Obrona zagadnienia ok


  1. Evaluate the behaviourist views on the first language acquisition on the basis of what we know about this process today.

First of all, the behaviourist theory was developed by Skinner who claimed that language learning is just like any other learning. It is a habit formation. The child is like a tabula rasa when entering the linguistic world and it imitates, repeats and practices. But today, it is known that it is not true. Children are able to create utterances which they have never heard before that is why we cannot treat children as parrots who only repeat. But the behaviourist theory should not be discarded. It explains how simple and regular things are learnt. Also not all children repeat and still at some point they start talking and even if some children repeat they are not able to repeat all the phrases.

According to Chomsky, however, a language can't be learned in a mechanical way because it's too complex:

  1. How do children acquire their mother tongue? Discuss some theories you are familiar with.

First of all, the process of acquiring language by children is universal. All children all around the world learn mother tongue in a similar way. There three main first language acquisition theories:

  1. Behaviourism

Language learning is the same as any other learning - habit formation. Child that enters linguistic world is like tabula rasa. What he/she learns comes form the environment. The process of that the child hears sounds, responses to them and sees what is the reaction of the environment. Then he/she associates the sound with the effect. Then child can imitate it and receive reinforcement. This theory, however, does not explain how children are able to create new utterances that they have never heard before. Also, not all children repeat and what is most important they cannot repeat everything.

  1. Innatism

Lenneberg claimed that language is a species specific behaviour and it is only human beings that can learn the language. Children come to the world and are specifically programmes to learn language, they are well equipped.

McNeill - LAD (Language Acquisition Device).

It is a mechanism, predisposition to learn the language. It consists of 4 linguistic properties:

  1. Ability to distinguish sounds from other sounds in the environment (child picks up only humans sounds)

  2. The ability to organize linguistic events into various classes which can be changed. The words can be grouped. Children may make mistakes as the group expands.

  3. LAD includes knowledge that only a certain kind of linguistic system is possible

  4. It is also the ability to emerge in constant evaluation of the developing system so as to construct the simplest possible system out of the linguistic data provided.

According to nativist views the child is smart and it looks for the rules (Universal Grammar - Chomsky). That is a set of universal principles and rules that can be activated only by language and they adjust to it. Which of the rules will be activated it depends on the environment.

Innatist theory - hypothesis, formation and testing. A child forms some hypothesis and tests it. It can be confirmed, rejected or modified.

Eric Lenneberg introduced a theory of critical period. It is a period in which the child is able to acquire language only be being exposed to it. It is believed that it is by the age of puberty (when the brain is lateralised). There are two versions of critical period hypothesis :weak (it is possible to develop language- Gene ) and strong (it's impossible19th century France, Viktor).

  1. Interactionism

In this theory the emphasis is put on the linguistic environment and people who take care of children. The language is simplified and it is modified:

One way it is linguistic modification, where the speaker uses short sentences, simple structures, here and now vocabulary. Second modification is non-linguistic where we repeat, modify intonation, stress or pitch of voice.

Children that do not understand particular words can understand from intonation, gestures. They develop language as a system through which they communicate with the world around them.

Neither of these theories is a full explanatory of how language develops so they are complementary.

  1. Second language acquisition - is similar or different from the first language acquisition?

When we want to compare L1 and L2 we need to take into account Learner characteristics (e.g. knowledge of the world, cognitive maturity, knowledge of another language) and Learning conditions (freedom to be silent, modified input).

These two processes differ in such a way that the learner of the mother tongue knows less about the world and has less knowledge about things that are here and now to be able to communicate. L2 learners have more complicated ideas and they may want to communicate even with their knowledge of L2 to communicate

Also L1 acquirer has little fear of making mistakes and they are highly motivated to communicate in their L1. L2 learners may have different levels of motivation. L1 learners spend more time on learning language, they are exposed to the language very much in their first five ears. L1 learner will acquire native speaker status, what is not impossible for L2 acquirer but it is much easier. Also L1 learners do not undergo grammatical instruction.

Factors to be taken into consideration when comparing L1 vs L2 acquisition:

Learner characteristics:

Learning conditions

  1. Child - adult differences in the process of acquiring a second language.

Children: TPR is needed, concrete thinking, short attention span

Pre-school students (2-4 years old)

Primary students (5-7 years old)

Intermediate students (8-10 years old)

Transcendent students(11-14 years old)

Adults: