lecture 9 robust design id 2643 Nieznany

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

1

Robust Design

A New Definition of Quality.
The Signal-to-Noise Ratio.
Orthogonal Arrays.

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

2

The Taguchi Philosophy

Quality is related to the total loss to society due to
functional and environmental variance of a given product

Quality is related to the total loss to society due to
functional and environmental variance of a given product

Taguchi's method focuses on Robust Design through use of:

• S/N Ratio to quantify quality

• Orthogonal Arrays to investigate quality

Taguchi starts with a new definition of Quality:

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

3

Meeting the specs vs. hitting the target

better quality

worse quality

m

m-5

m+5

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

4

Quadratic Loss Function:

L(y) = k (y - m)

2

Fig 2.3 pp 18 from

Quality Engineering Using Robust Design

by Madhav S. Phadke

Prentice Hall 1989

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

5

Quadratic Loss Function on Normal Distribution

Average quality loss due to µ and

σ:

Fig 2.5 pp 26

E(Q) = k [(µ-m) +

σ ]

2

2

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

6

Exploiting non-linearity:

Fig 2.6 pp 28

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

7

Parameters are classified according to function:

Fig 2.7 pp 30

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

8

Orthogonal Arrays

b = (X

T

X)

-1

X

T

y

V(b) = (X

T

X)

-1

σ

2

During Regression Analysis, an orthogonal arrangement of
the experiment gave us independent model parameter
estimates:

Orthogonal arrays have the same objective:

For every two columns all possible factor combinations
occur equal times.

L

4

(2

3

) L

9

(3

4

) L

12

(2

11

) L

18

(2

1

x 3

7

)

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

9

Simple CVD experiment for defect reduction

max n = -10 log (MSQ def)

10

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

10

Simple CVD experiment for defect reduction (cont)

Using the L

9

orthogonal array:

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

11

Estimation of Factor Effects (ANOM)

m = 1

9

η

1

+

η

2

+

η

3

+...+

η

9

m

A

1

= 1

3

η

1

+

η

2

+

η

3

m

A

2

= 1

3

η

4

+

η

5

+

η

6

m

A

3

= 1

3

η

7

+

η

8

+

η

9

...

m

B

2

= 1

3

η

2

+

η

5

+

η

8

...

m

D

3

= 1

3

η

3

+

η

4

+

η

8

η A

i

,B

j

,C

k

,D

l

= μ+α

i

j

k

l

+e

α

i

= 0

Σ

β

i

= 0

Σ

γ

i

= 0

Σ

δ

i

= 0

Σ

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

12

Analysis of CVD defect reduction experiment

Fig 3.1 pp 46
Tab 3.4 pp 55

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

13

ANOVA for CVD defect reduction experiment

Grand total sum of squares:

η

i

2

= 19,425 (dB)

2

Σ

i=1

9

Total sum of squares:

η

i

-m

2

= 3,800 (dB)

2

Σ

i=1

9

Sum of squares due to mean:

m

2

= 15,625 (dB)

2

Σ

i=1

9

Sum of squares due to error:

e

i

2

= ??? (dB)

2

Σ

i=1

9

Sum of squares due to A: 3

m

A

i

-m

2

= 2,450 (dB)

2

Σ

i=1

3

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

14

ANOVA for CVD defect reduction experiment (cont)

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

15

Estimation of Error Variance

The experimental error is estimated from the ANOVA
residuals.

It is then used to estimate the error of the effects and to
determine their significance at the 5% level.

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

16

Confirmation Experiment

Once the optimum choice has been made, it is tested by
performing a confirmation run.

This run is used to "validate" the model as well as confirm
the improvements in the process.

Variance of prediction (for the model)

σ

pred

2

=

σ

e

2

n

0

+

σ

e

2

n

r

This gives us +/-2

σ limits on the confirmation experiment.

1

n

0

σ

e

2

= 1

n +

1

n

A

1

- 1

n +

1

n

B

1

- 1

n σ

e

2

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

17

The additive model

Fig 3.3 pp 63, enlarged 120%

Since we assumed additive model, we must make sure
that there are no interactions:

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

18

Example: Large CVD experiment.

Objectives:

a) reduce defects n = -10 log (MSQ Def)

b) maximize S/N of rate n'= 10 log (µ /

σ )

c) adjust poly thickness to a 3600 Å target.

10

10

2

2

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

19

Choosing the Control Factors

Tab 4.6-7 pp 88-90

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

20

Using the L

18

orthogonal array...

Tab 4.3 pp 78, enlarged 120%

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

21

Data summary for large CVD experiment:

Tab 4.5 pp 85, enlarged 120%

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

22

Data analysis for large CVD experiment (cont)

Fig 4.5 pp 86, enlarged 120%

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

23

ANOVA table for large CVD experiment:

η

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

24

ANOVA table for large CVD experiment :

η

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

25

ANOVA tables for large CVD experiment:

η’’

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

26

Combined Prediction Using the Additive Model

Tab 4.6-7 pp 88-90

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

27

Verification for large CVD experiment

Tab 4.10-11 pp 92

for further reading: Quality Engineering Using Robust Design by Madhav S. Phadke

Prentice Hall 1989

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

28

“Inner” and “Outer” Arrays

Often one want to improve performance based on some “control”
factors, in the presence of some “noise” factors.

Two arrays are involved: the inner array explores the “control”
factors, and the entire experiment is repeated across an array of the
noise factors.

Inner arrays are typically orthogonal designs

Outer arrays are typically small, 2-level fractional factorial designs.

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

29

Why use S/N Ratios?

• They lead to an optimum through a monotonic function.

• They help improve additivity of the effects.

=

⎟⎟

⎜⎜

=

⎟⎟

⎜⎜

=

i

i

STB

i

i

LTB

Y

n

N

S

Y

n

N

S

s

Y

N

S

2

2

2

2

1

log

10

1

1

log

10

log

10

Nominal is best:

Larger is better:

Smaller is better:

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

30

Taguchi vs. RSM

Taguchi

RSM

Small number of runs

Explicit control of Interactions

Engineering Intuition

Statistical Intuition

“Complete” package

Training Issues

Additive Models

More General Models

Orthogonal Arrays

Fractional Factorials

A “Philosophy”

A Tool

background image

Lecture 9: Robust Design

Spanos

EE290H F05

31

Design of Experiments

Comparison of Treatments
Blocking and Randomization
Reference Distributions
ANOVA
MANOVA
Factorial Designs
Two Level Factorials
Blocking
Fractional Factorials
Regression Analysis
Robust Design

Analysis

Modeling


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
Australian by design id 72410 Nieznany (2)
LOW EMI PCB DESIGN id 273292 Nieznany
lecture 14 CUSUM and EWMA id 26 Nieznany
lecture05 id 264350 Nieznany
lecture8 id 264393 Nieznany
lecture3 id 264379 Nieznany
lecture7 id 264390 Nieznany
lecture5 id 264383 Nieznany
JPA Lecture2 id 228757 Nieznany
pole placement robot design id Nieznany
lecture2 id 264375 Nieznany
lecture4 id 264381 Nieznany
Abolicja podatkowa id 50334 Nieznany (2)
4 LIDER MENEDZER id 37733 Nieznany (2)
katechezy MB id 233498 Nieznany
metro sciaga id 296943 Nieznany
perf id 354744 Nieznany
interbase id 92028 Nieznany

więcej podobnych podstron