(15.70

 

±

 

0.04

 

and

10.50

 

±

 

0.06

 

mg

 

QE/g

 

ethanolic

 

and

 

aqueous

 

leaves

 

dw,

 

respec-

tively).

 

In

 

addition,

 

in

 

comparison

 

with

 

other

 

Spanish

 

Cistus

 

species,

C.

 

salviifolius

 

TPC

 

and

 

TFC,

 

in

 

leaves

 

and

 

FB

 

extracts,

 

were

 

more

interesting

 

than

 

that

 

found

 

in

 

C.

 

ladanifer

 

leaves

 

(229.30

 

±

 

1.08

 

mg

GAE/g

 

dw

 

and

 

30.40

 

±

 

0.49

 

mg

 

QE/g

 

dw,

 

respectively)

 

and

 

obtained

with

 

aqueous

 

extraction.

 

We

 

note

 

also

 

higher

 

concentration

 

of

flavonoids

 

in

 

our

 

extracts

 

than

 

that

 

assessed

 

in

 

C.

 

populifolius

 

leaves

Table

 

3

Antioxidant

 

activity

 

assessed

 

by

 

means

 

DPPH

,

 

ABTS

•+

and

 

FRAP

 

assays.

Reference

 

IC

50

(mg/L)

DPPH

ABTS

•+

FRAP

FB

 

5.11

 

±

 

0.53

4.82

 

±

 

0.08

59.27

 

±

 

0.13

L

 

6.48

 

±

 

0.19

 

7.87

 

±

 

0.28

 

77.35

 

±

 

0.32

Vitamin

 

C

 

4.68

 

±

 

0.12

 

4.07

 

±

 

0.20

 

18.00

 

±

 

0.05

Values

 

are

 

expressed

 

as

 

means

 

±

 

S.D,

 

n

 

=

 

3.

aqueous

 

extract

 

(59.50

 

±

 

1.08

 

mg

 

QE/g

 

dw)

 

(

Barrajón-Catalán

 

et

 

al.,

2010

).

3.3.

 

Antioxidant

 

capacity

Leaves

 

and

 

FB

 

extracts

 

were

 

individually

 

assessed

 

for

 

antiox-

idant

 

activity

 

using

 

three

 

different

 

spectrophotometric

 

tests

 

and

were

 

compared

 

to

 

the

 

positive

 

control,

 

ascorbic

 

acid.

 

The

 

results

were

 

summarized

 

in

 

Table

 

3

.

 

Our

 

findings

 

revealed

 

that

 

both

extracts

 

have

 

very

 

notable

 

antioxidant

 

activity

 

which

 

was

 

com-

parable

 

to

 

the

 

positive

 

control

 

due

 

to

 

their

 

richness

 

of

 

TPC

and

 

TFC.

 

We

 

observed

 

also

 

that

 

FB

 

exhibited

 

more

 

potent

antioxidant

 

activity

 

than

 

the

 

leaves

 

justified

 

by

 

the

 

DPPH

,

ABTS

•+

and

 

FRAP

 

tests

 

(IC

50

=

 

5.11

±0.53

 

against

 

6.48

 

±

 

0.19

 

mg/L;

4.82

 

±

 

0.08

 

against

 

7.87

 

±

 

0.28

 

mg/L

 

and

 

59.27

 

±

 

0.13

 

against

77.35

 

±

 

0.32

 

mg/L,

 

respectively).

 

This

 

result

 

may

 

be

 

explained

 

by

 

its

higher

 

content

 

of

 

phenols

 

and

 

flavonoids

 

when

 

compared

 

to

 

leaves.

No

 

antioxidant

 

activity

 

of

 

C.

 

salviifolius

 

extract

 

has

 

been

 

previously

reported.

We

 

should

 

notice

 

that

 

the

 

antioxidant

 

activity

 

of

 

leaves

 

and

flower

 

buds

 

extracts,

 

as

 

complex

 

mixtures,

 

have

 

exerted

 

very

strong

 

antioxidant

 

activities

 

which

 

were

 

highly

 

comparable

 

to

 

the

pure

 

compound

 

vitamin

 

C.

 

These

 

results

 

prove

 

the

 

presence

 

in

extracts

 

interesting

 

and

 

more

 

potent

 

antioxidants

 

when

 

compared

to

 

vitamin

 

C.

3.4.

