|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Podaż |
59 |
Popyt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tabela cij |
|
Odbiorcy |
Zamość |
Slupsk |
Suwałki |
Opole |
Magazyn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zakł. produkcyjne |
|
14 |
11 |
12 |
18 |
4 |
|
Metoda minimalnego kosztu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metoda kąta północno zachodniego |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Przemyśl |
22 |
2 |
9 |
7 |
4 |
3 |
|
Tabela cij |
|
Odbiorcy |
Zamość |
Slupsk |
Suwałki |
Opole |
Magazyn |
Tabela cij |
|
Odbiorcy |
Zamość |
Slupsk |
Suwałki |
Opole |
Magazyn |
|
Olsztyn |
20 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
|
|
Zakł. produkcyjne |
|
14 |
11 |
12 |
18 |
4 |
|
Zakł. produkcyjne |
|
14 |
11 |
12 |
18 |
4 |
|
Koszalin |
17 |
8 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
|
|
Przemyśl |
22 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
|
Przemyśl |
22 |
14 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Olsztyn |
20 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
8 |
0 |
|
Olsztyn |
20 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
5 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Koszalin |
17 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
|
Koszalin |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
4 |
Tabela cij |
|
Odbiorcy |
Zamość |
Slupsk |
Suwałki |
Opole |
Magazyn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zakł. produkcyjne |
|
14 |
11 |
12 |
18 |
4 |
|
|
Koszt transportu |
169 |
Koszt transportu |
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Przemyśl |
22 |
14 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Olsztyn |
20 |
0 |
8 |
9 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Koszalin |
17 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
|
Metoda potencjałów |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
4 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Koszt transportu |
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
6 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
5 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Koszt transportu do Opola |
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vj |
2 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Macierz kosztów zredukowanych |
|
|
|
cijB = cij - ui - vj |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
9 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poprawiony plan przewozów |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tabela cij |
|
Odbiorcy |
Zamość |
Slupsk |
Suwałki |
Opole |
Magazyn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zakł. produkcyjne |
|
14 |
11 |
12 |
18 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Przemyśl |
22 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Olsztyn |
20 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Koszalin |
17 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Koszt transportu |
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metoda potencjałów |
|
|
cij = ui + vj |
|
|
|
|
ui |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
5 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vj |
2 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Macierz kosztów zredukowanych |
|
|
|
cijB = cij - ui - vj |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
9 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W macierzy kosztów zredukowanych nie ma liczb ujemnych. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poprawiony plan przewozów jest rozwiązaniem optymalnym. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|