Childhood Maltreatment and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation: Associations with

Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction among Young Adult Women

Alessandra H. Rellini

Department of Psychology, University of Vermont

Anka A. Vujanovic

National Center for PTSD–Behavioral Science Division, VA Boston Healthcare System,

Boston University School of Medicine

Myani Gilbert and Michael J. Zvolensky

Department of Psychology, University of Vermont

This study examined relations among childhood maltreatment, difficulties in emotion
regulation, and sexual and relationship satisfaction among young adult women reporting
current involvement in committed, romantic relationships. A sample of 192 women (ages
18–25) completed self-report questionnaires as part of an Internet-based survey. It was
hypothesized that severity of childhood maltreatment and difficulties in emotion regulation
would each independently and negatively predict (a) sexual satisfaction, (b) relationship
intimacy, and (c) expression of affection within the context of the relationship. Furthermore,
it was hypothesized that greater emotion regulation difficulties would moderate the effects of
childhood maltreatment on these sexual and relationship variables (i.e., sexual satisfaction,
relationship intimacy, and expression of affection). Findings suggest that difficulties in emo-
tion regulation demonstrated an incremental effect with regard to sexual satisfaction, but not
with intimacy and affection expression. In contrast to predictions, no significant interactive
effects were documented. Clinical implications and future directions related to this line of
inquiry are discussed.

There is a high prevalence of relational and sexual
problems among adult women exposed to childhood
maltreatment, defined as childhood sexual abuse,
physical abuse, or neglect (Davis, Petretic-Jackson, &
Ting, 2001; Fromuth, 1986; Loeb et al., 2002; Meston,
Heiman, Trapnell, & Carlin, 1999; Rellini & Meston,
2007; Scholerdt & Heiman, 2003). The most commonly
reported sexual and relationship problems for women
with a history of childhood maltreatment include
inhibited sexual desire, lower levels of sexual satisfac-
tion, difficulties becoming sexually aroused or reaching
orgasm, difficulties developing emotional intimacy with
a partner, and interpersonal aggression (DeSilva, 2001;
Lewis et al., 2010; Rellini & Meston, 2007).

As not all individuals with a history of childhood

maltreatment report sexual or relational problems in
adulthood (Leonard & Follette, 2002; Loeb et al.,
2002; Rellini & Meston, 2007), increasing our under-
standing

of

malleable

(changeable)

vulnerabilities

remains a fecund area of intellectual and clinical pursuit.
There is increasing evidence that emotion regulation
offers promise for advancing our understanding of
potential risk and maintenance factors for sexual and
relational problems (Rellini, Vujanovic, & Zvolensky,
2010). Emotion regulation is a promising construct in
this context; it encapsulates an individual’s understand-
ing and regulation of emotional responses (Cole,
Michel, & Teti, 1994; Mennin, 2004; Salovey, Mayer,
Goldman, Turvey, & Palfai, 1995). Gratz and Roemer
(2004) developed an empirically grounded assessment
instrument entitled the Difficulties in Emotion Regula-
tion

Scale

(DERS),

which

measures

emotional

regulation from a multidimensional framework. The
DERS assesses several facets of emotion regulation,
including difficulties relevant to an individual’s (a)
acceptance of emotional responses, (b) ability to engage

This research was supported by the McNeil Prevention and

Community Psychology Fund and the Undergraduate Research
Endeavour Competitive Award. The views expressed here are those
of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Depart-
ment of Veterans Affairs or the McNeil Fund. We thank Sarah P.
Roberts for her substantial contribution with data collection.

Correspondence should be addressed to Alessandra H. Rellini,

Department of Psychology, University of Vermont, John Dewey Hall,
2 Colchester Ave., Burlington, VT 05405. E-mail: [e-mail]

JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 49(5), 434–442, 2012
Copyright # The Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality
ISSN: 0022-4499 print=1559-8519 online
DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2011.565430

in goal-directed behavior under distress, (c) ability to
control impulsive behaviors when distressed, (d) aware-
ness of emotional experiences, (e) access to emotion
regulation strategies, and (f) emotional clarity.

It has been theorized that emotion regulation difficul-

ties are the product of the interaction between biological
vulnerabilities and environmental factors (Linehan,
1993; Thompson, 1994). As part of the environmental fac-
tors, an invalidating, abusive, or neglectful childhood
environment wherein children do not learn adaptive ways
of coping with aversive emotions has been hypothesized
as a risk factor for the development of emotion dysregula-
tion (Linehan, 1993). Such emotion regulatory difficulties
may be formed and=or maintained via social learning
contexts and relationships in adolescence and early adult-
hood (Kim, Pears, Capaldi, & Owen, 2009). It is possible
that greater levels of emotion regulation difficulties may
exacerbate the effects of childhood maltreatment on sex-
ual and relationship problems in adulthood (Rellini,
2008). For example, women with histories of child mal-
treatment may be more likely to manifest sexual and
relationship problems if they also experience high levels
of difficulties regulating emotions. In contrast, emotion
regulation skills may decrease the negative effects of child-
hood maltreatment in terms of sexual and relationship
problems (e.g., Rellini et al., 2010).