 

Anti-xanthine

 

oxidase

 

activity

From

 

the

 

Table

 

4

,

 

we

 

observed

 

that

 

both

 

extracts,

 

at

 

a

 

concen-

tration

 

of

 

50

 

mg/L,

 

possessed

 

notable

 

inhibition

 

potency

 

against

XOD.

 

The

 

leaves

 

extract

 

exhibited

 

more

 

powerful

 

activity

 

(IP

(%)

 

=

 

63.51

 

±

 

4.76)

 

than

 

FB

 

extract

 

(IP

 

(%)

 

=

 

54.73

 

±

 

2.09).

 

This

 

result

may

 

be

 

explained

 

by

 

the

 

presence

 

of

 

greatly

 

higher

 

CTC

 

in

leaves

 

than

 

FB

 

(56.36

 

±

 

0.67

 

against

 

6.10

 

±

 

0.26

 

mg

 

CE/g

 

dw),

also

 

more

 

important

 

concentration

 

of

 

anthocyanins

 

(0.31

 

±

 

0.02

against

 

0.24

 

±

 

0.02

 

mg

 

C3GE/g

 

dw).

 

Flavonoids

 

and

 

proantho-

cyanidins

 

are

 

reported

 

to

 

be

 

antioxidants

 

inhibitors

 

of

 

xanthine

oxidase

 

(

Gonzalez

 

et

 

al.,

 

1995

).

 

Moreover,

 

we

 

observed,

 

that

 

the

complex

 

mixture

 

of

 

leaves

 

extract

 

had

 

an

 

important

 

IC

50

value

(19.48

 

±

 

0.21)

 

which

 

was

 

near

 

to

 

that

 

of

 

the

 

pure

 

compound,

 

allop-

urinol

 

(IC

50

=

 

1.13

 

±

 

0.78

 

mg/L).

 

This

 

obtained

 

result

 

could

 

highlight

the

 

idea

 

of

 

pure

 

active

 

compounds

 

isolation

 

and

 

identification

 

as

 

a

possible

 

candidate.

No

 

investigations

 

have

 

been

 

conducted

 

before

 

on

 

C.

 

salviifolius

extract

 

inhibitory

 

activity

 

against

 

XOD.

 

The

 

inhibition

 

percent-

age

 

obtained

 

in

 

this

 

study

 

by

 

C.

 

salviifolius

 

leaves

 

extract

 

at

background image

1104

 

S.K.

 

El

 

Euch

 

et

 

al.

 

/

 

Industrial

 

Crops

 

and

 

Products

 

76

 

(2015)

 

1100–1105

Table

 

4

Anti-xanthine

 

oxidase,

 

anti-superoxide

 

dismutase,

 

anti-acetylcholinesterase

 

and

 

anti-inflammatory

 

activities

 

of

 

Cistus

 

salviifolius

 

extracts.

Samples

 

Anti-XOD

 

activity

 

Anti-AChE

 

activity

 

Anti-SOD

 

activity

 

Anti-5-LOX

 

activity

IP

 

(%)

a

IC

50

b

IP

 

(%)

a

IC

50

b

IP

 

(%)

a

IP

 

(%)

a

IC

50

b

FB

 

54.73

 

±

 

2.09

 

 

34.72

 

±

 

2.02

 

 

58.39

 

±

 

11.67

 

21.03

 

±

 

0.23

 

L

 

63.51

 

±

 

4.76

 

19.48

 

±

 

0.21

 

87.18

 

±

 

0.74

 

18.00

 

±

 

2.71

 

37.70

 

±

 

5.36

 

82.27

 

±

 

3.06

 

13.38

 

±

 

0.20

Allopurinol

 

94.50

 

±

 

2.22

1.13

 

±

 

0.78

 

 

 

 

Galanthamine

 

 

 

 

1.17

 

±

 

0.06

 

 

 

NDGA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.81

 

±

 

0.05

a

Inhibition

 

percentage

 

at

 

a

 

concentration

 

of

 

50

 

mg/L.

b

mg/L;

 

NDGA:

 

nordihydroguaiaretic

 

acid.

 

Values

 

are

 

expressed

 

as

 

means

 

±

 

S.D,

 

n

 

=

 

3.

a

 

concentration

 

of

 

50

 

mg/L

 

was

 

higher

 

than

 

those

 

obtained

 

by

Nile

 

and

 

Khobragade

 

(2011)

 

and

 

Sahgal

 

et

 

al.

 

(2009)

 

when

 

they

reported

 

62.42

 

±

 

1.8%

 

of

 

inhibition

 

percentage

 

at

 

a

 

concentration

of

 

50

 

mg/L

 

of

 

Tephrosia

 

purprea

 

Linn.

 

root

 

methanolic

 

extract

 

and

47.21

 

±

 

0.01%

 

at

 

higher

 

concentration

 

of

 

1000

 

mg/L

 

of

 

methanolic

Swietenia

 

mahagoni

 

seed

 

extract,

 

respectively.

3.5.

 

Anti-acetylcholinesterase

 

activity

Anti-AChE

 

activity

 

of

 

C.

 

salviifolius

 

leaves

 

and

 

FB

 

extracts

 

was

tested

 

(

Table

 

4

)

 

at

 

a

 

concentration

 

of

 

50

 

mg/L.

 

We

 

notice

 

the

absence

 

of

 

anti-AChE

 

activity

 

evaluation

 

for

 

this

 

plant

 

in

 

the

 

liter-

ature.

 

From

 

the

 

Table

 

4

,

 

we

 

observed

 

that

 

leaves

 

extract

 

exhibited

more

 

than

 

two

 

times

 

interesting

 

inhibitory

 

activity

 

towards

 

the

enzyme

 

AChE

 

(IP

 

(%)

 

=

 

87.18

 

±

 

0.74)

 

in

 

comparison

 

to

 

FB

 

extract

(34.72

 

±

 

0.02%).

 

This

 

result

 

may

 

be

 

explained

 

by

 

the

 

considerably

higher

 

amount

 

of

 

condensed

 

tannins

 

and

 

anthocyanins

 

in

 

leaves

extract

 

than

 

FB.

C.

 

salviifolius

 

leaves

 

extract

 

(at

 

a

 

concentration

 

of

 

50

 

mg/L)

exhibited

 

considerably

 

better

 

AChE

 

inhibitory

 

activity

(87.18

 

±

 

0.74%)

 

compared

 

to

 

a

 

variety

 

of

 

reported

 

plants

(

Mukherjee

 

et

 

al.,

 

2007

)

 

(e.g.:

 

65.16

 

±

 

8.13%

 

obtained

 

from

methanolic

 

stems

 

extracts

 

of

 

Piper

 

interruptum;

 

58.02

 

±

 

3.83%

 

got

from

 

methanolic

 

seed

 

extracts

 

of

 

Piper

 

nigrum

 

at

 

a

 

concentration

of

 

100

 

mg/L

 

and

 

68.2

 

±

 

15.6

 

obtained

 

from

 

95%

 

ethanolic

 

extracts

of

 

whole

 

Salvia

 

officinalis

 

at

 

a

 

concentration

 

of

 

2500

 

mg/L).

 

Due

 

to

its

 

interesting

 

IC

50

values

 

(IC

50

=

 

18

 

±

 

2.71

 

mg/L),

 

bioactive

 

pure

compounds

 

existing

 

in

 

C.

 

salviifolius

 

leaves

 

extracts

 

could

 

be

 

good

candidates

 

to

 

replace

 

galantamine

 

while

 

it

 

has

 

been

 

reported

 

to

have

 

adverse

 

effects

 

including

 

gastrointestinal

 

disturbances

 

and

problems

 

associated

 

with

 

bioavailability

 

(

Melzer,

 

1998;

 

Schulz,

2003

).

3.6.

 

Anti-superoxide

 

dismutase

 

activity

SOD,

 

a

 

natural

 

metallo-enzyme

 

present

 

in

 

various

 

plant

 

extracts,

is

 

produced

 

endogenously

 

in

 

all

 

aerobic

 

cells.

 

It

 

catalyses

 

the

 

dis-

mutase

 

of

 

the

 

superoxide

 

anion

 

(O

2

2

)

 

into

 

oxygen

 

and

 

hydrogen

peroxide.

 

This

 

antioxidant

 

enzyme

 

is

 

unfortunately

 

involved

 

in

chemo-resistant

 

ovarian

 

cancer

 

cells

 

processes.

 

Table

 

4

 

showed

that,

 

at

 

a

 

concentration

 

of

 

50

 

mg/L,

 

both

 

extracts

 

exhibited

 

good

anti-SOD

 

activity.

