Zielona herbata id 590210 Nieznany

background image

Green tea preparation and its influence on the content of bioactive compounds

Drazˇenka Komes

*

, Dunja Horzˇic´, Ana Belšcˇak, Karin Kovacˇevic´ Ganic´, Ivana Vulic´

Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

a r t i c l e

i n f o

Article history:
Received 24 April 2009
Accepted 22 September 2009

Keywords:
Antioxidant capacity
Bioactive composition
Green tea
HPLC
Preparation

a b s t r a c t

The effect of different extraction conditions and storage time of prepared infusions on the content of bio-
active compounds of green teas and their antioxidant capacity were investigated. The content of total
phenols, total flavonoids and total non-flavonoids in green teas was determined spectrophotometrically,
while 7 flavan-3-ols, 6 phenolic acids and 3 methylxanthines were identified and quantified by using high
performance liquid chromatography (HPLC–PDA). Among the tested green teas bagged green tea Twinings
of London was recognized as the richest source of phenolic compounds (3585 mg/L GAE of total phenols).
The most abundant phenolic constituents of green tea were flavan-3-ols, of which EGCG was prevailing in
all teas (94.54–357.07 mg/L). The highest content of caffeine, as the most abundant methylxanthine, was
determined in powdered green tea. The findings of this investigation suggest that extraction efficiency of
studied bioactive compounds from green tea depends on the extraction conditions and that maximum
extraction efficiency is achieved during aqueous extraction at 80 °C, for 5

0

(powder), 15

0

(bagged) and

30

0

(loose leaf). In order to determine the antioxidant capacity of teas the DPPH, ABTS and FRAP assays

were applied. Regardless of the extraction conditions all green teas exhibited significant antioxidant
capacity in vitro, which was in correlation with their phenolic content, confirming that green tea is one
of the best dietary sources of antioxidants.

Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

Freshly prepared infusion of dried leaves and buds of the plant

Camellia sinensis has been consumed for thousands of years as a
desirable beverage (

Scharbert, Holzmann, & Hofmann, 2004

). It is

appreciated because of its attractive aroma and taste characteris-
tics as well as beneficial health effects. Tea plant grows in a form
of an evergreen shrub in areas with suitable cultivation conditions
(optimal temperature in the range of 15–20 °C, high relative
humidity and annual rainfall) (

Li, Gu, & Ye, 2007

). Tea leaves are

manually harvested after each flush (the sprouting of the top two
leaves and bud) and then processed. In traditional green tea man-
ufacturing process the leaves of Camellia sinensis are harvested,
withered, rolled, and quickly steamed or heated to prevent enzy-
matic degradation of polyphenols. The most important biochemi-
cal process in harvested tea leaves is enzymatic oxidation, which
starts as soon as the integrity of the cells is broken, but other types
of enzymes, such as esterases, glycosidases and decarboxylases
may also catalyze transformations and degradations of polypheno-
lic compounds (

Cheynier, 2005

). Heat or steam inactivation of en-

zymes responsible for degradation retains a considerable amount
of the original biologically active components of green tea and also
produces some unique products.

Tea’s beneficial health effects are thought to stem from poly-

phenols with antioxidant properties. Green tea contains polyphe-
nols which include flavanols, flavandiols, and phenolic acids (up
to 30% of dry weight). The most important flavonoids are catechins,
which are present at about 10% of the dry weight basis (

Yamamoto,

Juneja, Chu, & Kim, 1997

). Six major catechins known to display

biological activity are (+)-catechin (C), ()-epicatechin (EC),
()-epigallocatechin

(EGC),

()-gallocatechin

gallate

(GCG),

()-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and ()-epicatechin gallate
(ECG). These native phenolic compounds are strong antioxidants
with antimutagenic, anticarcinogenic, hypocholesterolemic, anti-
bacterial, antiallergic and other clinically relevant activities.

Kao,

Hiipakka, and Liao (2000)

found that among green tea polyphenols

especially

()-epigallocatechin

gallate

(EGCG)

significantly

reduced food intake, body weight, blood levels of testosterone,
estradiol, leptin, insulin, insulin-like growth factor I, LH, glucose,
cholesterol and triglyceride, as well as growth of the prostate,
uterus and ovary.

Green tea also contains methylxanthines: caffeine (1,3,5-trim-

ethylxanthine) and two minor isomeric dimethylxanthines, theo-
bromine and theophylline, which are responsible for mildly
stimulant effects of the tea (

Anaya, Cruz-Ortega, & Waller, 2006;

Cloughley, 1981

). Besides being very important factors in tea

quality, these compounds are also reported to exhibit beneficial
health effects. Selected studies describe the use of caffeine to en-
hance mental activity, running performance, and to treat apnoea
and migraine headaches, and implementation of theophylline

0963-9969/$ - see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:

10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.022

*

Corresponding author. Tel.: +385 1 4826252; fax: +385 1 4826251.
E-mail address:

dkomes@pbf.hr

(D. Komes).

Food Research International 43 (2010) 167–176

Contents lists available at

ScienceDirect

Food Research International

j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / f o o d r e s

background image

and theobromine in asthma and bradycardia treatment (

Friedman,

Levin, Choi, Kozukue, & Kozukue, 2006

).

Besides phenolic compounds and methylxanthines, tea provides

a significant dietary source of polysaccharides, vitamin B complex,
vitamin C, vitamin E, R-aminobutyric acid, fluoride, as well as min-
erals and trace elements such as K, Mn, Cr, Ni and Zn (

Fernandez,

Pablos, Martın, & Gonzalez, 2002

).

The main objectives of the present study were: (A) to determine

the effect of different extraction conditions (temperature of water,
extraction time and multiple extraction) on the content of phenolic
compounds and methylxanthines in different green teas; (B) to
determine the antioxidant capacity of green teas depending on
extraction conditions and storage time of prepared infusion; and
(C) to compare the content of studied bioactive compounds in
loose leaf, bagged and powdered green teas.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Chemicals

Folin–Ciocalteu, formic acid, ammonium peroxodisulphate,

sodium carbonate, sodium acetate trihydrate, acetic acid, hydro-
chloric acid, ferric chloride hexahydrate and ferric sulphate hepta-
hydrate were of analytical grade and supplied by Kemika (Zagreb,
Croatia). Formaldehyde was obtained from Alkaloid (Skopje,
Macedonia). DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) was supplied
by Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland) and methanol (HPLC grade) was
purchased from J.T. Baker (Deventer, Netherlands). Trolox
(6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid), TPTZ
(2,4,6-tripyridyl-S-triazine),

ABTS

(2,2

0

-azino-bis(3-ethylbenz-

thiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) diammonium salt) as well as caffeine
(CF), theobromine (TB), theophylline (TP), ()-epicatechin (EC),
()-epigallocatechin

gallate

(EGCG),

()-epicatechin

gallate

(ECG), (+)-gallocatechin (GC), ()-gallocatechin gallate (GCG), (+)-
catechin (C), gallic acid (GA), protocatehuic acid (PcA), chlorogenic
acid (ChlA), ferulic acid (FA), p-coumaric acid (p-coumA) and vanil-
lic acid (VA) were obtained from Aldrich (Sigma–Aldrich Chemie,
Steinheim, Germany).

2.2. Sample preparation

Eleven green teas in powdered (Matcha), loose leaf (Gyokuro,

Sencha

J

, Bancha, Kukicha, Longjing, Yunnan, Sencha

CH

and Gunpow-

der) and bagged (Twinings of London and Franck) forms and two
blends of green and herbal teas in loose leaf (Rose of the Orient)
and bagged (Taylors of Harrogate) forms were purchased from a
specialized tea store. In order to simulate beverage brewing, teas
were prepared using an aqueous extraction procedure. In order
to study the effect of different extraction condition on the polyphe-
nol and methylxanthine content of tea samples, following extrac-
tion procedures were applied:

(a) Different water temperature – tea samples (2.0 g) were

extracted in 200 mL of distilled water (60, 80 and 100 °C)
and stirred with a glass rod for 3 min.

(b) Different extraction time – samples were extracted for 3, 5,

10, 15 and 30 min, with water heated to 80 °C.

(c) Multiple extractions – each tea sample was extracted three

times under the same conditions (80 °C/3 min) to produce
first, second and third extract.

After extraction, the infusions were filtered through a tea

strainer.

The changes related to the content of bioactive compounds as

well as antioxidant capacity of prepared infusions (80 °C/3 min)

were also studied during storage at the room temperature for 1,
2, 4, 6 and 24 h. To determine the effect of milk or lemon juice
on the antioxidant capacity of tea samples, 5 mL of milk or freshly
squeezed lemon juice was added to 100 mL of tea extract.

2.3. Determination of total phenols and flavonoids

Total phenol content (TPC) in tea extracts was determined spec-

trophotometrically according to a modified method of

Lachman,

Hosnedl, Pivec, and Orsák (1998)

, with Folin–Ciocalteu’s reagent.

Briefly, 0.5 mL of the sample was added into a 50 mL volumetric
flask containing 2.5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu’s reagent, 30 mL of dis-
tilled water and 7.5 mL of 20% Na

2

CO

3

, and filled up to the mark

with distilled water. Two hours later, the absorbance of blue color-
ation was measured at 765 nm against a blank sample. Gallic acid
was used as the standard and the results are expressed as mg/L of
gallic acid equivalents (GAE).

In order to determine the content of flavonoids (TFC), precipita-

tion with formaldehyde was employed. Addition of formaldehyde
leads to the reactions with C-6 or C-8 on 5,7-dihydroxy flavonoid
and formation of methyl derivates that further react with other fla-
vonoid compounds also at positions C-6 and C-8. The condensed
products of these reactions are removed by filtration and the
remaining non-flavonoid phenols (TNC) are determined as previ-
ously described. Flavonoid content was calculated as the difference
between total phenol and non-flavonoid content (

Kramling & Sin-

gleton, 1969

). All measurements were performed in triplicate.

2.4. Determination of antioxidant capacity

2.4.1. Free radical scavenging ability by the use of DPPH radical

The samples were analyzed according to the method reported

by

Brand-Williams, Cuvelier, and Berset (1995)

. This method is

based on the reduction of a stable DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-pic-
rylhydrazyl) radical by methanolic solution of antioxidants, which
alters the purple color of the DPPH radical solution to a bright
yellow. Change of the coloration causes absorbance decrease,
which can be measured spectrophotometrically (

Blois, 1958

). In

brief, a volume of 3.8 mL of methanolic DPPH solution, c(DPPH) =
0.094 mmol/L, was added to 200

l

L of diluted sample. Free radical

scavenging capacity of the sample was evaluated by measuring the
absorbance at 517 nm immediately after the addition of DPPH
(t = 0) and at 1 min intervals until the reaction, i.e. corresponding
absorbance, reached its steady state. Antioxidant capacity was ex-
pressed as mmol/L Trolox equivalents, using the calibration curve
of Trolox (0–1000

l

M), a water soluble vitamin E analogue. All

determinations were performed in triplicate.

2.4.2. Free radical scavenging ability by the use of ABTS radical cation

Determination of antioxidant capacity of tea infusions was con-

ducted by Flow Injection Analysis (FIA) with electrochemically
generated ABTS radical cation (

Ivekovic´, Milardovic´, Roboz, & Gra-

baric´, 2005

). This method is based on the scavenging of stable

blue–green ABTS radical cation (ABTS*

+

), formed either by chemi-

cal (

Re et al., 1999; Van der Berg, Haenen, Van der Berg, & Bast,

1999

) or enzymatic (

Arnao, Cano, & Acosta, 2001; Lemanska

et al., 2001

) oxidation of ABTS several hours prior to the analysis.

The amount of ABTS radical cation scavenged by antioxidants is
measured by monitoring the decrease of absorbance of ABTS radi-
cal cation, and compared with the decrease of absorbance pro-
duced by the addition of a known amount of Trolox, a water
soluble vitamin E analogue. In order to avoid the time consuming
step of ABTS radical cation preparation, FIA modification of TEAC
method was employed. FIA is based on the electrochemical pro-
duction of ABTS radical cation in the electrolysis flow-cell forming
the part of FIA system (

Ivekovic´ et al., 2005

). A 0.1 mol/L phosphate

168

D. Komes et al. / Food Research International 43 (2010) 167–176

background image

buffer solution (pH = 7.40) was used as a carrier stream, and the
solution of ABTS radical cation generated electrochemically was
employed as a second (reagent) stream. Both streams were
pumped at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The carrier and reagent
streams were mixed by passing through a mixing coil and the
absorbance at 734 nm was monitored by a detector placed
immediately after the mixing coil. For the analysis an aliquot of
20

l

L of diluted sample was injected into the carrier stream. The

height of the FIA peak obtained by the sample injection (

D

A

sample

)

was compared with the height of the peak produced by the
injection of 0.6 mmol/L Trolox solution (

D

A

Trolox

). The TEAC values

were then determined according to the formula: TEAC =

D

A

sample

c(Trolox)/

D

A

Trolox

, and expressed as equivalent concentration of

Trolox.

2.5. Determination of ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP assay)

The ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP) assay was carried

out according to

Benzie and Strain (1996)

. This assay measures the

change in absorbance at 593 nm owing to the formation of a blue
colored Fe

II

-tripyridyltriazine compound from the colorless oxi-

dized Fe

III

form by the action of electron donating antioxidants

(

Benzie, Chung, & Strain, 1999

). FRAP reagent was prepared by

mixing acetic buffer, TPTZ and FeCl

3

 6H

2

O (20 mM water solu-

tion) at a ratio of 10:1:1. Briefly, to a volume of 200

l

L of tea ex-

tract 3.8 mL of FRAP reagent was added. After 4 min the
absorbance of blue coloration was measured against a blank sam-
ple. A standard curve was prepared using different concentrations
(100–1200

l

mol/L) of Fe

2+

. All measurements were performed in

triplicate.

2.6. HPLC analysis of phenolic compounds and methylxanthines

Varian HPLC system (Varian, Walnut Creek, USA) consisting of

Pro Star Solvent Delivery System 230 and Pro Star 330 photodiode
array detector (PDA) and controlled by Star Chromatography
Workstation Version 5 software was used for HPLC analysis of
samples. Separation was performed using a reversed-phase Pinna-
cle II C-18 column (Restek, USA) (250 mm  4.6 mm, 5

l

m i.d.).

The samples were filtered through a 0.45

l

m membrane filter (Ny-

lon Membranes, Supelco, USA) and 20

l

L of each sample was in-

jected for HPLC analysis. The mobile phase consisted of 3%
formic acid (solvent A) and HPLC grade methanol (solvent B) at a
flow rate of 1 mL/min. The elution was performed with a gradient
starting at 2% B to reach 32% B at 20 min, 40% B at 30 min and 95%

B at 40 min, and becoming isocratic for 5 min. Chromatograms
were recorded at 278 nm. PDA detection was performed by record-
ing the absorbance of the eluate between 200 and 400 nm, with a
resolution of 1.2 nm (

Horzˇic´ et al., 2009

). Phenolic compounds

were identified by comparing the retention times and spectral data
with those of authentic standards. All analyses were repeated
three times.

2.7. Statistical analysis

All measurements were carried out in triplicate and the results

are statistically analyzed using the Statistica 6.0 program to deter-
mine the average value and standard error. ANOVA and Duncan’s
multiple range test were performed to determine the effect of
extraction conditions (tea form, water temperature, extraction
time, multiple extraction) and storage time on the content of bio-
active compounds and antioxidant capacity of green teas. Correla-
tion analysis was also performed using the same statistical
package.

3. Results and discussion

The effect of different extraction conditions (tea form, water

temperature, extraction time and multiple extractions) and storage
time of prepared infusions on the content of phenolic compounds
and methylxanthines of green teas and their antioxidant capacity
were studied. Green tea is a very popular beverage because of its
attractive aroma, taste and beneficial effects. Nowadays, hundreds
of teas are produced. To make green tea, the leaves of Camellia sin-
ensis are chopped, rolled and quickly steamed or heated to inacti-
vate polyphenol oxidase. These processes retain a considerable
amount of original catechins of green tea, but they also result in
a development of some unique compounds (

Vinson & Dabbagh,

1998

). The consumption of green tea in western countries is a re-

cent trend and the market is continuously growing so the most
common commercially available types of green tea were tested
in this study.

Total phenol content (TPC) and total flavonoids content (TFC) of

13 green teas and their blends were determined spectrophotomet-
rically and presented on

Fig. 1

. As can be seen, all tested teas pres-

ent a rich source of phenolic compounds, the content of which
depends on the extraction conditions. The highest TPC and TFC
were detected in bagged green tea Twinings of London (2560 and
1920 mg/L GAE, respectively) and in powdered green tea Matcha

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Matcha

Gyokuro

Sencha

Bancha

Kukicha

Longjing

Yunnan

Sencha

Gunpowder Rose of the

Orient

Twinings of

London

Taylors of

Harrogate

Franck

POWDER

LOOSE LEAF

BAGGED

mg GAE/l

Total non flavonoids

Total flavonoids

J

CH

Fig. 1. Total non-flavonoid and flavonoid content in green teas extracted at 80 °C/3 min.