There is a dearth of empirical literature devoted to

the examination of associations between emotion regu-
lation and sexual and relationship functioning. In the
only published empirical study to date, Rellini and
colleagues (2010) documented significant (negative)
incremental associations between emotion regulation
difficulties, as indexed by the DERS, and sexual satis-
faction, even after controlling for theoretically relevant
variables (i.e., posttraumatic stress symptom severity,
negative affectivity, anxiety sensitivity, and daily ciga-
rette consumption). This investigation relied on a
relatively small sample of 43 men and women, with a
history of varied types of trauma exposure. The sample
also was limited in that it focused exclusively on smo-
kers. There is a need to replicate and extend such work
to a more diverse population in a number of specific
ways. First, it is important to replicate the previously
documented findings among larger samples of indivi-
duals who are currently engaged in committed roman-
tic relationships independently from their smoking
behavior, so as to increase the generalizability of
results and improve accuracy of relationship function-
ing reports. Second, since men and women have been
shown to manifest unique sexual and relationship func-
tioning problems (Lewis et al., 2010; Parish et al.,
2007), it is important to examine these relations using
a gender-specific within-subjects design so as to attain
a clearer understanding of variables among men and
women, independently. Third, Rellini et al. (2010)
documented varied types of trauma exposure among
participants, thus impeding specific interpretations of

the effects of certain types of trauma (e.g., childhood
maltreatment).

Together, this investigation sought to replicate and

extend extant findings among a sample of young adult
women, currently involved in committed romantic rela-
tionships and reporting varying degrees of childhood
maltreatment. First, it was hypothesized that childhood
maltreatment and difficulties in emotion regulation
would be significantly (negatively) correlated with sexual
and relationship satisfaction. Second, it was hypothe-
sized that severity of childhood maltreatment and diffi-
culties in emotion regulation would each incrementally
(independently) and negatively predict (a) sexual satis-
faction, (b) relationship intimacy, and (c) expression of
affection within the context of the relationship over
and above the variance accounted for by age and
relationship duration. Third, it was hypothesized that
greater emotion regulation difficulties would interact
with the effects of childhood maltreatment on these sex-
ual and relationship variables (i.e., sexual satisfaction,
relationship intimacy, and expression of affection). This
prediction was driven by the perspective that childhood
maltreatment may, theoretically, have the most deleteri-
ous interpersonal effects when co-occurring with greater
difficulties in regulating emotional states.

Method

Participants

Participants were 192 young adult women (M

age

¼

21.8, SD

¼ 3.7; observed range ¼ 18–25), recruited from

online advertisements posted on social networking
websites (see the Procedure section for details). Parti-
cipants were included in the study if they self-identified
as (a) female, (b) between the ages of 18 and 25, (c)
non-virgin, (d) U.S. citizen, and (e) English speaking. A
total of 596 women completed the online screener between
June and October 2009, and 218 qualified and enrolled in
the study and started questionnaire completion. A total of
192 women completed all questionnaires. Therefore,
analyses were based on 88% (N

¼ 192) of the women

who qualified for the study. No statistically significant
group differences were evident between women who com-
pleted the study and women who completed only the first
demographics questions (n

¼ 26) in terms of age, edu-

cation level, sexual orientation, relationship length, stu-
dent status, or race and ethnicity.

As illustrated in Table 1, participants were predomi-

nantly Caucasian women (90%), who had completed at
least some college (89%). Based on the Kinsey scale
(Kinsey, Pomeroy, & Martin, 1948), the sample reported
large variability in terms of sexual orientation, with
approximately 26% not identifying as exclusively or pre-
dominantly heterosexual. With regard to relationship
status at the time of the study, approximately 60%

EMOTION DYSREGULATION AND SEXUALITY

435

(n

¼ 116) of participants reported being involved in a

committed relationship or married, whereas the remain-
ing 41% (n

¼ 79) of participants reported either dating

one partner or being in a relationship that was not com-
mitted. A small minority of participants (9%; n

¼ 17)

reported being in a relationship with a woman. The mean
relationship length reported was 3.7 years (SD

¼ 2.3).

One hundred-three participants (54%) reported at least

one type of childhood maltreatment, and 10 (5%) scored
above the normative cutoff for all five types of childhood
maltreatment (i.e., emotional neglect, physical neglect,
emotional abuse, physical abuse, and sexual abuse), as
measured by the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire
(CTQ; see the Measures section for details; Bernstein,
Fink, Handelsman, & Foote, 1994). Twenty-four parti-
cipants (13%) scored above the normative cutoff for sex-
ual abuse. Table 2 illustrates more details on frequency of
childhood maltreatment in the sample. Co-occurrence of
types of abuse was common, with only eight participants
(4%) meeting criteria exclusively for sexual abuse, six
participants (3.1%) meeting criteria exclusively for physi-
cal abuse, and none meeting criteria exclusively for
emotional abuse or emotional neglect.

Measures

Demographics.

Questions about age, education (i.e.,

high school graduate or less vs. some college or more),
student status (i.e., currently a student: yes or no), and
ethnicity (i.e., African American or Black, Hispanic or
Latin American, Asian or Asian American, Native
Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska
Native, Euro-American or White, multiracial, and
‘‘other’’) were asked to characterize the sample. Addition-
ally, household income was measured separately for
people self-identifying as dependent or non-dependent
for tax purposes. Finally, the Kinsey scale (Kinsey et al.,
1948) was used to assess sexual orientation. This is a
seven-point (0–6) Likert scale that conceptualizes sexual
orientation as ranging continuously from exclusively
heterosexual (0) to exclusively homosexual (6). Relation-
ship characteristics measured in the study include
relationship status (dating, in a non-committed rela-
tionship, or married=committed relationship), length of
relationship (months), and partner’s gender.

Table 2.

