Jonagold na podkł WYNIKI 09 05 05

Jonagold na 12 podkładkach

Analysis of Variance for Plon 1996-2001 [kg/drzewo]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Podkladka 29484,9 11 2680,44 28,44 0,0000

Residual 6785,63 72 94,2448

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total (corrected) 36270,5 83



Analysis of Variance for Plon 1996-2001 [t/ha]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Podkladka 49504,3 11 4500,39 14,05 0,0000

Residual 23063,2 72 320,322

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total (corrected) 72567,4 83



Analysis of Variance for PPPP Wiosna 2002 [cm2]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Podkladka 11662,8 11 1060,26 37,45 0,0000

Residual 2038,57 72 28,3135

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total (corrected) 13701,4 83



Analysis of Variance for WIO (wskaźnik intensywności owocowania) [kg/cm2]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Podkladka 10,388 11 0,94436 6,33 0,0000

Residual 10,7338 72 0,149081

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total (corrected) 21,1218 83



Multiple Comparisons for Plon9601KgDrz by Podkladka

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Method: 95,0 percent Student-Newman-Keuls

Podkladka Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PB-4 4 26,275 X a

P 22 9 31,7444 X a

B 146 10 44,65 X b

B 9 8 63,05 X c

M.9-984 8 63,9 XX cd

M.9-T337 8 65,3375 XX cd

M.9-EMLA 8 69,05 XX cd

M.9-T339 8 74,7125 XX cd

Nr 47 5 77,5 XX cd

P 60 6 78,05 XX cd

M.26 5 79,9 X d

M.7 5 99,48 X e

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Multiple Comparisons for Plon9601tNaHa by Podkladka

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Method: 95,0 percent Student-Newman-Keuls

Podkladka Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PB-4 4 52,55 X a

P 22 9 79,3611 X b

Nr 47 5 96,875 XX bc

M.26 5 99,875 XX bc

B 146 10 111,625 XX cd

M.7 5 124,35 XX de

B 9 8 126,1 XX de

M.9-984 8 127,8 XX de

P 60 6 130,109 XX de

M.9-T337 8 130,675 XX de

M.9-EMLA 8 138,1 XX de

M.9-T339 8 149,425 X e

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Multiple Comparisons for PPPPWio02 by Podkladka

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Method: 95,0 percent Student-Newman-Keuls

Podkladka Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P 22 9 10,2955 X a 29,5

PB-4 4 10,6709 X a 30,5

B 146 10 19,1187 X b 55

B 9 8 31,1288 X c 89

M.9-T337 8 31,4206 X c 90

M.9-T339 8 32,1637 X c 92

P 60 6 32,6685 X c 93,5

M.9-984 8 33,4963 X c 96

Nr 47 5 34,4605 X c 99

M.26 5 34,7917 X c 99.5

M.9-EMLA 8 34,8884 X c 100 %

M.7 5 61,3021 X d 176

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Multiple Comparisons for WIOkgNaCm2 by Podkladka

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Method: 95,0 percent Student-Newman-Keuls

Podkladka Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

M.7 5 1,66299 X a

M.9-984 8 1,93317 XX ab

M.9-EMLA 8 2,00193 XX ab

M.9-T337 8 2,11285 XX ab

B 9 8 2,11597 XX ab

Nr 47 5 2,21655 XX ab

M.26 5 2,29581 XX ab

M.9-T339 8 2,35106 X b

B 146 10 2,42077 X b

P 60 6 2,42161 X b

PB-4 4 2,50786 X b

P 22 9 3,08807 X c

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
Jonagold na podkł Amova i Porównanie Średnich 08 05 12
Jonagold na podkł Amova i Porównanie Średnich 08 05 12
Jonagold na podkł Amova i Porównanie Średnich
wp a3yw+bezrobocia+na+skal ca+przest capczo 8cci+licencjat+10 09 05 XUMQLVUF4ZYDFAYGT3GWUGGIYNGFHUCI
09.05.2010 Śpiewnik Paschalny DW, Śpiewniki na DW Ruchu Światło-Życie
PEDIATRIA wyniki 30 05 09(1)
Ławrow trzeba uznać wybory w Libanie bez względu na wyniki (25 05 2009)
MN energetyka zadania od wykładowcy 09-05-14, STARE, Metody Numeryczne, Część wykładowa Sem IV
09 05
Ekonomika ochrony srodowiska 09.05.05, administracja, II ROK, III Semestr, rok II, sem IV, Ekonomika
formy opieki 09.05, Formy opieki zdrowotnej
zadanie na lab ze sod 05 GGDQ2AZJRTX3PVRWHKXLA3LS7MJ7FRER5NSGPEA
Z blogu Kataryny Na łasce Anodiny cz1# 05 2010
09 05 2013
ppok materiały 09 05 2012
09 05 86
Andragogika wykład 18 04, 09 05
09-05-Oswietlenie placu budowy i stanowisk pracy