PSYCHOLOGICZNE MECHANIZMY REKLAMY
Maison, O.. Maliszewski, N. (2002). Co to jest reklama społeczna. W: D. Maison, P. Wasilewski (rctl.). Propaganda dobrych serc, czyli rzecz o reklamie społecznej (s. 9-41). Warszawa: Agencja Wasilewski.
Makarenko. V. (2002). Szaleństwo w stylu ambient. Gazeta Wyborcza, 2-3II, s. 25.
Markiewicz, D. (1974). Effects of humor on persuasion. Sociometry, 37, s. 407-422.
Maruszewski. T. (2001). Psychologia poznania. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Mathur, M., Chattopadhyay, A. (1991). The impact of moods generated by tcievision programs on responses to advertising. Psychology and Marketing, 8, s. 59-77.
Manila. A. (1998). An examination of consumers' use of heuristic cues in making satis-faction judgments. Psychology and Marketing, 15, s. 477-501.
Matlin, M., Slang, D. (1979). The Pollyanna principle. Cambridge, Mass.: Shenkman.
Matthews, D., Dictz-Uhlcr. B. (1998). The black-sheep cffect: How posilive and ncgative advertisements affect voters’ perccptions of the sponsor of the advertisement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, s. 1903-1915.
Mayer, J. D. (1986). How mood influences cognition. W: N. E. Sharkey (red.). Advances in cognitive science (s. 290-314). Chichester Ellis Horwood.
McCann. S. J. H. (1997). Threatening limes, ..strong" presidential popular vote winners, and the victory margin, 1824-1964. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, s. 160-170.
McCann, S. J. H. (1998). The extendcd American social, cconomic, and political threat index (1788-1992). Journal of Psychology, 132, s. 435-449.
McCann, S. J. H. (2001). Hcight, societal threat, and rictory margin in presidential elec-tions (1824-1992). Psychological Reports, 88, s. 741-742.
McCann, S. J. H., Stewin, L. L. (1990). Good and bad years: An indcx of American social, cconomic, and political threat (1920-1986). Journal of Psychology, 124, s. 601-617.
McDaniel, S. R„ Kinney, L. (1998). The iinplicalions of reccncy and gender elTccts in comumer response toumbush marketing. Psychology aiul Marketing. 15, s. 385-403.
Mcssick. D. Mf, Hlooin, S„ Holdi/ar, J. P„ Surnuclson, Ch. I). (1985). Why we tire fnirer limit olhorti. Journal of Esperlmental Social Psychology, 21, s. 480-5(M),
Milgrom, P„ Roberta, J, (1986), Price uml advertising as signals ol producl c|iinlliy. Journal of Political Pconomy, 94, i. 796-821.
Miller, N„ Maniywnm, (l„ llcuhcr, K. J„ Valone, K. (1976). S|>ccd of «peccłl uml ihmsiiu-klon, Journal of Personality and Stu lał Psycholog)/, 34, *.615 624.
Minlunl. P. W., Illmila, S„ Słdenduttunkh, I). (1992), Moodas dcicniliiuuil of potlconuimp-Ilon prodllUl eviiliiillloiiS! Mooil elfecls and thelr depemleney on (lic affccllvo inlenslly ofllteconsunipllonex|X'ilciHV.yoH/ni(/({/'(V(/iwrme»,/,Mv/io/ojvv, /,». 173 195.
Ml/eiskl. R, W., Whlle, J. I). (1986). llmlcislumling uml uslng emollons In mkeiilslng. Journal of Ciuisumer Marketing, 3, | 37- 69.
Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T.. Zajonc, R. B. (2000). SuMiminal mero euposure: Spccific, generał, ani) diffusc cffccls. Psychological Science, II, s. 462-466.
Monroc, K. B. (1976). The influence of pricc diffcrcnccs and brand familiarny on brand prcfcrenccs. Journal of Comumer Research, 3, s. 42-49.
Moorc, D. L., Hauskncchl. D., Thamodaran, K. (1986). Time compression. response opportunity. and persuasion. Journal ofConsumer Research. 13, s. 85-99.
Mullcn, B., Hu, L. (1988). Social projection as a function of cognitisc mechanism: iwo meta-analytic integration. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, s. 333-356.
Mundorf, N„ Zillman, D.. Drew, D. (1991). Effecis of disturbing ielcvised cvćnls on the acquisition of information ftom subseąucntly presented commercials. Journal of Advenising, 20, s. 46-53.
Murphy. S. T., Zajonc. R. B. (1994). Afekt, poznanie i świadomość: Rola afeklywnych bodźców poprzedzających eksponowanych w warunkach optymalnych i suboptymal-nych. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 37, s. 261-299.
Myers. D. G. (1990). Social psychology (3 wyd.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy,
78. s. 311-329.
Newell. S. J., Henderson. K. V., Wu, B. T. (2001). The effecis of plcasure and arousal on recall of advcrtisemcnls during the Super Bowl. Psychology and Marketing. 18, s. 1135-1153.
Nęcka, E. (2000). Pobudzenie intelektu. Zarys formalnej teorii inteligencji. Kraków: Universitas.
Nickcll, D., Herzog, H. A., Jr. (1996). Ethical ideology and morał persuasion: pcrsonal ntoral philosophy, gender. and judgments of pro-and anti-animal rescarch propaganda. Society and Animals, 4, s. 53-64.
Nisbctt, R. E., Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can knoty: V«bal rcpons on ntcntal processes, Psychological Revlew, 84, s. 231-259.
Nord, W, R„ Peter, J. P. (1980). A bchnvior modification perspectivc on marketing. Journtd of Marketing, 44, s. 36-47.
Norris, C. !•„ Colnmn, A. M. (1993). Conl0Xl effecis on mcmory for tclevision adtenise-lUcnls, Social llehavlor otul Personality, 21, i. 279-2%.
Noith. A. G.J 1 lngrcavci, I). J, (1998), 'lite effccl of musie on ninutsplicre and punhasc IiUuihIoiis In a oiilblorln, Journal of Applied Siwiał Psychul/igy, 28, s. 2254-2273. Nuliln, j, M„ jr, (1987), AllbclWo poiuiui|iioiu!os uf mcie uwnctsltip: Tltc nnnio Icticr clloct In twelvc Europom) liiilguiinuN. liiao/ieiin Janinnl nf Sm lal Psycholog)', 17, | 318-402.
I jffi ‘1'iuigos and pricc IoyoI lor slums, W: M. J. Sdillngcr (nul), Adwinrw
n ansionei Research (l, 2, I (193 703). l’t«vo, UT: AssocliItlOI) for CoiwmiM Koscmclt,