1277176745

1277176745



306


LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL

from unconscious perceptual processes. Canadian Journal of

Psychology, 40, 343-367.

CHOMSKY, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.

CIALDINI, R. B. (1993). Influence: Science and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.

CIALDINI. R B., BORDEN, R. J.. THORNE, A.. WALKER. M. R., FREEMAN, S., & SLOAN, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 34, 366-375.

CIALDINI, R. B. & R1CHARDSON, K. D. (1980). Two indirect tactics of image management: Basking and blasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 406-415.

COHEN, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behaiioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

COHEN, N. J. & SQUIRE, L. R. (1980). Preserved leaming and reten-tion of panem analyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of kno-wing how and knowing what. Science, 210, 207-210.

COMSTOCK, G„ CHAFFER, S, KATZMAN, N„ MCCOMBE, M., & ROBERTS, D. (1978). Television and human behaeior. New York: Columbia University Press.

COOLEY, C. H. (1964). Human naturę and the social order. New York: ScribnePs. (lere edition 1902)

COOPER, J., & FAZIO, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theo-ry. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Admnces in experimental and social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 229-266). New York: Academic Press.

COOPER, W. H. (1981). Ubiąuitous halo. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 218-244.

COUSINS, N. (1957, 5 Octobre). Smudging the unconscious. Saturday RetHew, 40, p. 20.

COX, L. (1974). Depressive symptoms as affected by aggresswe stimuli subliminally and supraliminally presented. Unpublished docto-ral dissertation, Fordham University.

CRANDALL, C. S. (1984). The liking of foods as a result of exposure: Eating doughnuts in Alaska. Journal of Personality, 36, 67-83.

CRAWFORD, H. J., MACDONALD, H„ & HILGARD, E. R. (1979). Hypnotic deafness: A psychological study of responses to tonę intensity as modified by hypnosis. American fournal of

Psychology, 92, 193-214.

CROCKER, J. (1981). Judgment of covariation by social perceivers. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 272-292.

\



Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
324 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL MERIKLE, P. M. (1982). Unconscious perception revisited. Perception and
30 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL ete associe. Ce dernier suhira 1 influence de 1 effet d ex-position percept
308 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL DIXON, N. F. (1971). Subliminal perception: The naturę of a contro-versy.
10 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL •v mission nationale de la communication et des libertes (CNCL) qui av
12 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL la question en psychologie lors des quinze dernieres annees. Ils montrent e
16 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL Les premieres recherches experimentales sur la per-ception non consciente d
18 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL sus automatiąues que la psychologie cognitive, la psychologie sociale, la
20 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL Channouf et Rouibah) presentent des recherches expe-rimentales qui s enchai
22 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL (stimulus anciens) parmi des polygones nouveaux, non vus precedemment. Les
26 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL chercheurs, il n en demeure pas moins qu existe la possibilite de manipuler
28 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL avantages en psychologie sociale du paradigme experi-mental d exposition su
316 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL jectivity and suffering: Is consciousness the solution? In A. Tesser &
318 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL JAMES, W. (1890). Theprinciples ofpsychology. New York: Holt. JAMIESON, D.
LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL MCCAULEY, C., PARMELF.F., C. M., SPERBF.R, R. D., & CARR, T. H. (1980). Ea
326 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL NEWELL, A., & SIMON, H. A. (1972). Humań problem soluing. Englewood Cl
332 LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL and contrast effects in communication and attitude cbange. New Haven, CT:
330LE POUVOIR SUBLIMINAL SAEGERT, ). (1979). Another look at subliminal perception. Journal of Aduer
00230 819cd9235a78d0f202ffb72a6ad790 232 Baxley Figurę 10. Fit of IMA Model to Machinę Average Y2

więcej podobnych podstron