D. Komes et al. / Food Research International 43 (2010) 167–176

169

background image

(2230 and 1630 mg/L, respectively), while the lowest TPC and TFC
were detected in the green tea blend Rose of the Orient (880 and
440 mg/L, respectively). These results confirm the unique features
of each green tea analyzed in our study, which is in agreement with
the findings of

Vinson and Dabbagh (1998)

, who stated that the

composition of tea is influenced by the season, the age of the leaf,
climate, horticultural practices and a bit less by the effect of
locality.

In order to study the effect of different extraction conditions

(water temperature, time, multiple extraction) and storage time
on the polyphenol and methylxanthine content of tea samples,
powder (Matcha), loose leaf (Gyokuro) and bagged (Twinings of Lon-
don) green teas were tested. The effect of water temperature (60,
80 and 100 °C) and multiple extractions (1st, 2nd and 3rd) on
TPC and TFC of three different forms of green tea is shown on

Fig. 2

. Among the tested teas, bagged green tea was recognized

as the richest source of phenolic compounds (TPC and TFC), which
reached their maximum values when water heated to 100 °C was
used for the extraction (3585 and 2865 mg/L GAE, respectively).

The obtained results confirmed previously published data (

Per-

va-Uzunalic´ et al., 2006

) that water at higher temperature ex-

tracted higher TPC and TFC. Although the first extract of green
teas is often discarded due to excessive astringency, it is concluded
that the practice of reusing tea samples is not a good way of drink-
ing since most of health enhancing compounds (flavonoids)
decompose (

Astill, Birch, Dacombe, Humphrey, & Martin, 2001

).

Our results confirmed these statements, since in comparison with
1st extraction, 2nd and 3rd extractions of all three forms of green
tea at 80 °C (

Fig. 2

) yielded significantly (p < 0.05) lower TPC and

TFC.

All tea extracts showed considerable fluctuations of TNC and

TFC, with regard to prolonged extraction time (

Fig. 3

). In powder

and loose leaf green teas the prolonged extraction time (5

0

, 10

0

and 15

0

) resulted with higher TNC, while the TNC of 30

0

extracts

was decreasing. Bagged green tea extracts showed minor fluctua-
tions in TNC, and yielded the highest TNC in 30

0

extract. The TFC

of powdered green tea decreased in 5

0

extract, but increased in

all subsequent extracts, reaching the maximum in 30

0

extract.

The TFC of loose leaf and bagged green tea increased with pro-
longed extraction time, being the highest in 10

0

and 15

0

extracts

and then decreasing in 30

0

extracts, which indicates that prolonged

extraction time at high temperatures can lead to catechin

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

60°C 80°C (1st)

2nd

3rd

100°C

60°C 80°C (1st)

2nd

3rd

100°C

60°C 80°C (1st)

2nd

3rd

100°C

POWDER

LOOSE LEAF

BAGGED

mg GAE/L

Total non flavonoids

Total flavonoids

Fig. 2. Total non-flavonoid and flavonoid content in powder (Matcha), loose leaf (Gyokuro) and bagged (Twinings of London) teas affected by water temperatures (60, 80 and
100 °C) and multiple extractions at 80 °C/3 min.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3

5

10

15

30

3

5

10

15

30

3

5

10

15

30

POWDER

LOOSE LEAF

BAGGED

minutes

mg GAE/L

Total non flavonoids

Total flavonoids

Fig. 3. Total non-flavonoid and flavonoid content in powder (Matcha), loose leaf (Gyokuro) and bagged (Twinings of London) teas affected by extraction time (3, 5, 10, 15 and
30 min) at 80 °C.

170

D. Komes et al. / Food Research International 43 (2010) 167–176

background image

degradation (

Cheong, Park, Kang, Ko, & Seo, 2005

). The obtained re-

sults are in accordance with those reported by

Perva-Uzunalic´ et al.

(2006)

who observed that catechins tend to degrade during pro-

longed extraction time, as well as by using higher water
temperatures.

The content of non-flavonoids and flavonoids in all three differ-

ent forms of green tea was changed during storage time (

Fig. 4

).

Namely, considerable fluctuations of TNC and TFC were observed,
especially after 2 and 4 h of storage, when TNC and TFC increased,
and then gradually decreased after 6 and 24 h of storage at room
temperature. Although the initial increase was followed by a de-
cline in TNC and TFC, at the end of 24-h storage, all three forms of
green tea exhibited satisfying stability during storage of tea extract.

The main classes of polyphenols present in green tea are flava-

nols and flavonols. These compounds constitute 16–30% of the dry
weight of fresh leaf (

Graham, 1991

). Catechins (flavan-3-ols) are

the major polyphenolic constituents of tea. These compounds are
colorless and water soluble and contribute to bitterness and astrin-
gency of green tea infusions (

Del Rio et al., 2004

). Due to a complex

bioactive composition of tea infusions it is very important to deter-
mine their methylxanthine content as well as polyphenolic profile
of teas, which is associated with their significant antioxidant prop-
erties. In this study, previously developed HPLC procedure (

Horzˇic´

et al., 2009

) was performed and the content of flavan-3-ols, pheno-

lic acids and methylxanthines are summarized in

Tables 1–3

,

respectively. A comparison of the results, presented in these
Tables, showed that the most abundant bioactive constituents of
green tea were flavan-3-ols (ranging from 350.45 mg/L to
1073.15 mg/L), followed by methylxanthines (109.34–340.63
mg/L) and phenolic acids, which were determined in much lower
content (1.87–53.18 mg/L). As can be seen in

Table 1

, EGCG was

the prevailing phenolic compound in all teas, ranging from 94.54
mg/L (in loose leaf green tea Sencha

CH

) to 357.07 mg/L (in bagged

green tea Taylors of Harrogate). The content of catechins is in agree-
ment with the previously published reports by

Rusak, Komes, Likic´,

Horzˇic´, and Kovacˇ (2008)

, who determined EGC (32.8–58.0 mg/g),

EGCG (70.9–118.0 mg/g), GCG (4.0–8.5 mg/g) and ECG (14.9–
24.5 mg/g) in Long Jing green tea, extracted during 5, 15 and
30 min. The detected values of catechins in the analyzed samples
are also similar to those reported by

Reto, Figueira, Filipe, and Al-

meida (2007)

, who found 398.0–1127.0 mg/L of total catechins in

various green tea infusions, prepared with boiling water and

Wang,

Helliwell, and You (2000)

reported a little lower range of 33.4–

846.0 mg/L of catechins in different green tea samples prepared
also with boiling water. Considering the fact that water extraction
at 80 °C during 3

0

was performed for the purpose of present HPLC

analysis, the range of total flavan-3-ol content in tested green tea
extracts was in accordance with the total catechins content
(1067.9 mg/L) obtained by

Labbé, Tremblay, and Bazinet (2006)

,

who performed extractions with water at 80 °C during 5

0

. The com-

parison of the results is sometimes difficult due to the lack of uni-
formity in the conditions used to prepare tea infusions (ratio
leaves/water, extraction time, water temperature) as well as anal-
ysis methods.

Sencha

J

, Bancha and Kukicha are all Japanese tea types in loose

leaf forms, which are generally classified according to their regio-
nal origin, type of cultivation, processing and harvesting methods,
and composition. Sencha

J

is harvested in the early summer, Bancha

in the early fall, while Kukicha consists of a blend of leaves with the
stems and stalks normally discarded in the production of Sencha

J

and Gyokuro. Among the afore mentioned teas Sencha

J

contained

the highest content of some flavan-3-ols (169.27 mg/L of EGC,
208.71 mg/L of EGCG and 74.08 mg/L of ECG) and methylxanthines
(25.77 mg/L of TB and 5.92 mg/L of TF). The content of polyphenols
and methylxanthines in Kukicha green tea is closely similar to Sen-
cha

J

tea, even higher in case of EC, C, FA and CF, probably due to the

fact that Kukicha tea is a blend of Sencha

J

and Gyokuro teas, which

posses the highest content of these bioactive compounds. Bancha
tea had the lowest content of polyphenols (424.53 mg/L of total fla-
van-3-ols and 7.50 mg/L of total phenolic acids) and total methyl-
xanthines (125.04 mg/L).

Yunnan, Sencha

CH

and Gunpowder are Chinese teas, also in loose

leaf form, which differ in the processing method and tea prepara-
tion procedure. Yunnan originates from southwestern China and
it is produced from hand-rolled unopened tea buds, Sencha

CH

is

processed by steaming of the tea leaves, and Gunpowder is com-
posed of leaves that had been hand-rolled into tiny pellets. Gener-
ally, Sencha

CH

contained the lowest content of total flavan-3-ols

(350.45 mg/L), total phenolic acids (1.87 mg/L) and total methyl-
xanthines (109.34 mg/L), while Yunnan contained the highest con-
tent of these groups of bioactive compounds (886.13 mg/L,
40.56 mg/L and 316.8 mg/L, respectively).

Among the green tea blends, Franck and Twinings of London

(bagged forms) were analyzed in the present study. These blends
contain similar average flavan-3-ols, phenolic acids and methyl-
xanthines content, as the previously described pure green teas. In

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1

2

4

6

24

1

2

4

6

24

1

2

4

6

24

POWDER

LOOSE LEAF

BAGGED

hours

mg GAE/L

Total non flavonoids

Total flavonoids

Fig. 4. Total non-flavonoid and flavonoid content in powder (Matcha), loose leaf (Gyokuro) and bagged (Twinings of London) teas affected by extract storage time (1, 2, 4, 6 and
24 h).

D. Komes et al. / Food Research International 43 (2010) 167–176

171

background image

comparison with Franck tea, in which a lower content of total fla-
van-3-ols, phenolic acids and methylxanthines (683.29 mg/L,
10.38 mg/L and 280.74 mg/L, respectively) was detected, Twinings
of London tea was characterized with higher content of these com-
pounds (1073.15 mg/L, 53.18 mg/L and 280.74 mg/L, respectively).

Also, two blends of green and herbal teas; Taylors of Harrogate

(bagged form) and Rose of the Orient (loose leaf form) were studied.
Taylors of Harrogate is a blend of various green teas and lemon-
grass, while Rose of the Orient tea is green tea blended with jas-
mine, rosebuds, marigold and cornflower blossoms. The content
of extracted flavan-3-ols, phenolic acids and methylxanthines from
these blends followed the similar trend as the content of the same
compounds extracted from pure green teas. Therefore, total flavan-
3-ol content in these tea blends varied between 422.12 mg/L in
Rose of the Orient and 845.49 mg/L in Taylors of Harrogate, total
phenolic acid content is ranging from 27.23 mg/L in Rose of the Ori-

ent to 53.18 mg/L in Taylors of Harrogate, while total methylxan-
thines content varied between 125.96 mg/L in Rose of the Orient
and 340.63 mg/L in Taylors of Harrogate.

Green tea is an important source of methylxanthines, especially

caffeine. The leaf age is a very important factor because old leaves
contain less caffeine but more EGCG and total catechins than
young ones (

Lin, Wu, & Lin, 2003

). CF, TF and TB are the main

methylxanthines constituting the tea alkaloids, hence, they are
one of the most important factors of the quality of teas. The con-
tent of CF in tested green tea (

Table 3

) was between 99.21 mg/L

in Sencha

CH

(loose leaf green tea) and 300.00 mg/L in Matcha (pow-

dered green tea). The detected values are in agreement with previ-
ous findings by

Reto et al. (2007)

, who found 141.0–338.0 mg/L of

caffeine in various green tea infusions prepared with boiling water
during 10

0

, while

Labbé et al. (2006)

reported a content of

305.4 mg/L of CF in green tea extracts obtained during 5

0

at

Table 1
Content of flavan-3-ols [()-gallocatechin (GC), ()-epigallocatechin (EGC), ()-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), ()-epicatechin, (+)-catechin, ()-gallocatechin gallate (GCG),
()-epicatechin gallate (ECG) in green teas extracted at 80 °C/3 min.

Flavan-3-ols

Total

()-GC

()-EGC

()-EGCG

()-EC

()-C

()-GCG

()-ECG

Powder tea
Matcha

70.49 ± 1.03

324.88 ± 18.01

345.55 ± 21.23

120.07 ± 2.38

25.75 ± 1.21

6.62 ± 0.81

102.67 ± 2.89

996.03

Loose leaf teas
Gyokuro

51.10 ± 0.92

c

279.87 ± 12.10

e

324.54 ± 18.76

e

123.43 ± 5.44

c

19.70 ± 1.43

b

3.90 ± 0.45

a

108.55 ± 6.13

a

911.09

f

Sencha

J

44.34 ± 0.87

bc

169.27 ± 13.23

d

208.71 ± 11.89

d

70.37 ± 4.81

b

12.80 ± 0.92

b

n.d.

*

74.08 ± 6.23

c

579.57

d

Bancha

53.73 ± 1.21

c

159.55 ± 14.11

d

103.28 ± 8.15

a

68.83 ± 3.89

b

6.56 ± 0.84

a

n.d.

*

32.58 ± 2.51

a

424.53

b

Kukicha

31.39 ± 0.73

b

159.39 ± 11.86

d

163.22 ± 9.23

c

76.20 ± 4.11

b

14.62 ± 1.37

b

2.73 ± 0.23

a

50.11 ± 4.15

b

497.66

c

Longjing

17.94 ± 0.36

a

69.71 ± 2.12

a

209.95 ± 13.71

d

62.50 ± 5.26

ab

43.72 ± 2.25

c

n.d.

*

n.d.

*

403.82

a

Yunnan

88.95 ± 2.54

d

266.24 ± 8.70

e

178.80 ± 12.1

c

169.16 ± 10.23

d

50.98 ± 3.81

c

n.d.

*

310.80 ± 18.34

e

886.13

e

Sencha

CH

47.47 ± 1.11

bc

124.47 ± 10.35

c

94.54 ± 7.62

a

55.42 ± 3.71

a

n.d.

*

n.d.

*

28.55 ± 2.06

a

350.45

a

Gunpowder

89.09 ± 1.87

d

93.35 ± 9.76

b

116.25 ± 6.45

a

48.80 ± 3.42

a

6.48 ± 4.11

a

n.d.

*

39.43 ± 1.76

a

393.40

a

Rose of the Orient

46.90 ± 0.85

bc

122.40 ± 7.45

c

130.30 ± 6.13

b

52.39 ± 2.71

a

10.81 ± 0.97

b

n.d.

*

59.32 ± 4.50

b

422.12

b

Bagged teas
Twinings of London

192.12 ± 16.31

c

235.94 ± 18.73

b

326.80 ± 25.55

b

114.98 ± 9.18

b

27.58 ± 2.41

a

9.31 ± 0.73

b

166.42 ± 7.55

b

1073.15

c

Franck

114.37 ± 11.24

a

184.33 ± 11.37

a

191.59 ± 12.18

a

89.43 ± 7.21

a

24.99 ± 1.64

a

5.23 ± 0.47

a

75.35 ± 4.28

a

683.29

a

Taylors of Harrogate

137.23 ± 12.62

b

n.d.

*

357.07 ± 19.64

bc

141.94 ± 6.54

c

31.14 ± 3.95

a

n.d.

*

178.11 ± 9.64

b

845.49

b

n.d.

*

= not detected.

Values are expressed as means in mg/L ± SD. The same letters (a, b, c, d, e, f) denote the flavan-3-ols, whose content is not significantly (p > 0.05) different between green teas
in loose leaf form, as well as in bagged form.

Table 2
Content of phenolic acids [protocatehuic acid (PCA), ferulic acid (FA), gallic acid (GA), p-coumaric acid (p-coumA), chlorogenic acid (ChlA) and vanillic acid (VA)] in green teas
extracted at 80 °C/3 min.

Phenolic acids

Total

PcA

FA

GA

p-coumA

ChlA

VA

Powder tea
Matcha

0.94 ± 0.05

15.24 ± 0.89

1.73 ± 0.21

0.93 ± 0.09

n.d.

*

n.d.

*

18.84

Loose leaf teas
Gyokuro

n.d.

*

n.d.

*

1.07 ± 0.09

b

6.63 ± 0.72

e

2.92 ± 0.05

c

n.d.

*

10.62

bc

Sencha

J

0.99 ± 0.08

b

7.03 ± 0.91

a

1.14 ± 0.11

b

n.d.

*

n.d.

*

n.d.

*

9.16

b

Bancha

1.27 ± 0.11

c

5.43 ± 0.63

a

0.73 ± 0.06

a

0.07 ± 0.01

a

n.d.

*

n.d.

*

7.50

b

Kukicha

1.35 ± 0.09

c

13.66 ± 1.01

b

1.16 ± 0.21

b

0.69 ± 0.03

c

0.65 ± 0.10

a

n.d.