 

The

 

best

 

activity

 

was

 

observed

 

in

 

flower

 

buds

extract

 

(IP

 

(%)

 

=

 

58.39

 

±

 

11.67)

 

due

 

to

 

its

 

higher

 

content

 

of

 

phenols

and

 

flavonoids.

To

 

our

 

knowledge,

 

no

 

previously

 

study

 

on

 

the

 

anti-SOD

 

activ-

ity

 

of

 

any

 

plant

 

extract

 

has

 

been

 

reported

 

and

 

until

 

now,

 

there

 

is

no

 

known

 

inhibitor

 

used

 

for

 

this

 

enzyme.

 

So

 

obtained

 

values

 

are

encouraging

 

enough

 

to

 

prompt

 

us

 

to

 

try

 

to

 

identify

 

the

 

molecules

responsible

 

for

 

this

 

activity.

Table

 

5

Cytotoxic

 

activities

 

of

 

methanolic

 

extracts

 

assessed

 

by

 

means

 

OVCAR

 

and

 

MCF-7

tests.

Reference

 

Cytotoxic

 

activities

OVCAR

a

MCF-7

a

FB

 

36.85

 

±

 

5.66

 

35.16

 

±

 

4.67

L

 

NA

 

NA

Tamoxifen

 

(0.2

 

mg/L)

 

61.76

 

±

 

4.21

 

47.17

 

±

 

4.31

NA:

 

not

 

active.

 

Values

 

are

 

expressed

 

as

 

average

 

±

 

S.D,

 

n

 

=

 

3.

a

Inhibition

 

percentage

 

at

 

a

 

concentration

 

of

 

50

 

mg/L.

3.7.

 

Anti-inflammatory

 

activity

The

 

5-LOX

 

inhibition

 

by

 

leaves

 

and

 

FB

 

extracts

 

of

 

C.

 

salviifolius

was

 

reported

 

for

 

the

 

first

 

time

 

in

 

the

 

literature

 

in

 

this

 

study.

 

Leaves

extract

 

exhibited

 

four

 

times

 

stronger

 

anti-inflammatory

 

activity

(IP

 

=

 

82.27

 

±

 

3.06%)

 

than

 

FB

 

extracts

 

(IP

 

=

 

21.03

 

±

 

0.23%).

 

This

 

result

might

 

be

 

related

 

to

 

its

 

considerable

 

richness

 

in

 

condensed

 

tannins

and

 

anthocyanins

 

in

 

comparison

 

with

 

leaves.

NDGA,

 

known

 

as

 

a

 

potent

 

antioxidant

 

was

 

used

 

as

 

a

 

standard.

This

 

pure

 

compound

 

has

 

seven

 

times

 

stronger

 

anti-inflammatory

activity

 

(IC

50

=

 

1.81

 

±

 

0.05

 

mg/L)

 

when

 

compared

 

to

 

the

 

complex

mixture

 

of

 

leaves

 

extract

 

(IC

50

=

 

13.38

 

±

 

0.20

 

mg/L).

 

So,

 

we

 

should

notice

 

that

 

this

 

extract

 

fractionation

 

could

 

take

 

out

 

pure

 

active

compounds

 

against

 

5-LOX

 

enzyme,

 

more

 

active

 

than

 

NDGA.

 

More-

over,

 

we

 

deduce

 

that

 

this

 

result

 

is

 

much

 

better

 

than

 

some

 

varieties

of

 

Punica

 

granatum

 

reported

 

by

 

Bekir

 

et

 

al.

 

(2013b)

 

when

 

they

obtained

 

IC

50

=

 

21.80

 

±

 

0.50

 

and

 

14.30

 

±

 

1.50

 

mg/L

 

for

 

the

 

Garsi

 

and

Gabsi

 

varieties,

 

respectively.

We

 

should

 

notice

 

that

 

the

 

most

 

prominent

 

anti-inflammatory,

anti-acetylcholinesterase

 

and

 

anti-XOD

 

activities

 

were

 

found

 

in

the

 

same

 

most

 

active

 

extract:

 

leaves

 

extract.

 

This

 

result

 

may

 

be

explained

 

by

 

the

 

possible

 

presence

 

of

 

a

 

correlation

 

between

 

these

activities

 

such

 

as

 

a

 

radical

 

mechanism

 

link.