Childhood Maltreatment Scores

Trauma Type

M

SD

Minimum–Maximum

Cutoff

n > cutoff; n (%)

a

CTQ-total

40.5

15.6

25–96

—

—

Emotional neglect

9.9

4.5

5–25

15

21 (10.9)

Emotional abuse

10.0

4.8

5–24

10

51 (26.6)

Physical neglect

6.7

2.7

5–19

8

27 (14.1)

Physical abuse

7.2

3.7

5–23

8

27 (14.1)

Sexual abuse

7.0

4.7

5–25

8

24 (12.5)

Note. CTQ

¼ Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (Bernstein, Fink, Handelsman, & Foote, 1994).

a

Cutoff based on specificity and sensitivity scores (Walker et al., 1999).

Table 1.

Demographic and Relationship Characteristics for

All Participants in the Sample

Variable

n

%

Education

High school graduate or less

25

13.0

Some college or more

171

89.0

Currently a student

Yes

102

53.1

Ethnicity

African American or Black

6

3.1

Hispanic or Latin American

11

5.7

Asian or Asian American

7

3.6

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

1

0.5

American Indian or Alaska Native

5

2.6

Euro-American or White

173

90.1

Multiracial

11

5.7

Other

3

1.5

Sexual orientation (Kinsey scale)

0

93

48.4

1

49

25.5

2

20

10.4

3

10

5.2

4

6

3.1

5

5

2.6

6

6

3.1

Other

7

3.6

Relationship status

Single=dating

79

41.1

Married=committed relationship

116

60.4

Length of current relationship

0–6 months

45

23.4

6–12 months

30

15.6

1–2 years

31

16.1

3–5 years

39

20.3

5–10 years

6

3.1

Gender of current partner

Male

151

78.6

Female

17

8.9

M

SD

Relationship length (years)

3.7

2.3

Annual income=year for non-dependent

a

$34,700

$21,600

Family income=year for dependent or student

b

$105,000

$83,700

a

Participants self-identified as non-students and non-dependent based

on taxes filed the previous year.

b

Participants self-identified as either full-time students or dependent

based on taxes filed the previous year.

RELLINI, VUJANOVIC, GILBERT, AND ZVOLENSKY

436

CTQ (Bernstein et al., 1994).

The CTQ is a 28-item

self-report measure on which respondents indicate,
using a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never
true) to 5 (very often true), their childhood experiences
of maltreatment—a construct indexed along five domains:
(a) Emotional Abuse, (b) Physical Abuse, (c) Sexual
Abuse, (d) Physical Neglect, and (e) Emotional Neglect
(Bernstein et al., 1994). The test–retest reliability of the
CTQ, over a two- to six-month period, has ranged from
r

¼ .79 to r ¼ .95; and convergent and discriminant val-

idity was determined to be adequate (Bernstein et al.,
1994). Overall internal consistency of the entire measure
was high (a

¼ .91; Scher, Stein, Asmundson, McCreary,

& Forder, 2001). A cutoff for each domain was used based
on findings from Walker et al. (1999), indicating that a
score of 8 for Physical Abuse, Physical Neglect, and Sex-
ual Abuse; a score of 10 for Emotional Abuse; and a score
of 15 for Emotional Neglect were sensitive and specific
scores to accurately identify individuals with these specific
types of abuse as assessed by experts in the field of trauma
(Walker et al., 1999). These cutoffs were utilized for a
description of the childhood maltreatment reported by
the sample. The continuous measure for severity of abuse
(CTQ) was the main variable in the analyses. In this study,
internal consistency was a

¼ .88, a ¼ .95, and a ¼ .90 for

Physical, Sexual, and Emotional Abuse, respectively;
and a

¼ .87 and a ¼ .77 for Emotional and Physical

Neglect, respectively. Consistent with past work (Rellini
et al., 2010), the CTQ-total score (logarithmic transform-
ation) was utilized as a measure of childhood maltreat-
ment severity in the analyses.

DERS (Gratz & Roemer, 2004).

The DERS is a

36-item self-report measure on which respondents indi-
cate, on a five-point Likert-style scale ranging from 1
(almost never) to 5 (almost always), how often each item
applies to them (Gratz & Roemer, 2004). The DERS is
multidimensional in that it is comprised of 6 factors in
addition to a total score. These factors include (a) Non-
acceptance of Emotional Responses, (b) Difficulties
Engaging in Goal-Directed Behavior, (c) Impulse Con-
trol Difficulties, (d) Lack of Emotional Awareness
(Aware), (e) Limited Access to Emotion Regulation Stra-
tegies, and (f) Lack of Emotional Clarity (Clarity). The
DERS has high levels of internal inconsistency (a

¼ .93;

Gratz & Roemer, 2004) and adequate test–retest
reliability over a four- to eight-week period (r

¼ .88;

Gratz & Roemer, 2004). The DERS-total sum score
represents a global emotional dysregulation composite
(Gratz & Roemer, 2004), and, in this study, it showed
adequate internal consistency (Cronbach’s a

¼ .89).

Sexual Satisfaction Scale (SSS; Meston & Trapnell,

2005).

The SSS is a 30-item questionnaire that measures,

on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly
disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), five separate domains of sex-
ual satisfaction: (a) ease and comfort discussing sexual and

emotional issues (Communication); (b) compatibility
between partners in terms of sexual beliefs, preferences,
desires, and attraction (Compatibility); (c) contentment
with emotional and sexual aspects of the relationship (Con-
tentment), (d) personal distress concerning sexual prob-
lems (Personal Distress); and (e) distress regarding the
impact of sexual problems on partners and relationships
at large (Relational Distress). The five domains have
shown

acceptable

internal

consistency

(Cronbach’s

a

.74) and test–retest reliability after four to five weeks

(r

¼ .5879). The SSS reliably differentiated between

women with and without sexual dysfunction on each of
the domains and total scores (Meston & Trapnell, 2005).
In this study, Cronbach’s alpha for the total score was .80.