*

17.51

c

Longjing

0.83 ± 0.05

b

11.28 ± 0.94

b

6.49 ± 0.52

d

0.63 ± 0.04

c

0.63 ± 0.08

a

1.00 ± 0.09

a

20.86

c

Yunnan

1.30 ± 0.09

c

14.29 ± 0.67

b

2.69 ± 0.18

c

0.01 ± 0.0

a

2.48 ± 0.06

c

9.79 ± 1.23

b

40.56

d

Sencha

CH

0.99 ± 0.10

b

n.d.

*

0.88 ± 0.22

a

n.d.

*

n.d.

*

n.d.

*

1.87

a

Gunpowder

0.36 ± 0.03

a

10.89 ± 0.73

ab

9.39 ± 0.19

d

1.22 ± 0.03

d

1.28 ± 0.13

b

n.d.

*

23.14

c

Rose of the Orient

0.98 ± 0.06

b

24.82 ± 0.51

c

1.24 ± 0.07

b

0.19 ± 0.01

b

n.d.

*

n.d.

*

27.23

c

Bagged teas
Twinings of London

n.d.

*

n.d.

*

5.77 ± 0.32

b

4.46 ± 0.53

b

4.23 ± 0.21

a

n.d.

*

14.46

a

Franck

0.87 ± 0.07

a

7.10 ± 0.11

a

2.41 ± 0.24

a

n.d.

*

n.d.

*

n.d.

*

10.38

a

Taylors of Harrogate

0.70 ± 0.03

a

9.78 ± 0.83

b

14.70 ± 1.63

c

1.44 ± 0.09

a

4.16 ± 0.34

a

22.40 ± 0.04

53.18

b

n.d.

*

= not detected.

Values are expressed as means in mg/L ± SD. The same letters (a, b, c, d, e) denote the phenolic acids, whose content is not significantly (p > 0.05) different between green teas
in loose leaf form, as well as in bagged form.

172

D. Komes et al. / Food Research International 43 (2010) 167–176

background image

80 °C. For the healthy adult population, moderate daily caffeine in-
take at a dose content up to 400 mg/kg (6 mg/kg of body weight) is
not associated with adverse effects (

Nawrot et al., 2003

).

Table 4

shows the total flavan-3-ols, phenolic acids and methyl-

xanthines of green teas influenced by different water temperature,
multiple extractions, extraction time and storage time. The highest
total flavan-3-ols, phenolic acids and total methylxanthines in
powder green tea were determined for 3

0

and 5

0

extracts, in bagged

green tea the highest total content of these bioactive compounds
was obtained for 15

0

extracts, while in loose leaf green tea for 30

0

extracts. Considering the extraction dynamics of different tea
forms,

Cheong et al. (2005)

observed higher extraction yield of

tea in the powdered form (at 100 °C), in comparison to loose leaf
tea, due to larger specific area of powdered tea, thus allowing a
faster extraction efficiency of various tea constituents. The results
of

Hicks, Hsieh, and Bell (1996)

indicate a higher methylxanthines

content of green teas in loose leaf form, in relation to green teas

in bagged form. According to our results, bagged green tea
yielded the highest content of both total flavan-3-ols and methyl-
xanthines, while powder tea yielded the highest content of
phenolic acids.

The obtained results suggest that higher water temperature and

short extraction time, as well as lower water temperature and
longer extraction time are the best combination for the extraction
of bioactive compounds of green tea, allowing the best extraction
efficiency. According to some previously conducted studies there
is a dependence of catechin content to time and/or temperature.

Sharma, Gulati, and Ravindranath (2005)

observed that catechins,

especially EGCG, EGC and EC, showed marked differences when ex-
tracted at different temperatures. In a study on green tea,

Labbé

et al. (2006)

found that the best results in extraction of catechins

are achieved at 90 °C during 80 min.

Price and Spitzer (1993)

ex-

plained the effect of temperature on catechin extraction by a dif-
ference in their molecular weight.

Table 3
Content of methylxanthines [caffeine (CF), theobromine (TB) and theophyline (TP)] in green teas extracted at 80 °C/3 min.

Methylxanthines

Total

CF

TB

TP

Powder tea
Matcha

300.00 ± 21.12

12.18 ± 0.91

10.12 ± 0.67

322.30

Loose leaf teas
Gyokuro

296.86 ± 19.75

d

15.41 ± 0.28

b

6.49 ± 0.53

b

318.76

d

Sencha

J

162.50 ± 13.63

a

25.77 ± 1.17

c

5.92 ± 0.36

b

194.19

c

Bancha

113.96 ± 12.28

a

8.22 ± 1.23

a

2.86 ± 0.21

a

125.04

b

Kukicha

174.68 ± 9.71

b

17.80 ± 0.98

b

4.33 ± 0.36

ab

196.81

c

Longjing

248.38 ± 9.62

cd

63.53 ± 2.11

d

15.71 ± 1.35

c

327.62

d

Yunnan

201.62 ± 10.73

c

86.18 ± 4.16

d

29.08 ± 2.14

d

316.88

d

Sencha

CH

99.21 ± 6.54

a

7.55 ± 0.28

a

2.58 ± 0.46

a

109.34

a

Gunpowder

155.93 ± 9.11

b

26.04 ± 0.91

c

5.56 ± 0.45

b

187.53

c

Rose of the Orient

112.21 ± 5.47

a

10.82 ± 0.86

ab

2.93 ± 0.17

a

125.96

b

Bagged teas
Twinings of London

202.29 ± 16.51

b

58.65 ± 3.80

b

19.80 ± 1.01

b

280.74

b

Franck

151.73 ± 13.78

a

21.58 ± 1.11

a

8.57 ± 0.87

a

181.88

a

Taylors of Harrogate

246.71 ± 20.05

b

66.91 ± 0.94

b

27.01 ± 0.36

b

340.63

b

Values are expressed as means in mg/L ± SD. The same letters (a, b, c, d) denote the methylxanthines, whose content is not significantly (p > 0.05) different between green teas
in loose leaf form, as well as in bagged form.

Table 4
Changes in the content of total flavan-3-ols, phenolic acids and methylxanthines in powder, loose leaf and bagged green teas, depending on extraction conditions.

