Ch15 10

Ch. 15-10 Build a Model Solution





3/11/2001










Chapter 15. Solution to Ch 15-10 Build a Model




















Bradford Services Inc. (BSI) is considering a project that has a cost of $10 million and an expected life of 3 years.








There is a 30 percent probability of good conditions, in which case the project will provide a cash flow of $9 million at








the end of each year for 3 years. There is a 40 percent probability of medium conditions, in which case the annual cash








flows will be $4 million, and there is a 30 percent probability of bad conditions and a cash flow of -$1 million per year.








BSI uses a 12 percent cost of capital to evaluate projects like this.


















a. Find the project's expected cash flows and NPV.


















WACC= 12%

















Condition Probability CF CF x Prob.





Good 30% $9 $2.70





Medium 40% $4 $1.60





Bad 30% -$1 -$0.30







Expected CF= $4.00















Time line of Expected CF









0 1 2 3





-$10 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00














NPV= -$0.39



























Without any real options, reject the project. It has a negative NPV and is quite risky.




























b. Now suppose the BSI can abandon the project at the end of the first year by selling it for $6 million. BSI will still








receive the Year 1 cash flows, but will receive no cash flows in subsequent years. Assume the salvage








value is risky and should be discounted at the WACC.



















WACC= 12%
Salvage Value = $6




Risk-free rate = 6%
















Decision Tree Analysis


















Cost
Future Cash Flows
NPV this Probability

0 Probability 1 2 3
Scenario x NPV













$9 $9 $9
$11.62 $3.48










-$10 40% $4 $4 $4
-$0.39 -$0.16


30%









Sum of -$1 operating CF and salvage value of $6. $5 $0 $0
-$5.54 -$1.66







Expected NPV of Future CFs = $1.67





















When abandonment is factored in, the very large negative NPV under bad conditions is reduced, and the








expected NPV becomes positive. Note that even though the NPV of medium is still negative, it is higher than it would be if the project was abandoned at year 1 if conditions are medium.













c. Now assume that the project cannot be shut down. However, expertise gained by taking it on will lead to an opportunity








at the end of Year 3 to undertake a venture that would have the same cost as the original project, and the new project's








cash flows would follow whichever branch resulted for the original project. In other words, there would be a second








$10 million cost at the end of Year 3, and then cash flows of either $9 million, $4 million, or -$1million for the








following 3 years. Use decision tree analysis to estimate the value of the project, including the opportunity to








implement the new project in Year 3. Assume the $10 million cost at Year 3 is known with certainty and should








be discounted at the risk-free rate of 6 percent. Hint: do one decision tree for the operating cash flows and one








for the cost of the project, then sum their NPVs.




























WACC= 12%

















Decision Tree Analysis








Cost
Future Operating Cash Flows (Discount at WACC) Discount at WACC since these are risky cash flows. Include original cost, but not the cost of implementing additional project at Year 3. NPV this Prob.
0 Probability 1 2 3 4 5 6 Scenario x NPV












$9 $9 $9 $9 $9 $9 $27.00 $8.10









-$10 40% $4 $4 $4 $0 $0 $0 -$0.39 -$0.16

30%









-$1 -$1 -$1 $0 $0 $0 -$12.40 -$3.72








Expected NPV of Future Operating CFs = $4.22






















Future Cost of Implementing Additional Project (Discount at Risk-free rate) Discount at risk-free rate since cost is known with certainty. Don't include orginal cost, since it is already included in the decision tree above. NPV this Prob.
0 Probability 1 2 3 4 5 6 Scenario x PV












$0 $0 -$10 $0 $0 $0 -$7.12 -$2.14










40% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00

30%









$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00








Expected NPV of Future Operating CFs = -$2.14


















Total NPV (NPV of Future Operating CF plus NPV of Future Year 3 cost of implenting additional project) = $2.09




















Here the project has a positive expected NPV, so by this criterion it can be accepted.




























d. Now suppose the original (no abandonment and no additional growth) project could be delayed a year. All the cash








flows would remain unchanged, but information obtained during that year would tell the company exactly which








set of demand conditions existed. Use decision tree analysis to estimate the value of the project if it is delayed by 1








year. Hint: Discount the $10 million cost at the risk-free rate since it is known with certainty. Show two








time lines, one for operating cash flows and one for the cost, then sum their NPVs.



