Network of Relationships Inventory: Social Provisions

Version–Revised (NRI–SPV–R; Furman & Buhrmester,
2009).

This version of the NRI–SPV–R comprises 36

items on which respondents indicated, using a five-point
Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (little or none) to 5 (the
most), their levels of relationship satisfaction as indexed
by 10 factors (Furman & Buhrmester, 2009). Based on
research suggesting that the association between sexual
function and emotion regulation may be mediated by dif-
ficulties in developing emotional connections with part-
ners (Fruzzetti & Iverson, 2004; Linehan, 1993; Rellini
et al., 2010), only the Intimacy and Affection factors were
considered for this study. The Intimacy factor was com-
prised of items relevant to how much the person shares
with her partner (e.g., ‘‘How much do you share your
secrets and private feelings with this romantic partner?’’).
The Affection factor included items related to how much
the person feels loved by her partner (e.g., ‘‘How much
does this romantic partner have a strong feeling of affec-
tion [loving or liking] toward you?’’). This scale can be
used to assess the quality of a romantic relationship.
The scale has shown high internal consistency for the
domains of Intimacy (a

¼ .86) and affection (a ¼ .91) with

romantic partners (Furman & Buhrmester, 2009). In this
investigation, internal consistency was similarly high,
with a

¼ .89 for Intimacy and a ¼ .95 for Affection.

Procedure

Participants were recruited using online advertise-

ments posted on social networking websites, such as
Facebook.com

1

, Craigslist.org, and Backpage.com

1

,

indicating that (a) the online study was about sexual
health, and (b) people who completed the study would
be entered in a raffle to win $100 (with a 1 in 30 chance
of winning). An online site, PsychData

1

, was used for

anonymous and confidential collection of data from
recruited participants. Prior to beginning the online sur-
vey, interested individuals read a short explanation of
the study and clicked on a link leading to an online
screener. This eligibility screener assessed for age, gender
identity, virginity status, citizenship and language

EMOTION DYSREGULATION AND SEXUALITY

437

fluency. After completing the online screener, parti-
cipants received a more in-depth description of the study
and were informed that the questionnaires would take
between 30 and 45 min to complete. Participants were
not permitted to stop data entry and continue at a later
time. At the conclusion of the study, participants
received a random participation identification code that
they were asked to send to the researcher to be entered
into the monetary raffle for possible compensation.

Data Analytic Plan

First, zero-order correlations were computed to evaluate

associations

among

theoretically

relevant

variables.

Second, a series of three-step hierarchical regressions were
conducted to assess the main and interactive effects of child-
hood trauma severity (CTQ-total) and difficulties in emo-
tion regulation (DERS-total) with regard to the following
criterion variables: (a) sexual satisfaction (SSS), (b)
relationship intimacy satisfaction (NRI–SPV–R Intimacy
subscale), and (c) relationship affection satisfaction
(NRI–SPV–R Affection subscale). Age and relationship
duration were entered as covariates at Step 1 of the
regression models in an effort to account for developmental
differences in the sample, the main effects of childhood
trauma severity (CTQ-total) and difficulties in emotion
regulation (DERS-total) were entered at Step 2, and the
interactive effect of childhood trauma severity by difficult-
ies in emotion regulation (CTQ

DERS-total) was entered

at Step 3. DERS-total and CTQ-total were mean-centered.
Since CTQ scores were skewed, logarithmic transforma-
tions were applied before mean centering.

Results

Correlations between Emotion Dysregulation,
Relationship Variables, and Childhood Trauma

Table 3 presents a summary of zero-order correlations

and descriptive data for theoretically relevant variables.

Age and relationship length were not significantly
correlated with the DERS subscales or the CTQ-total
score; however, they were significantly correlated with
the dependent variables used in the subsequent analy-
ses: SSS, NRI–SPV–R Affection, and NRI–SPV–R
Intimacy. Overall, both age and relationship length were
negatively correlated with SSS (r

¼ .18 and .27,

respectively) and NRI–SPV–R Affection (r

¼ .26 and

.21, respectively). Age was significantly and negatively
correlated with NRI–SPV–R Intimacy (r

¼ .17). These

results indicate that older participants reported less sex-
ual satisfaction, less affection, and less intimacy, while
individuals reporting a longer relationship scored lower
in sexual satisfaction and affection.

As illustrated in Table 3, CTQ-total was signifi-

cantly and negatively associated with SSS, r

¼ .18,

p < .05; but not NRI–SPV–R Intimacy and NRI–
SPV–R Affection, suggesting that individuals reporting
more severe forms of maltreatment reported lower
sexual satisfaction. Also, CTQ-total was significantly
and positively associated with DERS-total (r

¼ .28,

p < .01),

as

well

as

all

DERS

subscales

(range

r

¼ .1527, p < .05), with the exception of DERS-

Aware and DERS-Clarity (ps > .05). These findings
indicate that individuals with more severe forms of
childhood maltreatment reported more difficulties in
emotion regulation.