Total flavan-3-ols

Total phenolic acids

Total methylxanthines

Powder

Loose leaf

Bagged

Powder

Loose leaf

Bagged

Powder

Loose leaf

Bagged

Water temperature
60 °C

662.31 ± 32.02

730.16 ± 21.00

990.89 ± 21.81

17.05 ± 1.50

d

10.61 ± 1.04

g

18.12 ± 2.31

j

277.39 ± 23.51

253.41 ± 24.02

284.81 ± 19.11

80 °C

996.02 ± 36.24

911.15 ± 27.17

1073.22 ± 20.54

18.82 ± 2.31

d

10.68 ± 0.98

g

14.50 ± 1.91

j

322.33 ± 24.10

318.75 ± 18.93

280.73 ± 21.35

100 °C

972.89 ± 36.31

998.78 ± 18.97

1371.32 ± 39.21

19.53 ± 2.62

d

9.05 ± 1.10

g

16.33 ± 1.91

j

310.33 ± 22.42

330.18 ± 21.62

337.83 ± 25.61

Multiple extractions
1st extract

996.02 ± 36.24

911.15 ± 27.17

1073.22 ± 20.54

18.82 ± 2.31

10.68 ± 0.98

14.50 ± 1.91

322.33 ± 24.10

318.75 ± 18.93

280.73 ± 21.35

2nd extract

342.83 ± 24.15

337.56 ± 22.73

502.06 ± 34.08

6.38 ± 0.91

4.31 ± 0.32

2.76 ± 0.22

86.10 ± 19.46

135.64 ± 11.77

77.33 ± 10.48

3rd extract

247.26 ± 34.72

296.82 ± 19.05

212.16 ± 16.19

5.74 ± 0.15

2.35 ± 0.12

2.34 ± 0.56

28.09 ± 7.01

48.89 ± 8.26

72.49 ± 9.00

Extraction duration
3 min

996.03 ± 21.05

a

911.12 ± 23.61

1073.23 ± 22.85

18.80 ± 1.31

e

10.64 ± 0.96

h

14.56 ± 1.23

322.37 ± 23.13

l

318.76 ± 25.14

n

280.79 ± 22.16

5 min

997.82 ± 26.79

a

984.05 ± 25.48

1177.53 ± 36.91

18.86 ± 1.02

e

10.19 ± 0.83

h

13.92 ± 1.20

303.91 ± 24.05

l

291.53 ± 24.08

n

330.07 ± 23.75

10 min

992.81 ± 23.83

a

1166.14 ± 32.88

1400.68 ± 40.12

16.86 ± 1.28

e

10.54 ± 0.87

h

20.95 ± 1.46

295.07 ± 21.06

l

318.52 ± 27.21

n

367.93 ± 31.00

15 min

932.06 ± 34.18

a

1229.48 ± 36.01

1567.33 ± 42.35

16.63 ± 0.81

e

11.69 ± 1.04

h

26.56 ± 1.93

291.73 ± 25.81

l

335.46 ± 26.81

n

398.36 ± 32.86

30 min

566.55 ± 18.64

a

1431.89 ± 38.42

1006.40 ± 28.78

17.10 ± 1.13

e

12.47 ± 1.15

h

21.61 ± 1.57

229.65 ± 19.23

l

345.15 ± 29.03

n

331.91 ± 28.94

Storage time
1 h

848.04 ± 15.86

b

656.73 ± 22.07

904.15 ± 20.12

c

20.12 ± 1.66

f

9.02 ± 0.52

i

14.08 ± 1.14

k

292.09 ± 22.18

m

263.37 ± 18.48

o

267.72 ± 22.05

p

2 h

799.58 ± 19.71

b

748.72 ± 18.76

1030.62 ± 32.46

c

19.70 ± 1.34

f

9.02 ± 0.74

i

17.69 ± 1.29

k

286.34 ± 24.34

m

244.78 ± 21.04

o

306.00 ± 25.31

p

4 h

935.48 ± 24.32

b

198.99 ± 9.42

660.61 ± 19.65

c

19.44 ± 1.56

f

7.67 ± 0.61

i

9.45 ± 1.10

k

317.86 ± 19.96

m

167.35 ± 12.64

o

220.87 ± 17.94

p

6 h

767.09 ± 16.22

b

568.55 ± 11.93

1094.58 ± 31.54

c

15.61 ± 0.97

f

6.65 ± 0.84

i

15.84 ± 0.99

k

269.69 ± 20.85

m

236.06 ± 21.86

o

339.45 ± 30.57

p

24 h

829.96 ± 19.55

b

232.65 ± 14.30

1009.83 ± 30.98

c

18.89 ± 1.03

f

6.25 ± 0.27

i

14.13 ± 5.43

k

294.74 ± 28.10

m

172.97 ± 13.37

o

304.10 ± 32.80

p

Values are expressed as means in mg/L ± SD. The same letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p) denote the total flavan-3-ols, phenolic acids and methylxanthines, whose
content is not significantly (p > 0.05) affected by the extraction conditions.

D. Komes et al. / Food Research International 43 (2010) 167–176

173

background image

Repeated extractions of powder, loose leaf and bagged green

teas showed significant influence (p < 0.05) on the content of fla-
van-3-ols, phenolic acids and methylxanthines. As with the TPC
and TFC (

Fig. 2

), the content of flavan-3-ols, phenolic acids and

methylxanthines (

Table 4

) also gradually decreased in subsequent

extractions, so the lowest content was obtained in third extracts of
all green tea forms.

The changes in the composition of polyphenols and methylxan-

thines during 24 h storage of green tea extracts (at room tempera-
ture) is difficult to interpret and compare, due to the lack of similar
studies on tea extracts. As could be seen in

Table 4

, high variations

of total flavan-3-ols, phenolic acids and methylxanthines content
was observed, in the period of 24-h storage time, but finally after

24 h storage the content of polyphenols and methyxanthines in
all tea extracts decreased. The variation might be due to a great
abundance and variability of all tea constituents, which participate
in various reactions during storage of a tea infusion in the presence
of oxygen, such as polymerization, or even degradation of some tea
compounds.

Because individual catechins have different antioxidative and

health properties it is important to know the content of each one
of them in the infusions.

Toschi et al. (2000)

observed that the anti-

oxidant activity of green tea is higher in teas that contain higher
content of EGCG and EGC. According to previous findings by

Rice

Evans, Miller, and Paganga (1996)

who studied the antioxidant

activity of the polyphenolic constituents of green tea in relation

DPPH

0

3

6

9

12

mmol/L

T

rolox

ABTS

0

4

8

12

16

20

mmol/L

T

rolox

FRAP

0

5

10

15

20

25

Matcha

Gyokuro

Sencha

Bancha

Kukicha

Longjing

Yunnan

Sencha

Gunpowder Rose of the

Orient

Twinings of

London

Taylors of

Harrogate

Franck

POWDER

LOOSE LEAF

BAGGED

mmol/L

Fe2+

J

CH

Fig. 5. Antioxidant capacity of green teas prepared at 80 °C/3 min evaluated by using ABTS, DPPH and FRAP assays.

174

D. Komes et al. / Food Research International 43 (2010) 167–176

background image

to their relative compositions, the order of contribution to the anti-
oxidant effectiveness in green tea was EGC  EGCG  ECG = EC > C.
The scavenging abilities of EGCG and ECG are stronger even if the
steric hindrance of EGC, GC, EC and (+)-C is smaller than that of
EGCG and GCG, indicating that the presence of a gallate group at
the 3 position plays the most important role in their abilities to
scavenge free radicals (

Guo et al., 1999

).

Antioxidant capacity of green teas prepared at 80 °C/3

0

and

determined with DPPH, ABTS and FRAP assays is shown on

Fig. 5

.

As can be seen, Twinings bagged green tea exhibits the highest anti-
oxidant capacity (10.58 mmol/L Trolox), while Gunpowder loose
leaf green tea the lowest (4.36 mmol/L Trolox). As previously de-
scribed, Gunpowder is made up of leaves that had been hand-rolled
into tiny pellets, so the 3

0

extraction time is most likely insufficient

to extract a higher antioxidant content.

The order of antioxidant capacities of green teas influenced by

different water temperatures (

Table 5

) is in accordance with the

TPC determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu method, which is con-
firmed by a high linear correlation obtained between the results
(r

DPPH/TPC

= 0.876, r

FRAP/TPC

= 0.595 and r

ABTS/TPC

= 0.912). In all

green teas an increase in antioxidant capacities was consistent
with the increase of water temperature used for the extraction. A
high correlation was as well observed by correlating the antioxi-
dant capacities with the TPC in subsequent extracts of green teas
(r

DPPH/TPC

= 0.928, r

FRAP/TPC

= 0.902 and r

ABTS/TPC

= 0.882), which im-

plies that the antioxidant potential of green tea is directly related
to their phenolic content.

Prolongation of the extraction time of bagged and loose leaf

green tea, also significantly (p < 0.05) affected the antioxidant
capacity, while in the case of powder tea extraction time do not
have significantly (p > 0.05) effect on its antioxidant capacity (

Ta-

ble 5

). The antioxidant capacities of 3

0

, 5

0

and 10

0

extracts gradually

increased, reaching maximum value after 15

0

and 30

0

extraction,

depending on the type of tea and the applied antioxidant assay.

Also, during 24-h storage at room temperature, fluctuations in
the antioxidant capacities of all green teas were observed, as
shown in

Table 5

. In the first 6 h, the antioxidant capacity of the

analyzed green tea extracts increased and after 6 h of storage time,
almost all studied extracts exhibited the highest antioxidant
capacity. After the 24-h storage, the final antioxidant capacities de-
creased, but were still higher than the initial values for loose leaf
and powder green tea. Bagged green tea exhibited lower antioxi-
dant capacity after 24-h, in comparison with the initial values.

According to

Pinelo, Manzocco, Nún

ˇ ez, and Nicoli (2004)

, the in-

crease in the antioxidant capacity could be explained by the strong
tendency of polyphenols to undergo polymerization reactions.
When the degree of polymerization exceeds a critical value, the in-
creased molecular complexity and steric hindrance reduce the
availability of hydroxyl groups in reactions with radicals, which
causes decrease in the antiradical capacity. This may explain the
observed decrease in antioxidant capacity of studied extracts,
which occurred after the initial increase.

The addition of milk and lemon to tea extracts exhibited diverse

impact on the antioxidant capacity of tea in our study (

Table 5

), as

well as in the literature survey.

Hollman, Van Het Hof, Tijburg, and

Katan (2001)

found that the addition of milk does not alter the

antioxidant properties of tea, while

Langley-Evans (2000)

stated

otherwise, claiming that due to the flavonoid-binding capacity of
milk proteins, the addition of milk can decrease the antioxidant po-
tential of black tea preparations. The addition of milk and lemon to
powdered Matcha tea mildly decreased its antioxidant capacity,
while in Gyokuro and Twinings the opposite was observed. The
antioxidant capacity of all three green tea forms increased with
the addition of lemon juice, which is directly attributed to the syn-
ergistic effect of ascorbic acid on the polyphenols present in tea ex-
tract (

Majchrzak, Mitter, & Elmadfa, 2004

). According to

Nicoli,

Anese, Parpinel, Franceschi, and Lerici (1997)

various environmen-

tal impacts such as cultivation conditions, industrial processing,

Table 5
Influence of the extraction conditions (water temperature, duration, multiple extractions, and additions) and extract storage time on the antioxidant capacity of powder loose leaf
and bagged green teas.