WACC= 12%







Risk-free rate = 6%
















Decision Tree Analysis

Future Operating Cash Flows
(Discount at WACC)






Cost NPV this Probability

0 Probability 1 2 3 4 Scenario x NPV














$9 $9 $9 $21.62 $6.48











40%
$0 $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00


30%










$0 $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00







Expected PV of Future CFs = $6.48











Decision Tree Analysis

Future Cost of Implementation
(Discount at Risk-Free Rate)






Cost Discount at risk-free rate since the cost is known with certainty. NPV this Probability

0 Probability 1 2 3 4 Scenario x NPV













-$10 $0 $0 $0 -$9.43 -$2.83











40%
$0 $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00


30%










$0 $0 $0 $0.00 $0.00







Expected PV of Future CFs = -$2.83











Total NPV (NPV of Future Operating CF plus
NPV of Future Year 1 cost of implenting additional project) =



$3.65





















Since the NPV from waiting is positive and the NPV from immediate implementation is negative, it makes sense to delay the decision for a year.











e. Go back to part c. Instead of using decision tree analysis, use the Black-Scholes model to estimate the value of the








growth option. The risk-free rate is 6 percent, and the variance of the project's rate of return is 22 percent.




















Risk-free rate= 6%







Variance of project's rate of return= 22%


























Financial Option

Real Option



kRF = Risk-free interest rate

= Risk-free interest rate



t = Time until the option expires

= Time until the option expires



X = Exercise price

= Cost to implement the project



P = Current price of the underlying stock

= Current value of the additional project



s2 = Variance of the stock's rate of return

= Variance of the project's rate of return













Find current value of the additional project's cash flows. This includes all cash flows except cost of implementation.


















Cost
Future Operating Cash Flows of Additional Project (Discount at WACC) Discount at WACC since these are risky cash flows. This should include all cash flows, just like the price of a stock includes all cash flows, even those that occur if you don't exercise a stock option. Also, since a stock's price isn't affected by an option's exercise price, the current value of the project is not affected by the "exercise" cost of the real option. NPV this Prob.
0 Probability 1 2 3 4 5 6 Scenario x NPV












$0 $0 $0 $9 $9 $9 $15.39 $4.62










40% $0 $0 $0 $4 $4 $4 $6.84 $2.74

30%









$0 $0 $0 -$1 -$1 -$1 -$1.71 -$0.51








Expected NPV of Future Operating CFs = $6.84





















kRF = 6%







t = 3







X = $10.00







P = $6.84







s2 = 22.0%

















d1 = { ln (P/X) + [kRF + s2 /2) ] t } / (s t1/2 )

= 0.160



d2 = d1 - s (t 1 / 2)

= -0.65



N(d1)= Use the NORMSDIST function. 0.56







N(d2)= Use the NORMSDIST function. 0.26

















V = P[ N (d1) ] - Xe-kRF t [ N (d2) ]

= $1.71














Value of original project= NPV from part a. -$0.39







Value of growth option= $1.71







Total Value= $1.31















Even though the original project has a negative NPV, the value of the growth option is large enough so that the combination of the original project and the growth option is greater than zero. Therefore, the project should be accepted.




































































































































































































































































































Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
10 Metody otrzymywania zwierzat transgenicznychid 10950 ppt
10 dźwigniaid 10541 ppt
wyklad 10 MNE
Kosci, kregoslup 28[1][1][1] 10 06 dla studentow
10 budowa i rozwój OUN
10 Hist BNid 10866 ppt
POKREWIEŃSTWO I INBRED 22 4 10
Prezentacja JMichalska PSP w obliczu zagrozen cywilizacyjn 10 2007
Mat 10 Ceramika
BLS 10
10 0 Reprezentacja Binarna
10 4id 10454 ppt
10 Reprezentacja liczb w systemie komputerowymid 11082 ppt

więcej podobnych podstron