Consistent with our hypotheses of greater sexual

and relationship difficulties for individuals who have
more emotion dysregulation, DERS-total was signifi-
cantly and negatively associated with SSS (r

¼ .29,

p < .01). Yet, in contrast to predictions, DERS-total
was not significantly associated with the NRI–SPV–R
Intimacy or Affection. DERS-Aware and DERS-
Clarity subfactors demonstrated significant correlations
with SSS (r

¼ .22 and .36, respectively; p < .01),

NRI–SPV–R Intimacy (r

¼ .21 and .29; respectively,

p < .01), and NRI–SPV–R Affection (r

¼ .19 and

.25, p < .01).

Table 3.

Zero-Order Correlations and Descriptive Characteristics for All Targeted Variables

Variable

CTQ-Total

Age

Relationship Length

SSS

Intimacy

Affection

M (SD)

DERS-Non-acceptance

.26

.09

.20

.02

.03

14.2 (5.8)

DERS-Goals

.15

.11

.03

.13

.06

15.3 (4.8)

DERS-Impulse

.27

.07

.17

.07

.09

12.4 (5.2)

DERS-Aware

.08

02

.22

.21

.19

13.4 (4.6)

DERS-Strategies

.22

.11

25

.01

05

18.7 (7.0)

DERS-Clarity

.10

.05

.36

.29

.25

11.1 (3.8)

DERS-total

.28

.10

.29

.07

.13

85.0 (22.2)

CTQ-total

—

<

.01

.18

.12

.07

1.58 (0.15)

Age

<

.01

—

.18

.17

.26

21.7 (3.3)

Relationship length

.05

.15

.27

.13

.21

3.7 (2.3)

M

1.58

21.7

3.7

89.3

11.3

12.4

—

SD

0.15

3.3

2.3

19.9

3.3

3.1

Note. Intimacy and affection are subscales of the Network of Relationships Inventory: Social Provisions Version–Revised. CTQ-total is log
transformed. CTQ

¼ Childhood Trauma Questionnaire; SSS ¼ Sexual Satisfaction Scale; DERS ¼ Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale.

p < .05.

p < .01.

RELLINI, VUJANOVIC, GILBERT, AND ZVOLENSKY

438

Childhood Trauma and Emotion Dysregulation
Predicting Sexual Satisfaction and Relationship
Variables

Table 4 illustrates the results for the hierarchical

regressions.

Sexual satisfaction (SSS).

Step 1 accounted for a

statistically significant 10% of variance, F(2, 159)

¼

8.81, p < .001; both age (b

¼ .20, p < .05) and relation-

ship length (b

¼ .25, p < .01) were significant predic-

tors. Step 2 of the model contributed 9% of unique

variance, DF(2, 157)

¼ 8.20, p < .001. In partial support

of our hypotheses that both emotion dysregulation
and childhood trauma would independently contribute
to sexual satisfaction, DERS-total, but not CTQ-total,
emerged as a significant incremental predictor in Step
2 (b

¼ .27, p < .01). Finally, inconsistent with our pre-

diction,

the

interactive

effect

of

CTQ-total

DERS-total, entered at Step 3 of the model—DF(1,
156)

¼ 1.03—was not a significant predictor of sexual

satisfaction.

Table 4.

Regression Statistics for Sexual Satisfaction, Relationship Intimacy, and Affection Regressed on Age, Severity of Childhood

Maltreatment (CTQ), Difficulties in Regulating Emotions (DERS), and the Interaction Between CTQ and DERS

Criterion Variable

DF

DR

2

b

t

p

s-r

2

Sexual satisfaction (SSS)
Step 1

8.81

0.10

Age

0.20

2.59

.010

.04

Relationship length

0.25

3.24

.001

.06

Step 2

8.20

0.09

Age

0.16

2.23

.027

.03

Relationship length

0.23

3.19

.002

.05

DERS-total

0.27

3.53

.001

.06

CTQ-total

0.07

0.94

.349

>

.01

Step 3

1.03

0.01

Age

0.15

2.10

.037

.02

Relationship length

0.24

3.28

.001

.06

DERS-total

0.99

1.07

.170

.01

CTQ-total

0.08

1.38

.286

.01

CTQ

DERS

0.73

1.01

.313

>

.01

Relationship intimacy
Step 1

3.76

0.04

Age

0.16

2.15

.033

Relationship length

0.10

1.30

.195

Step 2

2.02

0.02

Age

0.15

2.01

.046

.01

Relationship length

0.10

1.37

.172

.01

DERS-total

0.83

1.07

.285

>

.01

CTQ-total

0.15

1.94

.054

.02

Step 3

0.58

>

0.01

Age

0.14

1.85

.066

.02

Relationship length

0.11

1.41

.160

.01

DERS-total

0.64

0.87

.387

>

.01

CTQ-total

0.14

1.78

.078

.02

CTQ

DERS

0.57

0.76

.449

>

.01

Relationship affection
Step 1

10.34

.10

Age

0.25

3.53

.001

.01

Relationship length

0.16

2.28

.024

>

.01

Step 2

1.93

.02

Age

0.24

3.35

.001

.01

Relationship length

0.17

2.30

.023

<

.01

DERS-total

0.12

1.59

.115

.02

CTQ-total

0.12

1.59

.113

.08

Step 3

1.95

.01

Age

0.23

3.13

.002

.01

Relationship length

0.17

2.35

.020

>

.01

DERS-total

0.78

1.09

.279

.01

CTQ-total

0.11

1.40

.163

.07

CTQ

DERS

0.67

0.93

.356

.01

Note. Intimacy and Affection are subscales of the Network of Relationships Inventory: Social Provisions Version–Revised. CTQ

¼ Childhood

Trauma Questionnaire; DERS

¼ Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; s-r ¼semi-partial coefficient; SSS ¼ Sexual Satisfaction Scale.

p < .05.

p < .001.