3.8.

 

Cytotoxic

 

activity

Cytotoxic

 

activity

 

evaluation

 

of

 

leaves

 

and

 

FB

 

extracts,

 

at

 

a

 

con-

centration

 

of

 

50

 

mg/L,

 

against

 

the

 

cancer

 

cell

 

lines,

 

OVCAR

 

and

MCF-7,

 

using

 

the

 

MTT

 

assay,

 

was

 

showed

 

for

 

the

 

first

 

time

 

in

 

the

 

lit-

erature

 

for

 

this

 

plant

 

(

Table

 

5

).

 

The

 

anti-cancer

 

activity

 

of

 

FB

 

extract

was

 

moderate

 

(IP

 

=

 

36.85

 

±

 

5.66

 

and

 

35.16

 

±

 

4.67%

 

towards

 

OVCAR

and

 

MCF-7

 

respectively),

 

but

 

more

 

interesting

 

than

 

leaves

 

extract

found

 

to

 

be

 

inactive

 

against

 

the

 

both

 

cells

 

lines.

 

This

 

result

 

can

be

 

explained

 

by

 

the

 

presence

 

of

 

higher

 

concentrations

 

of

 

phenols

and

 

flavonoids

 

in

 

FB

 

than

 

leaves.

 

The

 

absence

 

of

 

cytotoxic

 

property

could

 

highlight

 

the

 

idea

 

of

 

C.

 

salviifolius

 

leaves

 

extract

 

use

 

in

 

food

preservation,

 

essentially

 

to

 

fight

 

or

 

delay

 

the

 

oxidation

 

process

 

as

it

 

exhibited

 

powerful

 

antioxidant

 

activity.

background image

S.K.

 

El

 

Euch

 

et

 

al.

 

/

 

Industrial

 

Crops

 

and

 

Products

 

76

 

(2015)

 

1100–1105

 

1105

4.

 

Conclusions

Our

 

work

 

highlighted

 

the

 

significant

 

difference

 

in

 

chemical

composition

 

between

 

the

 

two

 

organs,

 

leaves

 

and

 

flower

 

buds,

 

and

its

 

significant

 

influence

 

on

 

the

 

biological

 

activities.

 

The

 

concentra-

tions

 

of

 

phenols

 

and

 

flavonoids

 

were

 

determined

 

to

 

be

 

highest

 

in

flower

 

buds,

 

however

 

the

 

tannins

 

and

 

the

 

anthocyanins

 

were

 

much

more

 

abundant

 

in

 

leaves.

 

Both

 

extracts

 

are

 

endowed

 

with

 

very

potent

 

antioxidant

 

activity,

 

especially

 

FB

 

extract,

 

proved

 

by

 

three

different

 

spectrophotometric

 

tests.

 

These

 

findings

 

lead

 

us

 

to

 

con-

clude

 

that

 

C.

 

salviifolius

 

extracts

 

could

 

be

 

considered

 

as

 

potential

alternatives

 

for

 

synthetic

 

antioxidants

 

used

 

in

 

the

 

food

 

indus-

try.

 

Furthermore,

 

SOD

 

enzyme

 

was

 

more

 

sensible

 

to

 

FB

 

extract

compounds.

 

However,

 

C.

 

salviifolius

 

leaves

 

extract

 

exerted

 

more

interesting

 

inhibitory

 

activities

 

towards

 

XOD,

 

AChE

 

and

 

5-LOX

enzymes.

 

Obtained

 

results

 

showed

 

that

 

condensed

 

tannins

 

and

anthocyanins

 

seem

 

to

 

have

 

a

 

major

 

effect

 

on

 

those

 

enzymes

 

inhibi-

tion.

 

Further

 

work

 

is

 

in

 

progress

 

to

 

identify

 

any

 

specific

 

molecules

which

 

may

 

be

 

responsible

 

for

 

the

 

observed

 

biological

 

activities

 

and

these

 

results

 

open

 

so

 

a

 

new

 

horizon

 

about

 

C.

 

salviifolius

 

possible

utilizations

 

in

 

several

 

fields

 

such

 

as

 

food

 

industries,

 

medicine

 

and

pharmaceutical.

Acknowledgements

We

 

gratefully

 

acknowledge

 

the

 

Tunisian

 

Ministry

 

of

 

High

 

Edu-

cation

 

for

 

supporting

 

this

 

work

 

and

 

Dr.

