4053062881

68

CHAPTER 3. THE SHORT PENTECOST LECTIONARY

19 T&pbAOK- K€ OVfEO 0CN0BANM1G EOKMK CTOMTZ. MMMM HGHATb CMW>. nO£NA rOCIlOAb C/WłJMłA ^ro. M AA OTZCTffillMTZ OTZ NGIlpABbAbl BbCr&ICZ MM€NOVfrffiM MMA rOCriOAbNOK-.

Sunday of Week 33 after Pentecost

2Tim. 3 10-15 (MSS: SBZJPQRH KMTTf P30 F A L W)

3 10 EpATMŁG. Tbl *6 nOCATAOBA³⁵⁴ MM 0VfH6NMK>. >KMTMK>. npMBTTOVJ. BTpT. Tpbn^NMK).³⁵⁵ AfOKZBM. Tpbn^NMK)³⁵⁶ 11 M^FZNANMIGMZ MttHGNMŁGMZ fAICOffie³⁵⁷ MM EbIWA BZ ANTMO^MM M BZ MICONMM M BZ AVfCTp*B^Z. M tAICO³⁵⁸ M^rZNANMfA FlpMlA^Z. M OTZ BbC^Z MA M£EABM rOCnOAb. 12 M BbCM AG ^OTALjJGM ttMTM GAArOBSpbNO³⁵⁹ O ^pMCTT MCOKfCK. M^rZNANM BASAASTZ. 13 AASłCABMM AG HAOBTUM M TOMTM.³⁶⁰ BZZHGC^TZ CA HA rOpbWGIG AbLUALJJG CA M AbCTMMM.³⁶¹ 14 Tbl AG npTEbIBAM BZ NM^ZAG NAO\fHGNZ³⁶² KCM M BTpbNZ EbICTZ. BTAbl OTZ KblM^Z NAOVfHM CA. 15 M rAICO MZ.Z MAAAA CBATAIA łCZNMrbl³⁶³ OyfMTlGUJM. MOr^LUAłA TA OV(M^ApMTM BZ CZflACGNMIG BTpOtfK tAAG O ^pMCTT MCOVfCT.

³⁵⁴    H, hoca-eaobah B Z J P R T, nocA-BAOV{H M Tf P30, nocAiiAOBAA F A L W. Uncenainty seems to reign among the scribes as to the ‘correct* Slavic form of the 2 sing aorist.(N21: rcapriKoXoi>9Tiaa<;). As things are. only one witness offers the acceptable form: the formation in F A L W foreshadowes futurę developments in Russian.

³⁵⁵    SBJPQRHMT Tf. tpoTocTM K Z, tpiteactbmk? P30, AAzroTpneNWO F A L W.

³⁵⁶    Z P Tf A L W, CTpACTM S Q. TpfTBACTBMK) B J R H M. AArTpn-RNMK) K. om. F. Clearly. some attempts at variation were madę by the Slavic scribes to render the Greek original (N27: paKpo9i>pią (...) \j7topovfi); F's omission is probably due to a saul du meme au meme.

³⁵⁷    J P Q R H. r&KA B. raatG Z K. rac a *c- S M T Tf P30. iakoba JKG F A L W. Some attempts to decline rajco. See also next notę.

³⁵⁸    S P R H. racAB T. rAico AG M M, kaca Tf P30, kako Z K. rac oba F A L W, om. J. See preceding notę; cf. N27: oia....o‘io\x;.

³⁵⁹    S B J P Q R H M T F A W, KAArosBCTbNO Z K Tf P30 L. Lexical variation, whithout elear distinction of groups: C is missing and the unity of FALW is broken once again.

³⁶⁰    S B J P. eomtm Z Q H M T. eotmc- R, HApoAisM Tf P30 FALW. bacbm m eomtm Z, bacbmm K. The translation of yÓTyceę had its difficulties: eomtm (and its inevitable comiption in R) could be explained by an error from the Glagolitic: i and might look alike to a transcriptor. The doublet, incorporating the Glagolitic error, in Z illustrates the uncertainty of the Slavic translators; with HApOATM a ncw word is formed, as if boacbmh was insufficient.

³⁶¹    S B J P R H M T Tf P30, np-EAUJAGMHZ K F A L W.

³⁶²    S B Z J P Q R H K M T Tf P30 L. haov|HMA ca F A W. The formation of the past tenses here diffentiates along almost the same lines as above; see above on this page.

³⁶³    S B Z J P Q R H K M T Tf P30. cbaujcnnaa hmcanma FALW.