EMOTION DYSREGULATION AND SEXUALITY

439

Relationship intimacy (NRI–SPV–R).

Step 1 of the

model was statistically significant, F(2, 178)

¼ 3.67,

p < .05, indicating that age and relationship length
explained 4% of the variance in Intimacy. Step 2 pre-
dicted a nonsignificant 3% of the variance in NRI–
SPV–R Intimacy. Inconsistent with prediction, Step 3
did not provide a significant interactive effect for
NRI–SPV–R Intimacy.

Relationship affection (NRI–SPV–R).

Step 1 of the

model was statistically significant, F(2, 178)

¼ 10.34,

p < .001. Inconsistent with prediction, Steps 2 and 3 were
not significant, DF(2, 176)

¼ 1.93 and 1.95, respectively.

Discussion

Results were partially consistent with the hypotheses.

First, severity of childhood maltreatment was negatively
associated with sexual and relationship satisfaction,
further corroborating the well-documented array of
interpersonal difficulties experienced by adult women
exposed to neglectful and abusive childhood environ-
ments (Davis & Petretic-Jackson, 2000; DiLillo, 2001;
Testa, VanZile-Tamsen, & Livingston, 2005). Moreover,
severity of childhood maltreatment was positively corre-
lated with emotion regulation difficulties—a finding in
line with the theory that tumultuous social environments
may affect the ability of children to learn coping
mechanisms to regulate internal emotional states (Kim
et al., 2009; Linehan, 1993).

In agreement with a previous study (Rellini et al.,

2010), greater levels of difficulties in emotion regulation
were incrementally, negatively correlated with sexual
satisfaction. Specifically, difficulties in emotion regu-
lation independently contributed to the prediction of
variance in sexual satisfaction in the context of age,
relationship length, and childhood maltreatment sever-
ity. This result highlights the unique explanatory role
of emotion dysregulation on sexual satisfaction above
and beyond the effects of childhood maltreatment. In
fact, the effect size of the association between sexual
satisfaction and difficulties in emotion regulation (s-r

2

¼

.06) was stronger than that observed between sexual
satisfaction and childhood maltreatment (s-r

2

<

.01).

These findings, which replicate and extend past work
on the relations of emotion regulation with childhood
maltreatment (Kim & Cicchetti, 2010) and with sexual
satisfaction (Rellini et al., 2010), suggest that difficulties
in emotion regulation offer unique explanatory value
for better understanding sexual satisfaction among
women with varying degrees of childhood maltreat-
ment. Based on these findings, prospective tests of the
role of emotional regulation in regard to sexual satisfac-
tion represent an important next step in this line of
inquiry.

Inconsistent with expectations, difficulties in emotion

regulation did not significantly predict relationship inti-
macy or affection satisfaction. Thus, emotion regulation
may offer explanatory value for some, but not all,
aspects of relationship processes among young adult
women with a history of maltreatment. Childhood
maltreatment severity also demonstrated positive corre-
lations, but relatively minimal, concurrent predictive
power in regard to affection and intimacy among this
sample. This finding, in particular, was unexpected given
that previous studies have documented that adults
exposed to childhood sexual abuse tend to develop
difficulties in developing and maintaining functional
intimate relationships (Beitchman et al., 1992; Browne
& Finkelhor, 1996; Carson, Gertz, Donaldson, &
Wonderlich, 1990; Testa et al., 2005). The different find-
ings may be the product, in part, of the measurement of
affection and intimacy satisfaction utilized in this study.
Namely, the NRI–SPV–R asks participants to indicate
how much they were likely to talk about secrets and per-
sonal matters with partners (intimacy) and how much
they felt loved and cared for by their partners (affec-
tion). These operational definitions of intimacy and
affection may not be fully comprehensive and may
thereby only capture aspects of intimacy that are not
salient to trauma survivors (i.e., disclosing secrets),
and overlook other important aspects. Alternatively, it
is possible that the lack of a significant association
between childhood maltreatment and intimacy or affec-
tion satisfaction may be partially due to the utilization
of a measure of childhood physical, emotional, and sex-
ual abuse, as compared to a focus on sexual abuse sever-
ity alone, as it was assessed in the previous study (Testa
et al., 2005). Finally, intimacy may simply not be an
aspect of relationship functioning that is associated with
childhood maltreatment. For example, an individual
exposed to childhood maltreatment may have learned
to share secrets and personal information with others
but may not know how to assert his or her needs with
a partner. As a result, there may be utility in exploring
related, but distinct, constructs (e.g., trust, sense of
worth) in future work with trauma-exposed persons.

Also, contrary to our prediction, there was no empiri-

cal evidence of an interactive effect between difficulties
in emotion regulation and childhood maltreatment
severity for any of the criterion variables. Thus, there
was no evidence of systematic interplay between these
two constructs in terms of the studied criterion variables
among this trauma-exposed sample of women. As sexual
and relationship satisfaction are likely influenced by
numerous factors (Christopher & Sprecher, 2000;
Wishman & Uebelacker, 2007), a more concerted effort
may usefully be applied to exploring other types of
interactive processes in future studies.