 

Nadia

 

Ben

 

Brahim

 

for

 

plant

material

 

authentication.

References

Al-Khalil,

 

S.,

 

1995.

 

A

 

survey

 

of

 

plants

 

used

 

in

 

jordanian

 

traditional

 

medicine.

 

Int.

 

J.

Pharmacogn.

 

33,

 

317–323.

Barrajón-Catalán,

 

E.,

 

Fernández-Arroyo,

 

S.,

 

Saura,

 

D.,

 

Guillén,

 

E.,

Fernández-Gutiérrez,

 

A.,

 

Segura-Carretero,

 

A.,

 

Micol,

 

V.,

 

2010.

 

Cistaceae

aqueous

 

extracts

 

containing

 

ellagitannins

 

show

 

antioxidant

 

and

 

antimicrobial

capacity,

 

and

 

cytotoxic

 

activity

 

against

 

human

 

cancer

 

cells.

 

J.

 

Food

 

Chem.

Toxicol.

 

48,

 

2273–2282.

Batelli,

 

M.G.,

 

Abbondanza,

 

A.,

 

Musiani,

 

S.,

 

Buonamici,

 

L.,

 

Strocchi,

 

P.,

 

Tazzari,

 

P.L.,

Gramantieri,

 

L.,

 

Stirpe,

 

F.,

 

1999.

 

Determination

 

of

 

xanthine

 

oxidase

 

in

 

human

serum

 

by

 

a

 

competitive

 

enzyme-linked

 

immune

 

sorbent

 

assay

 

(ELISA).

 

Clin.

Chim.

 

Acta

 

281,

 

147–158.

Bayoub,

 

K.,

 

Baibai,

 

T.,

 

Mountassif,

 

D.,

 

Retmane,

 

A.,

 

Soukri,

 

A.,

 

2010.

 

Antibacterial

activities

 

of

 

the

 

crude

 

ethanol

 

extracts

 

of

 

medicinal

 

plants

 

against

 

Listeria

monocytogenes

 

and

 

some

 

other

 

pathogenic

 

strains.

 

Afr.

 

J.

 

Biotechnol.

 

9,

4251–4258.

Bekir,

 

J.,

 

Mars,

 

M.,

 

Souchard,

 

J.P.,

 

Bouajila,

 

J.,

 

2013a.

 

Assessment

 

of

 

antioxidant,

anti-inflammatory,

 

anti-cholinesterase

 

and

 

cytotoxic

 

activities

 

of

 

pomegranate

(Punica

 

granatum)

 

leaves.

 

Food.

 

Chem.

 

Toxicol.

 

55,

 

470–475.

Bekir,

 

J.,

 

Mars,

 

M.,

 

Vicendo,

 

P.,

 

Fterrich,

 

A.,

 

Bouajila,

 

J.,

 

2013b.

 

Chemical

composition

 

and

 

antioxidant,

 

anti-inflammatory,

 

and

 

anti-proliferation

activities

 

of

 

pomegranate

 

(Punica

 

granatum)

 

flowers.

 

J.

 

Med.

 

Food

 

16,

 

544–550.

Ben

 

Jemia,

 

M.,

 

Kchouk,

 

M.E.,

 

Senatore,

 

F.,

 

Autore,

 

G.,

 

Marzocco,

 

S.,

 

De

 

Feo,

 

V.,

 

Bruno,

M.,

 

2013.

 

Antipro

 

life

 

rative

 

activity

 

of

 

hexane

 

extract

 

from

 

Tunisian

Cistuslibanotis,

 

Cistus

 

Monspeliensis

 

and

 

Cistusvillosus.

 

Chem.

 

Cent.

 

J.

 

47,

 

1–7.

Demetzos,

 

C.,

 

Dimas,

 

K.,

 

Hatziantoniou,

 

S.,

 

Anastasaki,

 

T.,

 

Angelopoulou,

 

D.,

 

2001.

Cytotoxic

 

and

 

anti-inflammatory

 

activity

 

of

 

labdane

 

and

 

cis-clerodane

 

type

diterpenes.

 

Planta

 

Med.

 

67,

 

614–618.

Demetzos,

 

C.,

 

Stahl,

 

B.,

 

Anastassaki,

 

T.,

 

Gazouli,

 

M.,

 

Tzouvelekis,

 

L.S.,

 

Rallis,

 

M.,

1999.

