2766504878

2766504878



MaterniT Lab Report

GENOME

Scqucnom Laboratories

3595 John Hopkins Court, San Diego. CA 92121

FINAŁ REPORT

CLI A#: 05D2015356 CAP#: 7527130 Lab Director Phillip Cacherts. MD. PhD Tal: 877.821.7266

Ordering Provider:

Wójcicki, Jakub

Patient:

Wolna Pasek, Maria

Provider Location:

Polska Medycyna Prenatalna

DOB:

01/02/1982

Provider Phone:

+48 791 370 105

Patient ID:

pid1071807728

Datę Ordered:

04/17/2018

Specimen:

1810700095

Datę Collected:

04/17/2018

External Accession:

Datę Received:

04/19/2018

Referral Clinician:

Order ID:

ORD18107-01094

Datę Reported:

04/21/2018 02:38 PM PT

About the Test

The MaterniT™ GENOME laboratory-developed test analyzes the relative amount of chromosomal materiał across the genome in circulating cell-free DNAfrom a matemal blood sample. The test is indicated for use in pregnant women with singleton pregnancies at risk of fetal chromosomal and/or subchromosomal abnormalities.

Test Method

Circulating cell-free DNA was purified from the plasma component of anti-coagulated maternal whole blood. A genomie DNA library was prepared to determine chromosomal representation by massively parallel sequencing.:n Gain or loss of chromosomal materiał s7 Mb was evaluated across the entire genome. Select chromosomal regions (1p. 4p. 5p. 8q. 11q, 15q. and 22q) associated with known syndromes were also evaluated.

Performance

The MaterniT™ GENOME test utilizes the same proprietary technology as the MatemiT21* PLUS test. with deeper sequencing. In a clinical study using 448 patient samples to evaluate ooncordance. the MaterniT™ GENOME test was equivalent in performance for the analysis of trisomy 21. trisomy 18. trisomy 13. sex chromosome aneuploidies and fetal sex classification. to the MatemiT21* PLUS test.!?] The MatemiT21* PLUS test performance has previously been validated and published extensively.tii.fW3

The MaterniT™ GENOME test performance characteristics for the detection of genome-wide gain or loss events s7 Mb. and select microdeletions below 7 Mb were established using in silico analytic methods. and validated using test samples comprised of genomie DNA mixed with plasma from non-pregnant females.i?: Sensitivity for genome-wide events greater than or equal to 7 Mb was determined to be 95.9%. Sensitivities for select microdeletions varied by size of the event and fetal fraction. Specificity for genome-wide events and select microdeletions was established using 1060 matemal plasma DNA samples and was determined to be >99.9%.

Additional details can be found in the table below. and at http://sequenom.eom/genome./performance.

‘doTnancc Characteristics

Region (associated syndrome)

Size Rangę (Mb)'

Median Size (Mb)*

Estimated

Sensitiyity-

Estimated

Specificity

Genome-wide

NA

NA

96% (61-> 99%)

> 99.9%

22q11.2 (DiGeorge)

0.8-3.6

2.6

> 74% (17-94%)

> 99.9%

15q11.2 (Proder-Willi & Angelmon)

1.2-15.8

5.1

> 59% (16-74%)

> 99.9%

11q23 (Jacobsen)

1.3-15.7

9

> 87% (57-> 99%)

> 99.9%

8q24.11-q24.13 (Langer-Giedion)

76-8.8

7.9

> 97% (80-> 99%)

> 99.9%

5p15.3 (Cri du Chat)

1.5-17.8

6

> 83% (48-96%)

> 99.9%

4p16.3 (Wolf-Hirschhorn)

1.1-17.3

4.2

> 73% (37-91%)

> 99.9%

1p36 (1p36 deletion syndrome)

1.6-13.3

3.8

> 51% (13-81%)

> 99.9%

* As reported in ISCAćatabase nstd37 [htJp://dbsearch.clinicalgenome.org/search/]

** Sensitivity estimated across the observed size distribution of each syndrome [per ISCA database nstd37] and across the rangę of fetal fractioos observed in routine clinical NIPT. Figures in parentheses indicate upper and lower estimates for sensitiyity Actual sensibvity can also be influenced by



Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
MaterniT Lab ReportGENOME Scqucnom Laboratories 3595 John Hopkins Court, San Diego. CA 92121 CLIA#:
MaterniT Lab Report GENOME Sequenom Laboratories 3595 John Hopkins Court. San Diego. CA 92121 CLI A#
sipr lab Harmonogram zajęć laboratoryjnych z przedmiotu: Sterowanie i programowanie robotówdla kieru
RUBRIC FOR ASSESSING LAB REPORTS 1 Bcglnnlng or Inrotnplftc 2 IH-wlopIng 3 . l l OllipilMK
giMEMS w    lab Modelowanie mikrosystemów - laboratorium Ćwiczenie 1 Modelowanie
Sample Lab Reportpago 1Boa Awesome Partners Marie Curie. AJbert Einstein January 1. 2020 Finding the
Expenncnt Lab Report Wrtte-ip Crłtcro A^iicclChan rry 25! łi(Jir«i Azi Kftrtrtt Ittoarfary ¥uC€ffit
Na me:CHEf.USTKY FORMAL LAB REPORT RUBRIC Categortes Poor Fair Good Format Man»gramma«cał
Ethan Vanderbyl Lab Report2 Dr. Chen Physics234 TitlerThe Photo ElectricEffect Datę:
elo lab zakres wymaganw LABORATORIUM ELEKTROTECHNIKI Ćwiczenie 1, OBWODY PRĄDU STAŁEGO Wiadomości te
LAB-EL ELEKTRONIKA LABORATORYJNA Sp. J. ■pl 05-816 Reguły, ul. Herbaciana 9, POLAND NIP:
MICRO PROCESSORS & MICROCONTROLLERS LAB (EE 432) LABORATGRY MANUAŁ IY/IY B.E ISEM EEE/EIE DEPART
DZIAŁ PROJEKTOWANIA LAB RO Technologie LABORATORIÓWRECORE WSPARCIE W
Lab Report:Celi Membranę Structure and Transport I. Purposc of this cxcrci*e: 2. Dcfinc solu te. sol
Lab Report:Celi Membranę Structure and Transport I. Purpoie of this excrcifc:v -W sAv(iŁ-kiVr. cfc -
LAB REPORT 3TYaiLsport flirou^h CeliMembranes , OfM-nOc O* ITWmtmi ol India Ink pan*,to Va» ii
Ponadto w roku 2014 swą działalność w UW rozpoczęło Digital Economy Lab (DELab) czyli Laboratorium G
Lab Report Template Name lesJie Holden Datę 09/01/2020 Teacher Name Annę Burton Time 12

więcej podobnych podstron