Although not the primary aim of this study, inspec-

tion

of

the

zero-order

correlations

indicated

an

interesting set of findings. Specifically, low emotional

RELLINI, VUJANOVIC, GILBERT, AND ZVOLENSKY

440

clarity was negatively associated with sexual satisfac-
tion, as well as affection and intimacy satisfaction, sug-
gesting that clarity of emotional responses is an
important aspect of sexual and relational satisfaction.
One way to interpret these findings is that understanding
one’s emotions is an essential aspect of communication
and, to the extent that clarity of communication plays
an important role in both sexual and relationship satis-
faction (Kelly, Strassberg, & Turner, 2006; MacNeil &
Byers, 2009; Wheeless, Wheeless, & Baus, 1984), then
clarity of emotions becomes important for both sexual
and relationship satisfaction. Somewhat surprisingly,
higher impulsivity was positively correlated with inti-
macy, indicating that women who were more impulsive
tended to share more personal and intimate information
with their partners. Of course, it is not clear whether all
forms and types of intimacy are equally healthy in a
relationship and, specifically, if sharing information
because of impulsivity is any healthier for a relationship
than maintaining some boundaries in the type of sharing
that occurs between partners.

Severity of childhood maltreatment evidenced a

significant correlation with difficulties in emotion regu-
lation (r

¼ .28). This finding replicates and extends past

work, documenting associations between childhood vic-
timization and emotional dysregulation among adults
(e.g., Briere & Rickards, 2007). Furthermore, this find-
ing provides replication of past work, demonstrating
significant associations between posttraumatic stress,
generally, and difficulties regulating emotion (e.g.,
Lanius et al., 2003; Litz, Orsillo, Kaloupek, & Weathers,
2000). For example, Tull, Barrett, McMillan, and
Roemer (2007) found that posttraumatic stress symp-
tom severity was significantly associated with greater
difficulties in emotion regulation, specifically lack of
acceptance of emotional experiences, lack of clarity of
emotional responses, and limited emotion regulation
strategies. This is the first study to date, however, to
document associations between childhood maltreatment
severity and difficulties in emotion regulation.

This study has a number of interpretative caveats.

First, the sample was recruited through Internet
methods and may not be fully generalizable to other
populations recruited via alternative methods. Second,
causal interpretations of these results are not possible
due to the cross-sectional design and use of measures
that aggregate experiences. Third, method variance
may have contributed to the observed effects, as
self-report instruments were exclusively employed to
measure the constructs of interest. Fourth, as the
study aims were focused on ascertaining basic psycho-
logical processes associated with relationship quality
among a female population, we did not study a spe-
cific clinical population. Future research could extend
these findings in a meaningful way by studying parti-
cipants seeking treatment for relationship or sexual
problems.

In summary, the results of this study, in conjunction

with other recent evidence (Rellini et al., 2010), are
consistent with the view that individual differences in
emotion regulation may be relevant to better under-
standing sexual and relationship satisfaction. Research
is now needed to explore the stability of such findings
over time in order to determine the time course and
sequencing of change between the studied variables.

References

Beitchman, J. H., Zucker, K. J., Hood, J. E., DaCosta, G. A., Akman,

P. A., & Cassavia, E. (1992). A review of the long-term effects of
child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 101–118.

Bernstein, D. P., Fink, L., Handelsman, L., & Foote, J. (1994). Initial

reliability and validity of a new retrospective measure of child
abuse and neglect. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151,
1132–1136.

Briere, J., & Rickards, S. (2007). Self-awareness, affect regulation, and

relatedness: Differential sequels of childhood versus adult victimi-
zation experiences. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195,
497–503.

Browne, A., & Finkelhor, D. (1996). Impact of child sexual abuse: A

review of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 66–77.

Carson, D. K., Gertz, L. M., Donaldson, M. A., & Wonderlich, S. A.

(1990). Family-of-origin characteristics and current family
relationships of female adult incest victims. Journal of Family
Violence, 5, 153–171.

Christopher, F. S., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Sexuality in marriage, dat-

ing, and other relationships: A decade review. Journal of Marriage
& the Family, 62, 999–1017.

Cole, P. M., Michel, M. K., & Teti, L. O. D. (1994). The development

of emotion regulation and dysregulation: A clinical perspective.
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,
59(23), 73–100.

Davis, J. L., & Petretic-Jackson, P. A. (2000). The impact of child sex-

ual abuse on adult interpersonal functioning: A review and syn-
thesis of the empirical literature. Aggression and Violent
Behavior, 5, 291–328.

Davis, J. L., Petretic-Jackson, P. A., & Ting, L. (2001). Intimacy

dysfunction and trauma symptomatology: Long-term correlates
of different types of child abuse. Journal of Traumatic Stress,
14, 63–79.

DeSilva, P. (2001). Impact of trauma on sexual functioning and sexual

relationships. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 16, 269–278.

DiLillo, D. (2001). Interpersonal functioning among women reporting

a history of childhood sexual abuse: Empirical findings and meth-
odological issues. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 553–576.

Fromuth, M. E. (1986). The relationships of childhood sexual abuse

with later psychological adjustment in a sample of college women.
Child Abuse and Neglect, 10, 5–15.

Fruzzetti, A. E., & Iverson, K. M. (2004). Couples dialectical behavior

therapy: An approach to both individual and relational distress.
Couples Research and Therapy, 10, 8–13.

Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (2009). The Network of Relationships

Inventory: Behavioral and systems version. International Journal
of Behavioral Development, 33, 470–478.

Gratz, K., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of

emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor
structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion
Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral
Assessment, 26, 41–54.