 

Chemical

 

analysis

 

and

 

antimicrobial

 

activity

 

of

 

the

 

resins

 

Ladano,

 

of

 

its

essential

 

oil

 

and

 

of

 

the

 

isolated

 

compounds.

 

Planta

 

Med.

 

65,

 

76–78.

Dieterich,

 

S.,

 

Bieligk,

 

U.,

 

Beulich,

 

K.,

 

Hasenfuss,

 

G.,

 

Prestle,

 

J.,

 

2000.

 

Gene

 

expression

of

 

antioxidative

 

enzymes

 

in

 

the

 

human

 

heart:

 

increased

 

expression

 

of

 

catalase

in

 

the

 

end-stage

 

failing

 

heart.

 

Circulation

 

101,

 

33–39.

Dimas,

 

K.,

 

Demetzos,

 

C.,

 

Angelopoulou,

 

D.,

 

Kolokouris,

 

A.,

 

Mavromoustakos,

 

T.,

2000.

 

Biological

 

activity

 

of

 

myricetin

 

and

 

its

 

derivatives

 

against

 

human

leukemic

 

cell

 

lines

 

in

 

vitro.

 

Pharmacol.

 

Res.

 

42,

 

475–478.

El

 

Euch,

 

S.K.,

 

Ciesla,

 

L.,

 

Bouzouita,

 

N.,

 

2014.

 

Free

 

radical

 

scavenging

 

fingerprints

 

of

selected

 

aromatic

 

and

 

medicinal

 

Tunesian

 

plants

 

assessed

 

by

 

means

 

of

TLC-DPPH.

 

Test

 

and

 

imaging

 

processing.

 

J.

 

AOAC

 

Int.

 

97

 

(5),

 

1291–1298.

Gonzalez,

 

A.G.,

 

Bazzocchi,

 

I.L.,

 

Moujir,

 

L.,

 

Ravelo,

 

A.G.,

 

Correa,

 

M.D.,

 

Gupta,

 

M.P.,

1995.

 

Xanthine

 

oxidase

 

inhibitory

 

activity

 

of

 

some

 

Panamian

 

plants

 

from

Celastraceae

 

and

 

Lamiaceae.

 

J.

 

Ethnopharmacol.

 

46,

 

25–29.

Haouat,

 

A.C.,

 

Sqalli,

 

H.,

 

Farah,

 

A.,

 

Haggoud,

 

A.,

 

Iraqui,

 

M.,

 

2013.

Activitéantimycobactérienne

 

des

 

extraits

 

de

 

deux

 

espèces

 

marocaines

 

du

genre

 

Cistus.

 

Phytotherapie

 

11,

 

365–372.

Kühn,

 

C.,

 

Arapogianni,

 

N.E.,

 

Halabalaki,

 

M.,

 

Hempel,

 

J.,

 

Hunger,

 

N.,

 

Wober,

 

J.,

Skaltsounis,

 

A.C.,

 

Vollmer,

 

G.,

 

2011.

 

Constituents

 

from

 

Cistus

 

salvifolius

(Cistaceae)

 

activate

 

peroxisome

 

proliferator-activated

 

receptor-y

 

but

 

not

 

-

and

 

stimulate

 

glucose

 

uptake

 

by

 

adipocytes.

 

Planta

 

Med.

 

77

 

(4),

 

346–353.

Loizzo,

 

M.R.,

 

Ben

 

Jamia,

 

M.,

 

Senatore,

 

F.,

 

Bruno,

 

M.,

 

Menichni,

 

F.,

 

Tundis,

 

R.,

 

2013.

Chemistry

 

and

 

functional

 

properties

 

in

 

prevention

 

of

 

neurodegenerative

disorders

 

of

 

five

 

Cistus

 

species

 

essential

 

oils.

 

Food

 

Chem.

 

Toxicol.

 

59,

 

586–594.

Melzer,

 

D.,

 

1998.

 

New

 

drug

 

treatment

 

for

 

Alzheimer’s

 

diseases:

 

lessons

 

for

healthcare

 

policy.

 

BMJ

 

316,

 

762–764.

Mukherjee,

 

P.K.,

 

Kumar,

 

V.,

 

Mal,

 

M.,

 

Houghton,

 

P.J.,

 

2007.

