DSC50 (8)

H&TCHULUlilCZNt MECHANIZMY REKLAMY

Hahn, M„ Hwang, I. (1999). Effccls of tempo and familiarity of background musie on message proccssing in TV advcrtising: A rcsourcc-matching perspcctive. Psychology and Marketing, 16, s. 659-675.

Haley. R. I., Baldingcr, A. L. (1991). The ARF Copy Research Yalidity Project. Journal of Advertising Research, 31, s. 11-31.

Han. S.-P., Shavitt, S. (1994). Persuasion and culturc: Advertising appeals in individua-listic and collcciivistic societics. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, s. 326-350.

Harrison. A. A., Saccd, L. (1977). Let’s make a deal: An analysis of revclations and stim-ulations in lonely hearts advertisements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 35,257-264.

Hassay, D. N., Smith. M. C. (1996). Compulsivc buying: An examination of the con-sumption motive. Psychology & Marketing, 13, s. 741-752.

Hatfield, E., Sprcchcr, S. (1986). Mirror, mirror... The importance of looks in everyday life. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Hess, E. H. (1965). Attitudc and pupil size. Scientific American, 4, s. 46-54.

Hess, E. H. (1975). The role of pupil size in communication. Scientific American, 5, s. 110-119.

Highhouse, S., Bcadlc, D., Galio, A., Miller, L. (1998). Get’em while they last! Effects of scarcity information in job advertisemcnis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, s. 779-795.

Hilton, M. E. (1993). An overvicw of recent findings on alcohol bevcragc waming labcls.

Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 12, s. 1-9.

Holbrook, M. B., Westwood, R. A. (1989). The role of emotion in advcrtising rcvisitcd: Testing a typology of cmotional responses. W: P. Cafferata, A. Tybout (red.), Cógnitiye and affectiee responses to advertising (s. 353-371). Lcxington, MA: Lexington Books.

Homer, P. M. (1995). Ad size as an indicator of perceived advcrtising costs and effort: The effects on memory and pcrceptions. Journal of Advertising, 24, s. 1-12.

Houston, M. B., Bettencourt, L. A., Wenger, S. (1998). The rclationship between waiting in a servicc queue and evaluations of service quality: A field theory pcrspective. Psychology and Marketing, 15, s. 735-753.

Hovland, C. I., Weiss, W. (1952). The influence of source crcdibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, s. 635-650.

Howard, D. i. (1995). „Chaining" the usc of influence strategies for producing compli-ance bchavior. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, s. 169-185.

Howard, D. J., Barry, T. E.. Gcnglcr, Ch. (1998). Distancc cvalualion effects in udvcr-tising. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, s. 85-100.

Howard, D. J., Gcnglcr, Ch. (1995). Motivating compliancc with a requcsl by rcmcmbc-ring someone’s name. Psychological Reports, 77, s. 123-129.

'■M ś

Howard, D. J., Gcnglcr, Ch., Jain, A. (1995). What's in a name? A complimentary means of pcrsuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 22. s. 200-211.

Huang. M.-H. (1997). Is negatiye affcct in advcnising generał or speciflc? A comparison of threc functional forms. Psychology A Marketing. 14, s. 223-240.

Hunt, K. A., Kcaveney, S. M.. Lee, M. (1995). lnvolvemcnt, attributions, and consumer responses to rebates. Journal of Business and Psychology. 9. s. 273-297.

Huston, A. C., Donnerstcin. E.. Fairchild. H.. Feshbach, N. D.. Katz. P. A.. Murray.

J. P.. Rubinstein, E. A., Wilcox, B. L., Zuckcrman. D. (1992). Big world. smali serem:

Tlte role of television in American society. Lincoln: University of Nebrasca Press.

Iscn. A. M. (1984). The influence of positive affcct on decision-making and cognitive organization. W: T. Kinncar (red.), Advances in consumer research (L 11. s. 534-537). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

Isen. A. M. (1987). Positive affcct. cognitivc processes. and social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, s. 203-254. •

Iscn, A. M., Shalker, T. E.. Clark. M., Karp. L. (1978). Aflect, accessibility of materiał in memory. and behavior A cognitive loop? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 36, s. 1-12.

Jaffc, L. J. (1994). The uniquc predictivc ability of sex-role identity in explaining womcn’s response to advcrtising. Psychology A Marketing, II, s. 1-16.

Janiszewski, C. (1990a). The influence of print advertisemenl organization on effcct toward a brand name. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, s. 53-65.

Janiszewski, C. (1990b). The influence of nonattendcd materiał on the Processing of advertising daims. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, s. 263-278.

Jones, T. J. (1993). Children and commercial persuassion; Twenty years after. Niepublikowany raport z badań. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (USA).

Joule. R. V., Gouilloux, F-, Weber. F. (1989). The lute: A new compliancc procedurę. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, s. 741-749.

Kahncman, D., Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory. An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, s. 263—291.

Kahncman, D., Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kamins, M. A. (1990). An investigation into ..maich-up" hypothesis in celebrity advcrti-sing: Whcn bcauty may be only skin dccp. Journal of Advertising. 19, s. 4-13.

Kamp, E., Mucinnis, D. J. (1995). Characteristics of portrayed cmoiions in commercials. Journal of Advertising Research, Novetnber/December, s. 19-28.

Kardcs, F. R. (1988). Spontancous infcrcncc processes in advcitising: The effects of con-clusion omission and involvcmcnt on pcrsuasion. Journal of Consumer Research. 15. s. 225-233.

Kat*, gi LaMrsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence. New York: The Free Press.