Kelly, M. P., Strassberg, D. S., & Turner, C. M. (2006). Behavioral

assessment of couples’ communication in female orgasmic
disorder. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 32, 81–95.

EMOTION DYSREGULATION AND SEXUALITY

441

Kim, J., & Cicchetti, D. (2010). Longitudinal pathways linking child

maltreatment, emotion regulation, peer relations, and psycho-
pathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51,
706–716.

Kim, H. K., Pears, K. C., Capaldi, D. M., & Owen, L. D. (2009).

Emotion dysregulation in the intergenerational transmission of
romantic relationship conflict. Family Psychology, 23, 585–595.

Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual

behavior in the human male. Oxford, England: Saunders.

Lanius, R. A., Williamson, P. C., Hopper, J., Densmore, M.,

Boksman, K., Gupta, M., et al. (2003). Recall of emotional states
in posttraumatic stress disorder: An fMRI investigation. Biologi-
cal Psychiatry, 53, 204–210.

Leonard, L. M., & Follette, V. M. (2002). Sexual functioning in

women reporting a history of child sexual abuse: Review of the
empirical literature and clinical implications. Annual Review of
Sex Research, 13, 346–388.

Lewis, R. W., Fugl-Meyer, K. S., Corona, G., Hayes, R. D., Laumann,

E. O., Moreira, E. D., et al. (2010). Definition=epidemiology=risk
factors for sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7,
1598–1607.

Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline

personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford.

Litz, B. T., Orsillo, S. M., Kaloupek, D., & Weathers, F. (2000).

Emotional processing in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal
of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 26–39.

Loeb, T. B., Williams, J. K., Carmona, J. V., Rivkin, I., Wyatt, G. E.,

Chin, D., et al. (2002). Child sexual abuse: Associations with the
sexual functioning of adolescents and adults. Annual Review of
Sex Research, 13, 307–345.

MacNeil, S., & Byers, E. S. (2009). Role of sexual self-disclosure in the

sexual satisfaction of long-term heterosexual couples. Journal of
Sex Research, 46, 3–14.

Mennin, D. S. (2004). Emotion regulation therapy for generalized

anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 11,
17–29.

Meston, C. M., Heiman, J. R., Trapnell, P. D., & Carlin, A. S. (1999).

Ethnicity, desirable responding, and self-reports of abuse: A com-
parison of European- and Asian-ancestry undergraduates. Journal
of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 139–144.

Meston, C. M., & Trapnell, P. D. (2005). Development and validation

of a five factor sexual satisfaction and distress scale: The Sexual
Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS–W). Journal of Sexual
Medicine, 2, 66–81.

Parish, W. L., Luo, Y., Stolzenberg, R., Laumann, E. O., Farrer, G., &

Pan, S. (2007). Sexual practices and sexual satisfaction: A
population based study of Chinese urban adults. Archives of
Sexual Behavior, 36, 5–20.

Rellini, A. H. (2008). Review of the empirical evidence for a theoretical

model to understand the sexual problems of women with a history
of CSA. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 31–46.

Rellini, A. H., & Meston, C. M. (2007). Sexual function and satisfac-

tion in adults based on the definition of child sexual abuse.
Journal of Sexual Medicine, 4, 1312–1321.

Rellini, A. H., Vujanovic, A. A., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2010). Emotional

dysregulation: Concurrent relation to sexual problems among
trauma-exposed adult cigarette smokers. Journal of Sex & Marital
Therapy, 36, 137–153.

Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. P.

(1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring
emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. In
J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, and health (pp. 125–
154). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Scher, C. D., Stein, M. B., Asmundson, G. J. G., McCreary, D. R., &

Forder, D. R. (2001). The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire in a
community sample: Psychometric properties and normative data.
Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14, 843–857.

Scholerdt, K. A., & Heiman, J. R. (2003). Perceptions of sexuality as

related to sexual functioning and sexual risk in women with differ-
ent types of childhood abuse histories. Journal of Traumatic
Stress, 16, 275–284.

Testa, M., VanZile-Tamsen, C., & Livingston, J. A. (2005). Childhood

sexual abuse, relationship satisfaction, and sexual risk taking in a
community sample of women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 73, 1116–1124.

Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search of

definition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child
Development, 59(2=3), 25–52.

Tull, M. T., Barrett, H. M., McMillan, E. S., & Roemer, L. (2007). A

preliminary investigation of the relationship between emotion
regulation

difficulties

and

posttraumatic

stress

symptoms.

Behavior Therapy, 38, 303–313.

Walker, E. A., Unutzer, J., Rutter, C., Gelfand, A., Saunders, K.,

VonKorff, M., et al. (1999). Costs of health care use by women
HMO members with a history of childhood abuse and neglect.
Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 609–613.

Wheeless, L. R., Wheeless, V. E., & Baus, R. (1984). Sexual communi-

cation, communication satisfaction, and solidarity in the develop-
mental stages of intimate relationships. Western Journal of Speech
Communication, 48, 217–230.

Wishman, M. A., & Uebelacker, L. A. (2007). Maladaptive schemas

and core beliefs in treatment and research with couples. In L. P.
Riso, P. L. du Toit, D. J. Stein, & J. E. Young (Eds.), Cognitive
schemas and core beliefs in psychological problems: A scientist-
practitioner guide (pp. 199–220). Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.

RELLINI, VUJANOVIC, GILBERT, AND ZVOLENSKY

442

Copyright of Journal of Sex Research is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed

to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However,

users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.