 

Acetylcholinesterase

inhibitors

 

from

 

plants.

 

Phytomedicine

 

14,

 

289–300.

Nile,

 

S.H.,

 

Khobragade,

 

C.N.,

 

2011.

 

Phytochemical

 

analysis,

 

antioxidant

 

and

xanthine

 

oxidase

 

inhibitory

 

activity

 

of

 

Tephrosiapurpurea

 

Linn.

 

root

 

extract.

Indian

 

J.

 

Nat.

 

Prod.

 

Res.

 

2,

 

52–58.

Owen,

 

P.L.,

 

Johns,

 

T.,

 

1999.

 

Xanthine

 

oxidase

 

inhibitory

 

activity

 

of

 

northeastern

North

 

American

 

plant

 

remedies

 

used

 

for

 

gout.

 

J.

 

Ethnopharmacol.

 

64,

 

149–160.

Qa’dan,

 

F.,

 

Petereit,

 

F.,

 

Mansoor,

 

K.,

 

Nahrstedt,

 

A.,

 

2006.

 

Antioxidant

oligomericproanthocyanidins

 

from

 

Cistus

 

salviifolius.

 

Nat.

 

Prod.

 

Res.

 

20,

1216–1224.

Quer,

 

P.F.,

 

2005.

 

Plantas

 

medicinales.

 

El

 

Dioscórides

 

renovado.

 

Ediciones

 

Península.

Barcelona,

 

1999.

 

Obra

 

clásica,

 

lista

 

extensa

 

de

 

plantas

 

medicinales

 

(incluidos

hongos)

 

con

 

descripciones

 

de

 

las

 

plantas

 

y

 

sus

 

usos.

Sahgal,

 

G.,

 

Ramanathan,

 

S.,

 

Sasidharan,

 

S.,

 

Mordi,

 

M.N.,

 

Ismail,

 

S.,

 

Mansor,

 

S.M.,

2009.

 

In

 

vitroantioxidant

 

and

 

xanthine

 

oxidase

 

inhibitory

 

activities

 

of

methanolic

 

Swietenia

 

mahagoni

 

seed

 

extracts.

 

Molecules

 

14,

 

4476–4485.

Saracini,

 

E.,

 

Tattini,

 

M.,

 

Traversi,

 

M.L.,

 

Vincieri,

 

F.F.,

 

Pinelli,

 

P.,

 

2005.

 

Simultaneous

LC-DAD

 

and

 

LC-MS

 

determination

 

of

 

ellagitannins,

 

flavonoid

 

glycosides,

 

and

acyl-glycosyl

 

flavonoids

 

in

 

Cistus

 

salviifolius

 

L.

 

leaves.

 

Chromatographia

 

62,

245–249.

Schulz,

 

V.,

 

2003.

 

Ginkgo

 

extract

 

or

 

cholinesterase

 

inhibitors

 

in

 

patients

 

with

dementia:

 

what

 

clinical

 

trial

 

and

 

guidelines

 

fail

 

to

 

consider.

 

Phytomedicine

 

10,

74–79.

Tomas-Menor,

 

L.,

 

Morales-Soto,

 

A.,

 

Barrajon-Catalan,

 

E.,

 

Roldan-Segura,

 

C.,

Segura-Carretero,

 

A.,

 

Micol,

 

V.,

 

2013.

 

Correlation

 

between

 

the

 

antibacterial

activity

 

and

 

the

 

composition

 

of

 

extracts

 

derived

 

from

 

various

 

Spanish

 

Cistus

species.

 

J.

 

Food.

 

Chem.

 

Toxicol.

 

55,

 

313–322.

Yildirim,

 

A.,

 

Mavi,

 

A.,

 

Kara,

 

A.A.,

 

2001.

 

Determination

 

of

 

antioxidant

 

and

antimicrobial

 

activities

 

of

 

Rumexcrispus

 

L.

 

extracts.

 

J.

 

Agri.

 

Food.

 

Chem.

 

49,

4083–4089.

Yesilada,

 

E.,

 

Gürbüz,

 

I.,

 

Shibata,

 

H.,

 

1999.

 

Screening

 

of

 

Turkish

 

anti-ulcerogenic

folkremedies

 

for

 

anti-helicobacter

 

pylori

 

activity.

 

J.

 

Ethnopharmacol.

 

66,

289–293.


Document Outline