4053062868

56

CHAPTER 3. THE SHORT PENTECOST LECTIONARY

Sunday of Week 22 after Pentecost

Gal. 6 11-18 (MSS: OBZJPQRHMTDCTf P30 F A L W)

6 11 EpATMI€. BMAMTG KOAMITEMM ICZNMFAMM nMCA^Z BAMZ. MOlGtfft p/WCOfTK. 12 KAMICO ^OTATZ EAArOAMHMTM CA BZ I1AZTM CMM ETAATZ Bbl OEpTZATM CA TZICZMO AA NG CpbCTOMb MCOVfZ ^pMCTOBOMb TONATZ CA. 13 NM OEp^AtfWUGM EO CA CAMM Z.AKONZ²³² ^pANATZ. NZ ^OTATZ Bbl OEp-K^ATM AA BZ BAUJGM I1AZTM nO^BAAATZ²³³ CA. 14 MblTK KG AA NG E^ACTZ ^BAAMTM²³⁴ CA TZICZMO O KpbCTE rOCłlOAA NAUJCro MCOVfCZ ^pMCTA MMb?K€ MENS BECE²³⁵ MMpZ pACflATZ CA M A£Z BbC€MOVf²³⁶ MMpOVf. 15 O ^pMCTE EO MCOVfCK²³⁷ NM OEpT£ANMIG HbTO MOffiGTZ²³⁸ NM AICpOBOVfCTMIA²³⁹ NZ NOBA TBApb. 16 KAMICO npABMAT²⁴⁰ CGMb npMAOJKATZ CA MMpZ NA NM/\Z M MMAOCTb M NA MZApAMAM EOttMM. 17 npOHGK WG TpOVfAZ AA NMKZTO WG AA1GTZ MM AZZ EO rAZ,Bbl TOCnOAA MCOV(CA NA TTAT MOł€Mb NOLUAS. 18 EAArOAATb TOCHOAA NAUJC-rO MCOVfCZ ^pMCTA CZ AOVf^OMb BAUJMMb. EpATMK AMMNb.

Saturday of Week 23 after Pentecost

2Cor. 8 1-5 (MSS: OBZJPQRHMTDCTfFALW)

8 1 EpATMŁG. CZICAZAraS²⁴¹ WG BAMZ EpATMIS MOIA EAArOAATb EOWMIffi AANAStfK BZ UpbłCZBA^Z MAICGAONbOCblM^Z. 2 tAfCO BZ MZNOST MOCOVfLUGNMM flGHAAM MZ.EEITZKZ pAAOCTM M^Z M tAWG no rAOV(EMN'E NMljJGTA MMZ M£EblCTZ BZ EOrATbCTBO npOCTpANbCTBA²⁴² M^Z. 3 ttdCO npOTMBtt CMAT M^Z CZBTATTGAECTBOVjtffr M riAHG CMAbl CAMOBOAbNM. 4 CZ MZNOrOMb MOAłGNMłGMb MOAAUJG CA NAM Z EAArOAATb M OEbljJGNMlG CAOV[WGNMK) MWG BZ CBATEIM^Z.²⁴³ 5 NG IAICO NAATfA^OMZ CA NZ CGEG BZAAlilA ApCBAlG rOCnOAOVf M NAMZ BOAI^WS EOWMKtfiS.

²³²    OBQPZMDCTf P30 A W. £akona J H T F L. A tracę of the G/A (cf. N27: vó}iov)?

²³³    JPQRZHMTDCTfP30FALW,xBAAATzOB.

²³⁴    OBQPRZHTDCTf P30, no^AHTW J M F A L W.

²³⁵    O B J M T D C Tf P30, om. ZPQRHFALW

²³⁶    O B J M T D C Tf P30, om. ZPQRHFALW. Herc as in the preceding notę the same set of MSS uses the older Slavic expression for KÓopoę.

²³⁷    OBZJPQRHMT DCTf P30 F A L W. The Slavic witnesses are unanimous, however, cf. N27: o\3t€ yap 7i€pixopr), based on 46 B 4* 33 1175 1739* r(sy^p sa^mas; but the basis for the Slavic translation is found in the apparatus: ev yap Xpiotqj Ir|ao\) oote 7i€piTopf| N A C D F G lat sy^h. This clearly points to the Byzantine Greek text as source for the Slavic translation. See also next notę.

²³⁸    As was the case in the preceding notę, the Slavic witnesses are unanimous in following the Greek Byzantine text, cf. N27, which offers eoitv in the text, based on $JM6 X* A B C D* F G and a number of lectionaries (for details see apparatus of N27 ad locum), but according to the apparatusiaxÓ€b on which the Slavic is undoubtedly based, figures in R² ¥ lat sy^h.

²³⁹    B Z P Q R (partly illegible) J H T, NCOEp^ANMłC M D C Tf P30 F A L W. N€»cpA605frB^ANHG O. (N27 aKpoPuotia, no variants).

²⁴⁰    O T D C Tf P30 F A L W. kanohk B Z J R Q H, ^aicon* P; M is the most thoroughly corrupted at this point, reading for the beginning of this verse to npMAOKATZ ca: m BhCM mjkg McnpABAGNMH ccmk npMCTANWTZ.

²⁴¹    OBZJPQRMCTfW, czka^ak-mz H T D F A L. (N27: yvojpięo|i£v, without altematives).

²⁴²    Q H F A L W, -o\f B M T D C Tf, -Mt€Mb Z J R (on which cf. below), -o O. A very wide differentiation in the choice of the case. The same thing occurs with the immediately following m^z: this is the choice of M F A L W, whereas OBQHTDCTf readuMZ; this shows B T D C Tf as consistent in their use of the D\ Z J R omit it by contraction, reading npocTpANbCT&MKMb.