42
11 AO NblNELUBNrAICrO H AC A.113 AAZHCMZ M ?KA^A€MZ M NA£M GbIBAŁŚMZ.114 CTpA^AC-MZ H CłCBITAKMZ CA. 12 M TpOVf*AAWMZ CA A^AAtfftlJJG CBOMMM p^ŁCAMM. OEACBCTAISMM EAAroCAOBMMZ rONMMM OVfApZ/KMMZ CA115 13 ^OVfAMMM MOAMMZ116 CA. fAKO OTpTEM117
BbC€MOVf MMpOVf KbjKOMZ. BbCBMZ nonbpANMt€ AOC€A*K. 14 N€ CpAMAfAIA CA118 BACZ nMUJtt cm. NZ rAKO HA AA CBOrA BZZ/MOBAICNAtA NAKAZAĆ119 15 ALJJC BO TbMżfi n'BCTOVfNZ120 MMATG
0 ^pMCTE. NZ NC- MZNOrbl OTbU,A. O ^pMCTE BO MCOVfCB CBANrCAMK-MB A£Z Bbl pOAM^Z. 16 MO A >K€ Bbl nOAOBBNbl MM EBIBAMTG.
1 3 BpATMK-. EAArOAATb BAMZ M MMpZ OTZ EOrA OTbUA TOCnOAA NAUJGrO MCOVfCZ ^pMCTA. 4^BAAtffi EOrA MOK-rO BbCC-rAA O BACZ.121 o BAArOAATM EOttMM AANTM BAMZ O ^pMCTE MCOVfC'K. 5 IAICO BBCBAe OEOrATMCTC CA O NŁGMb BbCKMb CAOBOMb. M BbCC-Mb pAZ.OV(MOMb. 6 fAKO ttG rTAMNA BO^KMIA^122 MZBTCTM CA O123 BACZ. 7 lAKO BAMZ NC AMLUMTM CA124 NM
113 H add. D C Tf P30 K W. (Kai 7ieivc>pev ... N27). Sign of revision in these MSS or simply addition of an extra copula lo thc string?
114 ORJPDCTf P30 K M. N<M"c>Tovp€MZ SBQHTFALW. Both variants are attestated in old MSS, as well as in morę recent ones, although the latter variant predominates in Continuous MSS sharing features of the F A L W group. The periphrastic rendering is thought to be primary and has been chosen in the text.
1 !5 SBJPRMTHD P30 F A L W, ApatMM ca Q. TpbtiMMZ C Tf. C and Tf are not joined by either P30 or K and M and arc likely to have individual variants, as is the reading in Q ( avexópe6a N27, AD).
116 SOBPQKTHFALW, mammu R, ov|MAMM J, tbujmm D C P30 Tf, teujhm ce M. Why did C and its companions chose this rare word to render TtapaKaXoOpev, omitting even the following ca? The position of M is remarkable.
117 BKMTCTfALW, TpBKM S P F. TpBEOBANMe R J, Tp-EEHMM O, OTpBEB H. In S P F a case of haplography is found. The corruption in O. as well as in R J. might find its origin in this error.
118 S O R J P Q D P30 T M, om. K H C Tf F A L W, *e B. The combination of C Tf K and F A L W is interesting and up to a certain extent paralleled in notę 111 above, but they are joined by nonę of the Commented MSS D or P30. B offers a simple error.
119 vo-u0exw AD. B D F latt; vo\j0ex(o(v) N27 11 R A C P pc; The Slavic is uncertain because of
confusion of the nasals. I sing is found inSOBJPQRHDCTMTfFW(K unreadable).
Z L A pic. pr. — a Bbl add. O J P R.
120 SOBPQTMFALW. neTACOAhi J, nactabknmkz D C Tf P30, N&CT&RbNHCbi Z. The mss D C Tf P30 have a significant variant common with Z (after corruption?). The J variant may be an old reading, echoing the Greek naiSaYÓyouę.
121 SOZBRJPQRTMFALW,^BbiDCTf P30 K. C together with the other Commented MSS and K (see Introduction).
122 SOZBJPQH. nz czb-battgabctbo ^pMCTOBO D C Tf P30 K T M F A L W. (xó papxbpiov xo0 xptoxou N27, AD.). The Greek would support czRBATTeAhCTBO xpncTOBO of C and the other Commented MSS, but not m; FALW sharing this reading could be a sign of revision, but in K T M revision is not frequent. H is noticeably the only Continuous ms. to share the reading of the Lectionary ordered MSS.
123 SBZJPQRTHFA LW, ovj D C P30 K: error probably from the Glagolitic, Bb Tf M, secondary from the reading of D C P30 K, thus demonstrating affinity within the Commented group and with K, M; O reads b&mz instead of o bacz.
124 SOZBJPAW (amuiatm L), amujmtz ca R Q F, amujcnomz KbiTH D C Tf K T M, AMiueNbitJb ebith P30. Again C shares with the Commented MSS and K T M the use of a verb in the perfect tense in contrast with the lectionaries and FALW.