Powder form

Loose leaf form

Bagged form

DPPH

FRAP

ABTS

DPPH

FRAP

ABTS

DPPH

FRAP

ABTS

mmol/L Trolox

mmol/L Fe

2+

mmol/L Trolox

mmol/L Trolox

mmol/L Fe

2+

mmol/L Trolox

mmol/L Trolox

mmol/L Fe

2+

mmol/L Trolox

Water temperature
60 °C

9.84 ± 0.49

15.65 ± 0.73

9.72 ± 0.64

6.74 ± 0.46

4.6 ± 0.18

8.12 ± 0.43

8.10 ± 0.57

13.55 ± 0.36

13.63 ± 0.84

80 °C

9.77 ± 0.45

a

18.55 ± 0.69

11.43 ± 0.89

7.97 ± 0.35

g

6.1 ± 0.27

h

9.77 ± 0.54

10.58 ± 0.83

i

14.65 ± 0.97

16.99 ± 1.10

n

100 °C

12.54 ± 0.83

20.4 ± 0.64

11.88 ± 0.36

10.81 ± 0.72

10.4 ± 0.53

10.47 ± 0.62

14.49 ± 0.52

15.35 ± 0.67

19.17 ± 1.47

Multiple extractions
1st extract

9.77 ± 0.45

18.55 ± 0.69

11.43 ± 0.89

7.97 ± 0.35

6.1 ± 0.27

9.77 ± 0.54

10.58 ± 0.83

14.65 ± 0.97

16.99 ± 1.10

2nd extract

2.91 ± 0.17

3.37 ± 0.29

1.82 ± 0.12

3.01 ± 0.12

1.65 ± 0.10

4.95 ± 0.26

6.45 ± 0.25

6.35 ± 0.63

9.62 ± 0.62

3rd extract

1.72 ± 0.09

0.62 ± 0.03

0.48 ± 0.01

1.89 ± 0.05

0.55 ± 0.02

1.74 ± 0.07

3.73 ± 0.12

2.35 ± 0.06

1.97 ± 0.05

Additions
Tea + lemon

8.86 ± 0.82

a

7.55 ± 0.23

9.79 ± 0.53

8.54 ± 0.36

g

6.00 ± 0.09

h

6.21 ± 0.72

11.97 ± 1.02

i

11.00 ± 0.93

16.99 ± 1.23

n

Tea + milk

8.69 ± 0.45

a

8.65 ± 0.49

8.59 ± 0.87

8.16 ± 0.53

g

8.00 ± 0.71

h

6.34 ± 0.43

11.87 ± 0.91

i

17.30 ± 1.13

15.09 ± 0.83

n

Extraction duration
3 min

9.77 ± 0.33

b

18.55 ± 1.23

d

11.43 ± 0.75

e

7.97 ± 0.45

6.10 ± 0.42

9.77 ± 0.83

10.58 ± 0.93

j

14.65 ± 1.37

l

16.99 ± 0.73

o

5 min

10.15 ± 0.41

b

22.87 ± 0.93

d

13.34 ± 1.10

e

9.73 ± 0.17

21.95 ± 1.12

12.19 ± 0.54

14.13 ± 1.85

j

21.65 ± 1.85

l

10.08 ± 0.31

o

10 min

10.31 ± 0.23

b

23.45 ± 0.64

d

12.10 ± 0.98

e

11.66 ± 0.27

22.22 ± 1.71

13.16 ± 1.03

14.45 ± 1.13

j

20.40 ± 2.01

l

18.44 ± 1.34

o

15 min

10.93 ± 0.81

b

21.42 ± 0.48

d

15.33 ± 0.67

e

12.77 ± 0.91

24.80 ± 1.26

15.77 ± 0.77

16.00 ± 1.37

j

20.25 ± 0.27

l

21.75 ± 1.94

o

30 min

10.45 ± 0.46

b

10.66 ± 0.52

d

12.50 ± 1.34

e

13.45 ± 0.68

23.78 ± 1.86

18.37 ± 1.08

15.38 ± 0.33

j

20.20 ± 0.83

l

21.86 ± 1.39

o

Storage time
1 h

11.97 ± 0.93

c

7.40 ± 0.36

11.38 ± 0.25

f

8.83 ± 0.54

7.59 ± 0.74

9.54 ± 0.64

14.79 ± 0.36

k

17.20 ± 0.46

m

16.51 ± 0.83

p

2 h

9.54 ± 0.62

c

7.86 ± 0.41

13.22 ± 0.53

f

8.96 ± 0.23

7.87 ± 0.45

11.79 ± 0.38

13.48 ± 0.84

k

14.20 ± 0.73

m

17.02 ± 0.62

p

4 h

8.33 ± 0.54

c

18.67 ± 1.67

12.26 ± 0.63

f

9.75 ± 0.37

13.00 ± 0.12

10.19 ± 0.75

11.76 ± 0.37

k

14.65 ± 0.83

m

16.71 ± 0.73

p

6 h

10.85 ± 0.71

c

18.80 ± 2.07

14.02 ± 1.12

f

10.23 ± 0.41

15.37 ± 0.99

13.44 ± 0.74

14.99 ± 0.98

k

15.40 ± 0.75

m

16.90 ± 0.18

p

24 h

10.08 ± 0.78

c

7.87 ± 0.66

13.64 ± 1.22

f

9.49 ± 0.68

8.65 ± 0.71

11.48 ± 0.38

12.54 ± 0.32

k

14.40 ± 0.62

m

16.41 ± 0.49

p

Values are expressed as means in mg/L ± SD. The same letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p) denote the antioxidant capacity of teas, whose content is not significantly
(p > 0.05) affected by the extraction conditions.

D. Komes et al. / Food Research International 43 (2010) 167–176

175

background image

packaging and storaging can influence the antioxidant capacity of
tea. The antioxidant activities of putative antioxidants have been
attributed to various mechanisms. Among these are prevention of
chain initiation, binding of transition metal ion catalysts, decom-
position of peroxides, prevention of continued hydrogen abstrac-
tion and radical scavenging (

Diplock, 1997

).

4. Conclusion

This research is a contribution to the characterization of the sta-

bility of bioactive compounds of green teas during its preparation
and storage. The obtained results suggest significant differences in
the chemical composition of green teas commercially available in
Europe. Although green tea is a rich source of bioactive compounds
(polyphenols and methyxanthines) the extraction efficiency of
these compounds strongly depends on the extraction conditions.
The findings of this investigation suggest that maximum extraction
eficiency of studied bioactive compounds from green tea is
achieved during aqueous extraction at 80 °C, for 5

0

(powder), 15

0

(bagged) and 30

0

(loose leaf). Antioxidant capacity of all tested teas

was in correlation with the total phenol content, depending on the
extraction conditions.

References

Anaya, A. L., Cruz-Ortega, R., & Waller, G. R. (2006). Metabolism and ecology of

purine alkaloids. Frontiers in Bioscience, 11, 2354–2370.

Arnao, M. B., Cano, A., & Acosta, M. (2001). The hydrophilic and lipophilic

contribution to total antioxidant activity. Food Chemistry, 73, 239–244.

Astill, C., Birch, M. R., Dacombe, C., Humphrey, P. G., & Martin, P. T. (2001). Factors

affecting the caffeine and polyphenol content of black and green tea infusions.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49, 5340–5347.

Benzie, I. F. F., Chung, W. Y., & Strain, J. J. (1999). ‘‘Antioxidative” (reducing)

efficiency of ascorbate in plasma is not affected by concentration. Journal of
Nutritional Biochemistry, 10, 146–150.

Benzie, I. F., & Strain, J. J. (1996). The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a

measure of ‘‘antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Analytical Biochemistry, 239,
70–76.

Blois, M. S. (1958). Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical.

Nature, 181, 1199–1200.

Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E., & Berset, C. (1995). Use of free radical method

to evaluate antioxidant activity. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie, 28,
25–30.

Cheong, W. J., Park, M. H., Kang, G. W., Ko, J. H., & Seo, Y. J. (2005). Determination of

catechin compounds in Korean green tea infusions under various extraction
conditions by high performance liquid chromatography. Bulletin of Korean
Chemical Society, 26, 747–754.

Cheynier, V. (2005). Polyphenols in foods are more complex than often thought. The

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 81, 223S–229S.

Cloughley, J. B. (1981). Storage deterioration in Central African tea: The effect of

some production variables on theaflavin degradation. Journal of the Science of
Food and Agriculture, 32, 1229–1234.

Del Rio, D., Stewart, A. J., Mullen, W., Burns, J., Lean, M. E. J., Brighenti, F., et al.

(2004). HPLC–MS analysis of phenolic compounds and purine alkaloids in green
and black tea. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52, 2807–2815.

Diplock, A. T. (1997). Will the good fairies please prove us that vitamin E lessens

human degenerative disease? Free Radical Research, 27, 511–532.

Fernandez, P. L., Pablos, F., Martın, M. J., & Gonzalez, A. G. (2002). Study of catechin

and xanthine profiles as geographical tracers. Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry, 50, 1833–1839.

Friedman, M., Levin, C. E., Choi, S-H., Kozukue, E., & Kozukue, N. (2006). HPLC

analysis of catechins, theaflavins, and alkaloids in commercial teas and green
tea dietary supplements: Comparison of water and 80% ethanol/water extracts.
Journal of Food Science, 71, C328–C337.

Graham, H. N. (1991). Green tea composition, consumption and polyphenol

chemistry. Preventive Medicine, 21, 334–350.

Guo, Q., Zhao, B., Shen, S., Hou, J., Hu, J., & Xin, W. (1999). ESR study on the

structure–antioxidant activity relationship of tea catechins and their epimers.
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1427, 13–23.

Hicks, M. B., Hsieh, Y. H. P., & Bell, L. N. (1996). Tea preparation and its influence on

methylxanthine concentration. Food Research International, 29, 325–330.

Hollman, P. C. H., Van Het Hof, K. H., Tijburg, L. B. M., & Katan, M. B. (2001). The

addition of milk to tea does not affect the absorption of flavonoids from tea in
man. Free Radical Research, 34(3), 297–300.

Horzˇic´, D., Komes, D., Belšcˇak, A., Kovacˇevic´ Ganic´, K., Ivekovic´, D., & Karlovic´, D.

(2009). The composition of polyphenols and methylxanthines in teas and herbal
infusions. Food Chemistry, 115, 441–448.

Ivekovic´, D., Milardovic´, S., Roboz, M., & Grabaric´, S. B. (2005). Evaluation of

antioxidant activity by flow injection analysis method with electrochemically
generated ABTS radical cation. Analyst, 130, 708–714.

Kao, Y. H., Hiipakka, R. A., & Liao, S. (2000). Modulation of endocrine systems and

food intake by green tea epigallocatechin gallate. Endocrinology, 141, 980–987.

Kramling, T. E., & Singleton, V. E. (1969). An estimate of the nonflavonoid phenols in

wines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 20(2), 86–92.

Labbé, D., Tremblay, A., & Bazinet, L. (2006). Effect of brewing temperature and

duration on green tea catechin solubilization: Basis for production of EGC and
EGCG-enriched fractions. Separation and Purification Technology, 49, 1–9.

Lachman, J., Hosnedl, V., Pivec, V., & Orsák, M. (1998). Polyphenols in cereals

and their positive and negative role in human and animal nutrition. In
Proceedings of conference cereals for human health and preventive nutrition (pp.
118–125). Brno.

Langley-Evans, S. C. (2000). Consumption of black tea elicits an increase in plasma

antioxidant potential in humans. International Journal of Food Sciences and
Nutrition, 51(5), 309–315.

Lemanska, K., Szymusiak, B., Tyrakowska, B., Zielinski, R., Soffers, A. E. M. F., &

Rietjens, I. M. C. M. (2001). The influence of pH on antioxidant properties and
the mechanism of antioxidant action of hydroxyflavones. Free Radical Biology
and Medicine, 31(7), 869–881.

Li, Y.-H., Gu, W., & Ye, S. (2007). Expression and location of caffeine synthase in tea

plants. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 54(5), 698–701.

Lin, Y. S., Wu, S. S., & Lin, J. K. (2003). Determination of tea polyphenols and caffeine

in tea flowers (Camellia sinensis) and their hydroxyl radical scavenging and
nitric oxide suppressing effects. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51,
975–980.

Majchrzak, D., Mitter, S., & Elmadfa, I. (2004). The effect of ascorbic acid on total

antioxidant activity of black and green teas. Food Chemistry, 88, 447–451.

Nawrot, P., Jordan, S., Eastwood, J., Rotstein, J., Hugenholtz, A., & Feeley, M. (2003).

Effects of caffeine on human health. Food Additives and Contaminants, 20(1),
1–30.

Nicoli, M. C., Anese, M., Parpinel, M., Franceschi, S., & Lerici, C. R. (1997). Loss and/or

formation of antioxidants during food processing and storage. Cancer Letters,
114, 71–74.

Perva-Uzunalic´, A., Škerget, M., Knez, Zˇ., Weinreich, B., Otto, F., & Grüner, S. (2006).

Extraction of active ingredients from green tea (Camellia sinensis): Extraction
efficiency of major catechins and caffeine. Food Chemistry, 96(4), 597–605.

Pinelo, M., Manzocco, L., Núnˇez, M. J., & Nicoli, M. C. (2004). Interaction among

phenols in food fortification: Negative synergism on antioxidant capacity.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52, 1177–1180.

Price, W. E., & Spitzer, J. C. (1993). Variation in the amounts of individual flavanols

in a range of green teas. Food Chemistry, 47, 271–276.

Re, R., Pellegrini, N., Proteggente, A., Pannala, A., Yang, M., & Rice-Evans, C. (1999).

Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolourisation
assay. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 26, 1231–1237.

Reto, M., Figueira, M. E., Filipe, M. F., & Almeida, C. M. M. (2007). Chemical

composition of green tea (Camellia sinensis) infusions commercialized in
Portugal. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 62, 139–144.

Rice Evans, C. A., Miller, N. J., & Paganga, G. (1996). Structure–antioxidant activity

relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Radical Biology and Medicine,
20, 933–956.

Rusak, G., Komes, D., Likic´, S., Horzˇic´, D., & Kovacˇ, M. (2008). Phenolic content and

antioxidative capacity of green and white tea extracts depending on extraction
conditions and the solvent used. Food Chemistry, 110, 852–858.

Scharbert, S., Holzmann, N., & Hofmann, T. (2004). Identification of the astringent

taste compounds in black tea infusions by combining instrumental analysis and
human bioresponse. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52, 3498–3508.

Sharma, V., Gulati, A., & Ravindranath, S. D. (2005). Extractability of tea catechins as

a function of manufacture procedure and temperature of infusion. Food
Chemistry, 93, 141–148.

Toschi, T. G., Bordoni, A., Hrelia, S., Bendini, A., Lercker, G., & Biagi, P. L. (2000). The

protective role of different green tea extracts after oxidative damage is related
to their catechin composition. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48(9),
3973–3978.

Van der Berg, R., Haenen, G. R. M. M., Van der Berg, H., & Bast, A. (1999).

Applicability of an improved Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC)
assay for evaluation of antioxidant capacity measurements of mixtures. Food
Chemistry, 66, 511–517.

Vinson, J. A., & Dabbagh, Y. A. (1998). Tea phenols: Antioxidant effectiveness of teas,

tea components, tea fractions and their binding with lipoproteins. Nutrition
Research, 18(6), 1067–1075.

Wang, H., Helliwell, K., & You, X. (2000). Isocratic elution for the determination of

catechins, caffeine and gallic acid in green tea using HPLC. Food Chemistry, 68,
115–121.

Yamamoto, T., Juneja, L. R., Chu, D. C., & Kim, M. (1997). Chemistry and applications of

green tea. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press, LLC.

176

D. Komes et al. / Food Research International 43 (2010) 167–176


Document Outline


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
Ania z Zielonego Wzgorza id 648 Nieznany (2)
GWJW zielona r2b id 198152 Nieznany
Dwa razy zielony id 144536 Nieznany
Herbaty przeciwutleniacze id 20 Nieznany
analogi dla ZIELONEGO id 62089 Nieznany
Abolicja podatkowa id 50334 Nieznany (2)
4 LIDER MENEDZER id 37733 Nieznany (2)
katechezy MB id 233498 Nieznany
metro sciaga id 296943 Nieznany
perf id 354744 Nieznany
interbase id 92028 Nieznany
Mbaku id 289860 Nieznany
Probiotyki antybiotyki id 66316 Nieznany
miedziowanie cz 2 id 113259 Nieznany
LTC1729 id 273494 Nieznany
D11B7AOver0400 id 130434 Nieznany
analiza ryzyka bio id 61320 Nieznany
pedagogika ogolna id 353595 Nieznany

więcej podobnych podstron